Background and aims: Mutations in BRAF have been linked with colorectal cancers (CRC) showing high level microsatellite instability (MSI-H). However, the distribution of BRAF mutations in MSI-H cancers remains to be clarified with respect to precursor lesions and the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). Methods: Forty three hyperplastic polyps (HP), nine mixed polyps (MP), five serrated adenomas (SA), 28 conventional adenomas (AD), 18 hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancers (HNPCC), and 127 sporadic CRC (46 MSI-H and 81 non-MSI-H) were collected from patients undergoing colectomy for either CRC or hyperplastic polyposis. Twenty five of 57 serrated lesions were derived from four patients with hyperplastic polyposis. HP were further subdivided according to recently documented morphological criteria into 27 classical HP and 16 variant lesions described as ''sessile serrated adenoma'' (SSA). All tumours were screened for BRAF activating mutations. Results: The BRAF mutation was more frequent in SSA (75%) and MP (89%) than in classical HP (19%), SA (20%), and AD (0%) (p,0.0001), and also in sporadic MSI-H cancers (76%) compared with HNPCC (0%) and sporadic non-MSI-H cancers (9%) (p,0.0001). The BRAF mutation was identified more often in CIMPhigh serrated polyps (72%) and CIMP-high CRC (77%) than in CIMP-low (30%) and CIMP-negative (13%) polyps (p = 0.002) as well as CIMP-low (18%) and CIMP-negative (0%) CRC (p,0.0001). Conclusions: The BRAF mutation was frequently seen in SSA and in sporadic MSI-H CRC, both of which were associated with DNA methylation. Sporadic MSI-H cancers may originate in SSA and not adenomas, and BRAF mutation and DNA methylation are early events in this ''serrated'' pathway.
In CRC, the methylation status of multiple promoters can be predicted through knowledge of BRAF and, to a lesser extent, KRAS activating mutations, indicating that these mutations are closely associated with different patterns of DNA hypermethylation. These changes may be important events in colorectal tumorigenesis.
Background-Colorectal cancers (CRCs) with the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) often associate with epigenetic silencing of hMLH1 and an activating mutation in the BRAF gene. However, the current CIMP criteria are ambiguous, and often result in an underestimation of CIMP frequencies in CRCs. Since BRAF and KRAS belong to same signaling pathway, we hypothesized that not only mutations in BRAF, but mutant KRAS, may also associate with CIMP in CRC.
Background & Aims-DCC and UNC5C, Netrin-1 dependence receptors, perform an important role in intestinal epithelial biology. Both receptors frequently are down-regulated in colorectal cancer (CRC). Although CRCs frequently lose DCC owing to deletions at 18q, the mechanism for the UNC5C loss is poorly understood. We hypothesized that UNC5C is silenced epigenetically in CRC, and that there are interactions between losses of UNC5C and DCC in colorectal tumorigenesis.
Oncogenic PIK3CA mutations contribute to colorectal tumorigenesis by activating AKT signaling to decrease apoptosis and increase tumor invasion. A synergistic association of PIK3CA mutation with KRAS mutation has been suggested to increase AKT signaling and resistance to antiepidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor therapy for advanced colorectal cancer, although studies have been conflicting. We sought to clarify this by examining PIK3CA mutation frequency in relation to other key molecular features of defined pathways of tumorigenesis. PIK3CA mutation was assessed by high resolution melt analysis in 829 colorectal cancer samples and 426 colorectal polyps. Mutations were independently correlated with clinicopathological features including patient age, sex and tumor location as well as molecular features including microsatellite instability, KRAS and BRAF mutation, MGMT methylation and the CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP). Mutation of the helical (Exon 9) and catalytic (Exon 20) domain mutation hotspots were also examined independently. Overall, PIK3CA mutation was positively correlated with KRAS mutation (p < 0.001), MGMT methylation (p 5 0.007) and CIMP (p < 0.001). Novel, exon-specific associations linked Exon 9 mutations to a subgroup of cancers characterized by KRAS mutation, MGMT methylation and CIMP-Low, whilst Exon 20 mutations were more closely linked to features of serrated pathway tumors including BRAF mutation, microsatellite instability and CIMP-High or Low. PIK3CA mutations were uncommonly, but exclusively, seen in tubulovillous adenomas (4/124, 3.2%) and 1/4 (25.0%) tubulovillous adenomas with a focus of cancer. These data provide insight into the molecular events driving traditional versus serrated pathway tumorigenesis.
