Background In patients with melanoma, ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) prolongs overall survival and nivolumab (anti-PD-1) produced durable tumor regressions in a phase 1 trial. Based on their distinct immunologic mechanisms of action and supportive preclinical data, we conducted a phase 1 trial of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab in advanced melanoma patients. Methods Patients received nivolumab and ipilimumab every 3 weeks for 4 doses, followed by nivolumab alone every 3 weeks for 4 doses (concurrent regimen). Combined treatment was subsequently continued every 12 weeks for up to 8 doses. In a sequenced regimen, patients previously treated with ipilimumab received nivolumab every 2 weeks. Results Fifty-three patients received concurrent nivolumab/ipilimumab and 33 received sequenced treatment. The objective response rate, for all concurrent-regimen patients was 40% (modified WHO criteria). Evidence of clinical activity (conventional, unconfirmed, or immune-related response or stable disease ≥24 weeks) was observed in 65% of patients. At the maximum tolerated dose (1 mg/kg nivolumab + 3 mg/kg ipilimumab), 53% of patients achieved an objective response, all with ≥80% tumor reduction. Grade 3–4 related adverse events occurred in 53% of concurrent-regimen patients, but were qualitatively similar to historical monotherapy experience and were generally reversible. Among sequenced-regimen patients, 18% had grade 3–4 related adverse events and the objective response rate was 20%. Conclusions Concurrent nivolumab/ipilimumab had a manageable safety profile and achieved clinical activity that is distinct from published monotherapy data, with rapid and deep tumor regressions in a substantial number of patients.

Competing Interests Statement RMS, TAC and LGTM are inventors on a provisional patent application (62/569,053) filed by MSK, relating to the use of TMB in cancer immunotherapy.MDH, NAR and TAC are inventors on a PCT patent application (PCT/US2015/062208) filed by MSK, relating to the use of TMB in lung cancer immunotherapy.MSK and the inventors may receive a share of commercialization revenue from license agreements relating to these patent applications. CHL received research funding from Eisai, BMS, Exelixis, Pfizer, Calithera and consulting fees from Exelixis and Eisai. ANS has received research support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Immunocore, Astra-Zeneca, Xcovery and serves on the advisory board for Bristol Myers Squibb, Immunocore, Castle Biosciences; he also receives royalties from UpToDate. MDH receives research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb; is paid consultant to Merck

Pneumonitis is an uncommon but potentially fatal toxicity of anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1)/ programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features are poorly described. MethodsPatients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy or in combination with anti-cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4 mAb were identified at two institutions (Memorial Sloan Kettering Seventy-two percent (31 of 43) of cases were grade 1 to 2, and 86% (37 of 43) improved/resolved with drug holding/immunosuppression. Five patients worsened clinically and died during the course of pneumonitis treatment; proximal cause of death was pneumonitis (n = 1), infection related to immunosuppression (n = 3), or progressive cancer (n = 1). Radiologic and pathologic features of pneumonitis were diverse. ConclusionPneumonitis associated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 mAbs is a toxicity of variable onset and clinical, radiologic, and pathologic appearances. It is more common when anti-PD-1/PD-L1 mAbs are combined with anti-cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4 mAb. Most events are low grade and improve/ resolve with drug holding/immunosuppression. Rarely, pneumonitis worsens despite immunosuppression, and may result in infection and/or death.

Following initial successes in melanoma treatment, immunotherapy has rapidly become established as a major treatment modality for multiple types of solid cancers, including a subset of colorectal cancers (CRCs). Two programmed cell death 1 (PD1)-blocking antibodies, pembrolizumab and nivolumab, have shown efficacy in patients with metastatic CRC that is mismatch-repair-deficient and microsatellite instability-high (dMMR-MSI-H), and have been granted accelerated FDA approval. In contrast to most other treatments for metastatic cancer, immunotherapy achieves long-term durable remission in a subset of patients, highlighting the tremendous promise of immunotherapy in treating dMMR-MSI-H metastatic CRC. Here, we review the clinical development of immune checkpoint inhibition in CRC leading to regulatory approvals for the treatment of dMMR-MSI-H CRC. We focus on new advances in expanding the efficacy of immunotherapy to early-stage CRC and CRC that is mismatch-repair-proficient and has low microsatellite instability (pMMR-MSI-L) and discuss emerging approaches for targeting the immune microenvironment, which might complement immune checkpoint inhibition. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of cancer death worldwide. In developed countries, early detection through screening has improved the 5-year survival of patients with CRC, but ~25% of patients still present with stage 4 disease, and a further 25-50% present with early-stage disease but go on to develop metastatic disease 1-4. The prognosis for patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) remains poor, with a median 5-year survival of only 12.5% in the USA 2. Thus, the development of more effective treatments for patients with this disease is an urgent unmet need. In the past decade, immunotherapy has elicited

Metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) are clinically heterogeneous, but the genomic basis of this variability remains poorly understood. We performed prospective targeted sequencing of 1,134 CRCs. We identified splice alterations in intronic regions of APC and large in-frame deletions in CTNNB1, increasing oncogenic WNT pathway alterations to 96% of CRCs. Right-sided primary site in microsatellite stable mCRC was associated with shorter survival, older age at diagnosis, increased mutations, and enrichment of oncogenic alterations in KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, AKT1, RNF43, and SMAD4 compared with left-sided primaries. Left-sided tumors frequently had no identifiable genetic alteration in mitogenic signaling, but exhibited higher mitogenic ligand expression. Our results suggest different pathways to tumorigenesis in right- and left-sided microsatellite stable CRC that may underlie clinical differences.

Purpose To investigate the safety and efficacy of durvalumab, a human monoclonal antibody that binds programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and the role of PD-L1 expression on clinical response in patients with advanced urothelial bladder cancer (UBC). Methods A phase 1/2 multicenter, open-label study is being conducted in patients with inoperable or metastatic solid tumors. We report here the results from the UBC expansion cohort. Durvalumab (MEDI4736, 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) was administered intravenously for up to 12 months. The primary end point was safety, and objective response rate (ORR, confirmed) was a key secondary end point. An exploratory analysis of pretreatment tumor biopsies led to defining PD-L1–positive as ≥ 25% of tumor cells or tumor-infiltrating immune cells expressing membrane PD-L1. Results A total of 61 patients (40 PD-L1–positive, 21 PD-L1–negative), 93.4% of whom received one or more prior therapies for advanced disease, were treated (median duration of follow-up, 4.3 months). The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade were fatigue (13.1%), diarrhea (9.8%), and decreased appetite (8.2%). Grade 3 treatment-related AEs occurred in three patients (4.9%); there were no treatment-related grade 4 or 5 AEs. One treatment-related AE (acute kidney injury) resulted in treatment discontinuation. The ORR was 31.0% (95% CI, 17.6 to 47.1) in 42 response-evaluable patients, 46.4% (95% CI, 27.5 to 66.1) in the PD-L1–positive subgroup, and 0% (95% CI, 0.0 to 23.2) in the PD-L1–negative subgroup. Responses are ongoing in 12 of 13 responding patients, with median duration of response not yet reached (range, 4.1+ to 49.3+ weeks). Conclusion Durvalumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile and evidence of meaningful clinical activity in PD-L1–positive patients with UBC, many of whom were heavily pretreated.

No abstract

Our findings provide additional support for the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines that categorize TNT as a viable treatment strategy for rectal cancer. Our data suggest that TNT facilitates delivery of planned systemic therapy. Long-term follow-up will determine if this finding translates into improved survival. In addition, given its high CR rate, TNT may facilitate nonoperative treatment strategies aimed at organ preservation.