Advances in knowledge in transplantation have improved 1-year renal allograft survival in all age groups of pediatric patients. However, the results from many studies have shown that the long-term allograft survival is least successful in adolescent recipients. The major cause of late graft failure in adolescents can be contributed in large measure to medication noncompliance. Medication noncompliance in teenagers has been shown to be more than four times greater in adolescents than in adults. The teenage years are a time of transition from childhood to adulthood. Important tasks during this transition include the development of an autonomous identity that progresses to full independence. However, the cognitive skills and intellectual maturation of adolescents are still limited, and this is particularly true in adolescents with chronic diseases. They have difficulty with abstract thinking, particularly the conceptualization of future consequences of present actions. This leads to characteristic risk-taking behaviors, including noncompliance with medical treatments. This transition is more intricate for adolescents with chronic illness because of their physical limitations. There are a number of strategies that are helpful in mitigating noncompliance. Adolescents must be dealt with directly. Previous noncompliant behaviors need to be acknowledged and dealt with, because studies show that noncompliance is a "stable" personality attribute that persists over time. Efforts should be made to choose medications that have the least side effects. Psychological and psychiatric conditions such as posttraumatic stress disorder require early recognition, diagnosis, and treatment. It is necessary to build rapport with teenagers, and this should start before transplantation. A multidisciplinary approach with physicians, social workers, nurses, and transplant coordinators is an effective mean of enhancing compliance. These and other strategies outlined in this discussion will enable the adolescent to achieve good compliance rates and prevent graft loss.

The outcome of renal transplantation was examined in 52 pediatric patients (mean age 13 years) whose primary renal disease was obstructive uropathy. The bladder was used at transplantation in 45 allograft recipients, 39 of whom had had a previous lower urinary tract operation or bladder defunctionalization. An ileal loop was used in 7 recipients. The 52 patients received 73 renal allografts from 58 cadaver and 15 live-related donors. Presently, 40 patients (77 per cent) have functioning allografts, 4 have returned to dialysis and 8 (15 per cent) have died. The results indicate that the outcome of renal transplantation in patients with obstructive uropathy is similar to that of other transplant recipients. Damaged and defunctionalized bladders may be used successfully in most cases. If necessary an ileal conduit is an effective alternative. Post-transplant urologic complications occur with increased frequency but with appropriate management allograft salvage and patient survival are excellent.

This analysis demonstrates for the first time that, used in a stepwise fashion, ciprofloxacin and leflunomide are effective and safe treatments for BK viremia in PRTR.

FSGS has a high recurrence rate after renal transplantation. To examine the effects of the use of preemptive and post-transplant PP on recurrence and graft outcome, we conducted a retrospective study on 34 pediatric patients (mean age 13±5 yr) with biopsy-proven pretransplant FSGS and who underwent a renal transplantation between 1996 and 2007. Recurrence was defined as a serum albumin level of <3.0g/L in the presence of nephrotic-range proteinuria (>40mg/m(2) /h). Total response to PP therapy was defined as the resolution of the nephrotic-range proteinuria and partial response as persistent proteinuria despite PP but not in the nephrotic range. Fifteen patients received a LD renal transplantation and 19 patients received a DD renal transplantation. Nineteen patients received CsA and 14 patients received tacrolimus. Nineteen patients (56%) had FSGS recurrence. There was no difference in the recurrence rate between patients receiving CsA vs. tacrolimus. Among the 15 LD patients, 13 received preemptive PP (1-10 sessions) and seven patients (47%) had subsequent FSGS recurrence. Among the 19 DD patients, four received preemptive PP and 12 (63%) had FSGS recurrence. The number of preemptive PP did not affect the recurrence rate. In a group of patients with a previous graft loss secondary to recurrence, the rate of recurrence was lower than expected (40%) and two of the three patients who did not recur had three or more sessions of preemptive PP. Of the 19 patients with recurrence, 17 were treated with PP therapy and 88% of the patients fully or partially responded. Only five patients had graft loss at three yr post-transplant: two from FSGS recurrence and three from non-compliance. These results suggest that preemptive PP does not decrease the rate of recurrence after transplantation but might be beneficial in treating high-risk patients with documented recurrence. Patients with FSGS recurrence post-transplant can achieve good graft survival with both LD and DD transplantation.