In this study, we examined the distribution of heparanase protein in 75 esophageal squamous cell carcinomas by immunohistochemistry and analyzed the relationship between heparanase expression and clinicopathological characteristics. In situ hybridization showed that the mRNA expression pattern of heparanase was similar to that of the protein, suggesting that increased expression of the heparanase protein at the invasive front was caused by an increase of heparanase mRNA in tumor cells. Heparanase expression correlated significantly with depth of tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage and lymphatic invasion. Overexpression of heparanase in esophageal cancers was also associated with poor survival. In addition to its localization in the cytoplasm and cell membrane, heparanase was also identified in the nuclei of normal epithelial and tumor cells by immunohistochemistry. Furthermore, nuclear heparanase was detected in nuclear extract of cancer cell lines by Western blot and immunohistochemistry. Examination of the role of nuclear heparanase in cell proliferation and differentiation by double immunostaining for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and cytokeratin 10 (CK10) showed significant relationship between nuclear heparanase expression and differentiation (heparanase vs CK10), but not for proliferative state of esophageal cancer cells (heparanase vs PCNA). Our results suggest that cytoplasmic heparanase appears to be a useful prognostic marker in patients with esophageal cancer and that nuclear heparanase protein may play a role in differentiation. Inhibition of heparanase activity may be effective in the control of esophageal tumor invasion and metastasis.
Methylation of the RASSF2 and SFRP2 promoters in fecal DNA is associated with the presence of gastrointestinal tumors relative to non-neoplastic conditions. Our novel fecal DNA methylation assay provides a possible means to noninvasively screen not only for colorectal tumors but also for gastric tumors.
O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is a DNA repair gene which is frequently methylated in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, it remains controversial whether methylation of specific CpG sequences within MGMT promoter leads to loss of its protein expression, and if MGMT methylation correlates with G to A transition mutations in KRAS. Two methylation sensitive regions (Mp and Eh region) of MGMT promoter were investigated in 593 specimens of colorectal tissue: 233 CRCs, 104 adenomatous polyps (AP), 220 normal colonic mucosa from CRC patients (N-C) and 36 normal colonic mucosa specimens obtained from subjects without colorectal neoplasia (N-N) by combined bisulfite restriction analysis (COBRA). The region-specific methylation data were compared to the MGMT protein expression, spectrum of KRAS mutations and other clinical features. Extensive (including both Mp and Eh) and partial (either Mp or Eh) MGMT methylation were found in 24.5% and 11.6% of CRCs, 3.8% and 27.9% of APs, 0.5% and 7.7% of C-Ns and 2.8% and 2.8% of N-Ns, respectively. Extensive methylation of MGMT promoter was primarily present in CRCs while partial methylation was common in APs. Extensive methylation of MGMT promoter was associated with loss/reduced protein expression (p < 0.0001), as well as with G to A mutations in KRAS (p 5 0.0017). We herein provide first evidence that extensive methylation of MGMT promoter region is essential for methylation-induced silencing of this gene. Our data suggest that MGMT methylation may evolve and spread throughout the promoter in a stepwise manner as the colonic epithelial cells progress through the classical-adenoma-cancer multistep cascade. ' 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Key words: O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase; KRAS mutations; promoter methylation; colorectal cancer; adenomatous polyps O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is a DNA repair gene which removes promutagenic O 6 -methylguanine (O 6 -MeG) residues from DNA and is considered an important predictive factors for chemoresistance in human cancers. [1][2][3][4][5] Loss of MGMT function permits the increased accumulation of O 6 -MeG in DNA, which promotes tumorigenesis through G:C to A:T transition mutations in growth regulating genes such as KRAS and p53. 6-9 Mutations in MGMT have rarely been found, and it has been suggested that MGMT inactivation is primarily manifested through hypermethylation-induced silencing of its promoter in human cancers, including those of the colon and rectum. 5,[9][10][11][12][13][14] However, the associations between MGMT methylation and G to A transition mutations has not been consistently reproduced in different studies. 15,16 Central to this controversy is the fact that there is a lack of clear understanding for precise relationships between methylation of specific MGMT promoter regions and its relationship with the loss of protein expression.It is becoming increasingly clear that the distribution of methylated cytosines in the CpG islands of promoters is not uniform, and the regions most importan...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.