Summaryobjectives To assess over-the-counter antimicrobial dispensing by drug retailers in Kathmandu, Nepal, for rationality, safety, and compliance with existing government regulations.methods Standardized cases of dysuria in a young adult male and acute watery diarrhoea in a child were presented by a mock patient to retailers at 100 randomly selected pharmacies. Questions asked by retailers and advice and medications given at their initiative were recorded.results All retailers engaged in diagnostic and therapeutic behaviour beyond their scope of training or legal mandate. Historical information obtained by retailers was inadequate to determine the nature or severity of disease or appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy. 97% (95% CI ϭ 91.5-99.4%) of retailers dispensed unnecessary antimicrobials in diarrhoea, while only 44% (95% CI ϭ 34.1-54.3%) recommended oral rehydration therapy and only 3% (95% CI ϭ 0.6-8.5%) suggested evaluation by a physician. 38% (95% CI ϭ 28.5-48.2%) gave antimicrobials in dysuria, yet only 4% (95% CI ϭ 1.1-9.9%) adequately covered cystitis. None covered upper urinary tract or sexually transmitted infections, conditions which could not be ruled out based on the interviews, and only 7% (95% CI ϭ 2.9-13.9%) referred for a medical history and physical examination necessary to guide therapy.conclusions Although legislation in Nepal mandates a medical prescription for purchase of antibiotics, unauthorized dispensing is clearly problematic. Drug retailers in our study did not demonstrate adequate understanding of the disease processes in question to justify their use of these drugs. Risks of such indiscretion include harm to individual patients as well as spread of antimicrobial resistance. More intensive efforts to educate drug retailers on their role in dispensing, along with increased enforcement of existing regulations, must be pursued.

Standardized monitoring of antibiotic use underpins the effective implementation of antimicrobial stewardship interventions in combatting antimicrobial resistance (AMR). To date, few studies have assessed antibiotic use in hospitals in Uganda to identify gaps that require intervention. This study applied the World Health Organization’s standardized point prevalence survey methodology to assess antibiotic use in 13 public and private not-for-profit hospitals across the country. Data for 1077 patients and 1387 prescriptions were collected between December 2020 and April 2021 and analyzed to understand the characteristics of antibiotic use and the prevalence of the types of antibiotics to assess compliance with Uganda Clinical Guidelines; and classify antibiotics according to the WHO Access, Watch, and Reserve classification. This study found that 74% of patients were on one or more antibiotics. Compliance with Uganda Clinical Guidelines was low (30%); Watch-classified antibiotics were used to a high degree (44% of prescriptions), mainly driven by the wide use of ceftriaxone, which was the most frequently used antibiotic (37% of prescriptions). The results of this study identify key areas for the improvement of antimicrobial stewardship in Uganda and are important benchmarks for future evaluations.

ObjectiveBacterial meningitis is a medical emergency associated with high mortality rates. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture is the “gold standard” for diagnosis of meningitis and it is important to establish the susceptibility of the causative microorganism to rationalize treatment. The Namibia Standard Treatment Guidelines (STGs) recommends initiation of empirical antibiotic treatment in patients with signs and symptoms of meningitis after taking a CSF sample for culture and sensitivity. The objective of this study was to assess the antimicrobial sensitivity patterns of microorganisms isolated from CSF to antibiotics commonly used in the empirical treatment of suspected bacterial meningitis in Namibia.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional descriptive study of routinely collected antibiotic susceptibility data from the Namibia Institute of Pathology (NIP) database. Results of CSF culture and sensitivity from January 1, 2009 to May 31, 2012, from 33 state hospitals throughout Namibia were analysed.ResultsThe most common pathogens isolated were Streptococcus species, Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus, and Escherichia coli. The common isolates from CSF showed high resistance (34.3% –73.5%) to penicillin. Over one third (34.3%) of Streptococcus were resistance to penicillin which was higher than 24.8% resistance in the United States. Meningococci were susceptible to several antimicrobial agents including penicillin. The sensitivity to cephalosporins remained high for Streptococcus, Neisseria, E. coli and Haemophilus. The highest percentage of resistance to cephalosporins was seen among ESBL K. pneumoniae (n = 7, 71%–100%), other Klebsiella species (n = 7, 28%–80%), and Staphylococcus (n = 36, 25%–40%).ConclusionsThe common organisms isolated from CSF were Streptococcus Pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus, and E. coli. All common organisms isolated from CSF showed high sensitivity to cephalosporins used in the empirical treatment of meningitis. The resistance of the common isolates to penicillin is high. Most ESBL K. pneumoniae were isolated from CSF samples drawn from neonates and were found to be resistant to the antibiotics recommended in the Namibia STGs. Based on the above findings, it is recommended to use a combination of aminoglycoside and third-generation cephalosporin to treat non–ESBL Klebsiella isolates. Carbapenems (e.g., meropenem) and piperacillin/tazobactam should be considered for treating severely ill patients with suspected ESBL Klebsiella infection. Namibia should have a national antimicrobial resistance surveillance system for early detection of antibiotics that may no longer be effective in treating meningitis and other life-threatening infections due to resistance.

