The online version of this article has a Supplementary Appendix. BackgroundBone marrow has been shown to be superior to peripheral blood, as a stem cell source, in young patients (<20 years of age) with acquired aplastic anemia undergoing a matched sibling transplant. The aim of this study was to test whether this currently also holds true for older patients with acquired aplastic anemia. Design and MethodsWe analyzed 1886 patients with acquired aplastic anemia who received a first transplant from a human leukocyte antigen identical sibling between 1999 and 2009, with either bone marrow (n=1163) or peripheral blood (n=723) as the source of stem cells. ResultsIn multivariate Cox analysis negative predictors for survival were: patient's age over 20 years (RR 2.0, P<0.0001), an interval between diagnosis and transplantation of more than 114 days (RR 1.3, P=0.006), no anti-thymocyte globulin in the conditioning (RR 1.6, P=0.0001), a conditioning regimen other than cyclophosphamide (RR=1.3, P=0.008) and the use of peripheral blood as the source of stem cells (RR 1.6, P<0.00001). The survival advantage for recipients of bone marrow rather than peripheral blood was statistically significant in patients aged 1-19 years (90% versus 76% P<0.00001) as well as in patients aged over 20 years (74% versus 64%, P=0.001). The advantage for recipients of bone marrow over peripheral blood was maintained above the age of 50 years (69% versus 39%, P=0.01). Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease were more frequent in peripheral blood transplants. Major causes of death were graft-versus-host disease (2% versus 6% in bone marrow and peripheral blood recipients, respectively), infections (6% versus 13%), and graft rejection (1.5% versus 2.5%). ConclusionsThis study shows that bone marrow should be the preferred stem cell source for matched sibling transplants in acquired aplastic anemia, in patients of all age groups.

The aim was to determine whether outcome of unrelated donor transplantation for severe aplastic anemia has improved in recent years and whether this is due to patient selection or better transplant technology. We analyzed 498 patients transplanted during 1990-2005. By running univariate regression models dichotomizing year of transplantation we defined 1998 as the year of the most significant change in survival. Five-year survival increased from 3278% before 1998 to 5778% after 1998 (Po0.0001). When comparing the cohort before (n ¼ 149) and after 1998 (n ¼ 349), there were no differences except for older age, and more frequent use of PBSCs, after 1998. High-resolution HLA typing data were unavailable. After 1998, there was less graft failure (11 vs 26%, Po0.0001), less acute GvHD (cumulative incidence 28 vs 37%, P ¼ 0.02) and less chronic GvHD (22 vs 38%, P ¼ 0.004). In multivariate analyses adjusting for differences in age, HLA-mismatch, performance score and time to transplantation, there was no change in the year of transplant effect (relative risk of death in transplants after 1998: 0.44 (95% confidence interval 0.33-0.59)). There is no evidence for patient selection to explain significantly improved survival in patients transplanted after 1998. We speculate that this is due to better donor matching.

No abstract

No abstract