Objective To compare the evolution of motor function from mid‐gestation to 12 months of age between prenatally and postnatally repaired cases of open neural tube defect (ONTD). Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of all fetuses that underwent prenatal (fetoscopic or open hysterotomy) or postnatal ONTD repair at a single institution between November 2011 and December 2018. The anatomical level of the lesion was defined as the upper bony spinal defect at initial magnetic resonance imaging assessment. Prenatal motor function of the lower extremities was evaluated by ultrasound according to the metameric level of the neurological lesion, based on the methodology of Carreras et al. Fetal motor function was assessed at referral, at 6 weeks after surgery in prenatally repaired cases or 6 weeks after referral in postnatally repaired cases (6‐week follow‐up) and at the last scan before delivery. In addition, motor function was assessed by a detailed neurological examination at birth and 12 months of age. First sacral (S1) neurological level of the lesion was considered as intact motor function. For statistical comparisons, we attributed numerical scores to each neurological level and motor function was expressed as median (range) neurological level. Motor function (as numerical score) and the proportion of cases with intact motor function and with motor function two or more levels better than expected based on the anatomical level of the lesion were compared between the prenatal‐ and postnatal‐repair groups. Fetal motor function was compared to the anatomical level of the lesion at referral and a better motor function was defined when it was two or more levels better than the anatomical level of the lesion. To assess the evolution of motor function, we compared motor function at referral with that at each follow‐up assessment using paired t‐tests. Results We included 127 patients with ONTD, of whom 93 underwent prenatal (51 fetoscopic and 42 open hysterotomy) and 34 postnatal repair. At the time of referral, cases in the prenatal‐ and postnatal‐repair groups presented with a similar anatomical level of lesion (L3 (T9–S1) vs L3 (T7–S1); P = 0.52), similar motor function (S1 (L1–S1) vs S1 (L1–S1); P = 0.52) and a similar proportion of cases with intact motor function (81% vs 79%; P = 0.88) and with motor function two or more levels better than expected based on the anatomical level of the lesion (62% vs 74%; P = 0.24). When compared with prenatally repaired cases, postnatally repaired cases showed worse motor function at birth (S1 (L1–S1) vs L4 (L1–S1); P < 0.01) and at 12 months of age (S1 (L1–S1) vs L4 (L1–S1); P < 0.01). In the prenatal‐repair group, motor function remained stable from the time of referral to 12 months of age (P = 0.26). Furthermore, the proportion of patients with intact motor function at referral (81% (75/93)) was similar to that at the 6‐week follow‐up (74% (64/87)), at the last scan before birth (74% (42/57)), at birth (68% (63/93)) and at 12 months of age (67% (39/58)) in the pren...
CONTRIBUTIONWhat are the novel findings of this work? Prenatal and postnatal brain microstructure is similar between infants who underwent open hysterotomy and those who had fetoscopic spina bifida repair, and changes seen over time were also comparable between the two groups. These findings support the safety of using CO 2 gas for uterine insufflation during fetoscopic spina bifida repair. What are the clinical implications of this work?The findings of this study add to the body of evidence supporting the use of CO 2 for uterine insufflation in fetoscopic myelomeningocele repair. Fetoscopic techniques are safer for the mother and the fetus than is open repair. As a shift in practice towards fetoscopic repair is expected, evidence for the safety of CO 2 use is of critical relevance. ABSTRACTObjective To compare prenatal and postnatal brain microstructure between infants that underwent fetoscopic myelomeningocele (MMC) repair and those that had open-hysterotomy repair. Methods This was a longitudinal retrospective cohort study of 57 fetuses that met the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) trial criteria and underwent prenatal MMC repair, by a fetoscopic (n = 27) or open-hysterotomy (n = 30) approach, atResults There were no differences in GA at surgery or GA/postnatal age at MRI between the groups. No significant differences were observed in ADC values in any of the brain areas assessed between the open-repair and fetoscopic-repair groups at 6 weeks after surgery and in the first year after birth. No differences were detected in the ADC values of the studied areas between the control 88 Sanz Cortes et al. and prenatally repaired groups, except for significantly increased ADC values in the genu of the corpus callosum in the open-hysterotomy and fetoscopic-repair groups. Additionally, there were no differences between the two prenatally repaired groups in the percentage change in ADC values at any of the time intervals analyzed. ConclusionsFetoscopic MMC repair has no detectable effect on brain microstructure when compared to babies repaired using an open-hysterotomy technique. CO 2 insufflation of the uterine cavity during fetoscopy does not seem to have any isolated deleterious effects on fetal brain microstructure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.