Although some hospital-based data are available, there are no large scale or nationwidedata available on the problem of pesticide poisoning in Nepal. This study wasdone to fill up this gap to some extent and was carried out at five major hospitals ofNepal - Bir Hospital, Patan Hospital and Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital(TUTH) in Kathmandu, Western Regional Hospital (WRH) in Pokhara, and B. P.Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS) in Dharan. A harmonized PesticideExposure Record (PER), which was finalized during the "WHO Regional Workshopon Pesticide Poisoning Database in SEAR Countries" held in 1999 in Delhi,1 was usedin the study. Data collection was done for a period of six months in each of the fivehospitals.Altogether there were 256 patients in the present study. There were 98 patients fromBir hospital, 48 from Patan hospital, 45 from TUTH, 36 from BPKIHS, and 29 fromWRH. Of the 256 patients, 112 were males and 144 females. The most common agegroup involved in pesticide poisoning was 15-24 years. In most of the cases patient'sarrival to hospital was within three hours after pesticide exposure. In the majority ofcases the nature of exposure was intentional and the route of exposure oral. Mostpoisonings occurred in urban set-up and at home.Organophosphorous compounds were found to be the most common pesticides involved(in >50% cases), followed by zinc phosphide and aluminium phosphide. All caseswere given first aid treatment in the Emergency Room of the study hospitals, followingwhich most of the cases (n=197) were admitted; the rest were discharged or referredto other hospitals. Systemic effects of poisoning were recorded to have been present in95% of cases. For nearly two-third (65.6%) of the cases the poisoning severity scorewas recorded in the PER as "moderate" or "severe." More than 16% of patients hadfatal outcome.Improved regulation on availability of pesticides, strict registration of vendors,modification in packaging of pesticides, adequate provision of information to thepublic, further research on pesticide poisoning (including community-based studies),creation and regular revision of national/local standard treatment guidelines (STGs),regular training of health care providers based on such STGs, better availability ofdrugs/antidotes, establishment of poison information centers, and enhanced regionallinkages are some of the measures that will help reduce the problem of pesticidepoisoning in Nepal.Key Words: Pesticide poisoning, Organophosphates, Zinc phosphide, Aluminiumphosphide, Pesticide exposure record, Hospital, Nepal.

The multi-faceted complexities of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) require consistent action, a multidisciplinary approach, and long-term political commitment. Building coalitions can amplify stakeholder efforts to carry out effective AMR prevention and control strategies. We have developed and implemented an approach to help local stakeholders kick-start the coalition-building process. The five-step process is to (1) mobilise support, (2) understand the local situation, (3) develop an action plan, (4) implement the plan, and (5) monitor and evaluate. We first piloted the approach in Zambia in 2004, then used the lessons learned to expand it for use in Ethiopia and Namibia and to the regional level through the Ecumenical Pharmaceutical Network [EPN]. Call-to-action declarations and workshops helped promote a shared vision, resulting in the development of national AMR action plans, revision of university curricula to incorporate relevant topics, infection control activities, engagement with journalists from various mass media outlets, and strengthening of drug quality assurance systems. Our experience with the coalition-building approach in Ethiopia, Namibia, Zambia, and with the EPN shows that coalitions can form in a variety of ways with many different stakeholders, including government, academia, and faith-based organisations, to organise actions to preserve the effectiveness of existing antimicrobials and contain AMR.