Purpose Infection and malignancy represent two common complications after solid organ transplantation, which are often characterized by poorly specific clinical symptomatology. Herein, we have evaluated the role of 18 F-fluoro-2-deoxy-Dglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in this clinical setting. Methods Fifty-eight consecutive patients who underwent FDG PET/CT after kidney, lung or heart transplantation were included in this retrospective analysis. Twelve patients underwent FDG PET/CT to strengthen or confirm a diagnostic suspicion of malignancies. The remaining 46 patients presented with unexplained inflammatory syndrome, fever of unknown origin (FUO), CMV or EBV seroconversion during post-transplant follow-up without conclusive conventional imaging. FDG PET/CT results were compared to histology or to the finding obtained during a clinical/imaging follow-up period of at least 6 months after PET/CT study. Results Positive FDG PET/CT results were obtained in 18 (31 %) patients. In the remaining 40 (69 %) cases, FDG PET/CT was negative, showing exclusively a physiological radiotracer distribution. On the basis of a patient-based analysis, FDG PET/CT's sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were respectively 78 %, 90 %, 78 % and 90 %, with a global accuracy of 86 %. FDG PET/CT was true positive in 14 patients with bacterial pneumonias (n = 4), pulmonary fungal infection (n = 1), histoplasmosis (n = 1), cutaneous abscess (n = 1), inflammatory disorder (sacroiliitis) (n = 1), lymphoma (n = 3) and NSCLC (n = 3). On the other hand, FDG PET/CT failed to detect lung bronchoalveolar adenocarcinoma, septicemia, endocarditis and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), respectively, in four patients. FDG PET/CT contributed to adjusting the patient therapeutic strategy in 40 % of cases. Conclusions FDG PET/CT emerges as a valuable technique to manage complications in the post-transplantation period. FDG PET/CT should be considered in patients with severe unexplained inflammatory syndrome or FUO and inconclusive conventional imaging or to discriminate active from silent lesions previously detected by conventional imaging particularly when malignancy is suspected.
Superinfections originating from a digestive tract colonized by abnormally high concentrations of aerobic microorganisms as a result of impaired resistance to colonization (CR) may complicate antibiotic therapy. In this study, patients with a moderate to severe systemic infection were randomized to receive either cefotaxime (CTX, n = 10) or cotrimoxazole (CTR, n = 10), 2 antibiotic regimens presumed to spare CR; or imipenem/cilastine (I/C, n = 19). The effect on CR was measured indirectly by comparing the aerobic faecal flora before antibiotic treatment with that on day 8 of treatment. An increase in aerobic faecal flora denotes a disturbed CR, whereas a decrease means that the organism is sensitive to the effective faecal concentration of the antibiotic. Imipenem/cilastine-treated patients showed a significant increase in enterococci and Candida spp., while the number of aerobic Gram-negative rods remained constant. Cefotaxime-treated patients had evidence of an increase in enterococci, but not of Candida spp., and Escherichia coli numbers decreased significantly. In these patients the concentration of other Gram-negative aerobic rods showed a slight increase in 6 patients with a resistant Pseudomonas strain. Cotrimoxazole-treated patients showed a significant decrease in aerobic Gram-negative rods, a significant increase in Candida spp. and no change in enterococci. It is concluded that all 3 antimicrobial agents impair colonization resistance. Whether or not this is followed by overgrowth with resistant micro-organisms depends on the active faecal concentration of the antimicrobial agent and the MIC of the aerobic micro-organisms. The risk of overgrowth of the bowel with resistant Gram-negative bacilli appears to be smaller following cotrimoxazole than following cefotaxime or imipenem/cilastine.
The influence of oral administration of cefaclor, phenethicillin, co-trimoxazole and doxycycline on colonization resistance (CR) of the oropharynx and colon in healthy volunteers was studied. Antimicrobial agents were administered in a randomized cross-over design. No effect on CR of the oropharynx could be demonstrated. Phenethicillin decreased CR of the colon against Enterobacteriaceae (P = 0.001). Co-trimoxazole significantly decreased the concentration of Enterobacteriaceae in faeces (P = 0.03) but the decrease caused by cefaclor and doxycycline did not reach statistical significance. Administration of antimicrobial agents increased the appearance of secondary colonization by Enterobacteriaceae in faeces, especially when Escherichia coli was eliminated. During administration of phenethicillin, secondary colonization occurred at a concentration exceeding 10(7)/g in some volunteers. Following administration of cefaclor, co-trimoxazole and doxycycline, elimination of E. coli may result in the substitution by resistant Gram-negative bacilli in low concentrations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.