BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESThe epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and natural course of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Saudi Arabia are still largely unknown. Hence, we decided to conduct a large retrospective, cohort study to determine these features of the disease.DESIGN AND SETTINGRetrospective study conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh from January 1970 to December 2008.PATIENTS AND METHODSWe reviewed all the cases of IBD diagnosed and collected all data pertaining to patients with IBD.RESULTSA total of 312 patients with IBD were included for this analysis, including 197 (63%) patients with Crohn disease (CD) and 115 (37%) patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The mean age (standard deviation) of patients with IBD was 25.5 (10.6) years; 152 (48.7%) were males and 160 females. The referral rate in the past 10 years was 72.1% compared with preceding 20 years, and 56% (n=178) of patients with IBD were from the central region of Saudi Arabia. The patients were followed up for a mean duration of 9.5 years; during their follow-up, 206 patients (66%) required hospital admission and 9 patients (2.9%) with UC developed colon cancer. A total of 6 patients died during the follow-up. Fifty-three percent (n=104) of the patients with CD underwent surgeries as part of their treatment, whereas only 20% (n=23) of the patients with UC underwent colectomy.CONCLUSIONSThe incidence of IBD has been gradually increasing in Saudi Arabia over the years. Clinical features and morbidity in patients are not different from patients with IBD seen in the West.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Knowledge of the predictors of sustained viral response (SVR) to pegylated interferon (PEG-INF) alfa-2a and ribavirin (RBV) therapy in patients with hepatitis C genotype-4 (HCV-4) is crucial for selecting patients who would benefit most from therapy. We assessed the predictors of SVR to this combination therapy in Saudi patients with chronic HCV-4 infection.PATIENTS AND METHODS:This retrospective study included 148 patients with HCV-4 infection who underwent clinical, biochemical and virological assessments before treatment and at 12, 24, 48 and 72 weeks post-treatment.RESULTS:Of the 148 patients, 90 (60.8%) were males. Mean (SD) for age was 48.5 (12.7) years and BMI was 27.9 (7.5) kg/m2. Seventy-nine of 148 (60.1%) patients were treatment naïve and 110 (74.3%) underwent pre-treatment liver biopsy. Eighteen (12.2%) patients did not complete therapy because of side effects or they were lost to follow up. Early virological response was achieved in 84 of 91 (92.3%) patients. In the 130 (87.8%) patients who completed therapy, 34 (26.2%) were non-responders and 96 (63.8%) achieved end-of-treatment virological response (ETVR). SVR and virological relapse (24 weeks after ETVR) occurred in 66/130 (50.7%) and 30/130 (31.2%) patients, respectively. Compared to relapsers, sustained responders were significantly younger (P=.005), non-diabetic (P=.005), had higher serum albumin (P=.028), lower alpha-fetoprotein level (P=.026), lower aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (P=.04) levels, and were treatment-naivve (P=.008). In a multivariate regression analysis, the independent predictors of SVR were younger age (P=.016), lower serum AST (P=.012), and being treatment naivve (P=.021).CONCLUSION:Approximately half of HCV-4 patients who complete the course of combination therapy achieve an SVR, especially if they are young, treatment naivve and have lower AST levels.

BIB is a safe, simple, and potentially efficient procedure that is well-tolerated by the majority of patients.

Background/Aim:This retrospective study assessed the efficacy, safety, and the predictors of sustained viral response (SVR) to a 48-week-course of peginterferon α-2a (Pegasys) and ribavirin combination therapy in 335 consecutive Saudi patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.Materials and Methods:Clinical, biochemical, and virological parameters were collected at time 0 (pretreatment) and at 12, 24, 48, and 72 weeks posttreatment. The mean ± SD age was 49.1 ± 13.0 years; 229 (68.4%) were males, mean ± SD body mass index was 27.8 ± 7.4, 85 (25.4%) were diabetic, 25 (7.5%) had renal impairment, 136 (40.6%) had previously received interferon ± ribavirin therapy, and 247 (73.7%) underwent pretreatment liver biopsy. Patients with genotypes 1, 2 or 3, 4 and mixed genotype were 60 (22.15%), 30 (11.0%), 148 (54.4%), and 34 (12.5%), respectively.Results:Early viral response (≥2-log10 HCV-RNA decline 12 weeks posttreatment) was achieved in 253 (75.3%). Patients who completed 48 weeks of treatment were 292 (87.1%); of these, 121 (75.6%) achieved ETVR, 161 (55.1%) continued to have SVR and 60 (20.5%) had a viral relapse following end-of-treatment response, that is 48.1 and 17.9% of all patients (n = 335), respectively. Nonresponders (NR) were 71 (24.3%) patients and 43 (12.8%) were unable to complete treatment (due to side effects or loss to follow up). Compared to the relapsers, patients with SVR were significantly younger (P = 0.000), nondiabetics (P = 0.015), had higher serum albumin (P = 0.007), had less pretreatment inflammatory grade (P = 0.011), infected with genotypes 2 or 3 (P = 0.014), and treatment-naïve patients (P = 0.001). However, in stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis, only treatment naiveté and low pretreatment inflammatory score were the independent predictors of SVR (P = 0.005 and P = 0.018, respectively).Conclusion:Combination therapy, if tolerated and completed, is effective in treating chronic HCV patients, especially those with no previous interferon therapy and lower pretreatment inflammatory grade.

Background/Objectives: Based on the synergistic effect between cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and between 5-FU and interferon-α, we conducted a trial to assess the response rate and toxicity of the combination of cisplatin, 5-FU and interferon-α in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were eligible. No prior chemotherapy or interferon were allowed. Patients received cisplatin 80 mg/m² on day 1, 5-FU 750 mg/m²/day by continuous intravenous infusion for 5 days, and interferon-α 5 × 10⁶ units/m²/day by subcutaneous injection on days 1–5 of each cycle. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for a total of 6 cycles. Results: Forty patients were enrolled. Median age was 57.5 years (range 30–70). 33 had squamous carcinoma and 7 adenocarcinoma; 15 were male; the locoregional metastatic ratio was 1:39; median ECOG performance status was 2 (range 1–3). Grade 3–4 toxicities were: leukopenia (9 cases), thrombocytopenia (4), electrolyte imbalance (11), febrile neutropenia (11), vomitting (5), diarrhea (4), and mucositis (11). There were 3 early deaths, most probably related to therapy. Five patients (13%) achieved a complete response and 17 (42%) achieved a partial response, yielding an overall response rate of 55%. Response rates for squamous and adeno histology were 61% and 29%, respectively. Median survival was 6.4 months. Conclusion: The combination of cisplatin, 5-FU and interferon-α produces a high response rate in advanced squamous cell esophageal carcinoma, but with considerable toxicity. A modified combination of the above agents is presently being evaluated at our institution.