BACKGROUND Conversion into androgen‐hypersensitive state and adaptation to the low concentration of androgen during ADT cause relapse of prostate cancer (PCa). It is important to identify differentially expressed genes between PCa and normal prostate tissues and to reveal the function of these genes that are involved in progression of PCa. METHODS We performed cDNA microarray analysis to identify differentially expressed genes, calcium/calmodulin‐dependent protein kinase kinase 2 (CAMKK2). Immunohistochemical analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between the CAMKK2 expression level and prognosis. The function of CAMKK2 was assessed by generating CAMKK2 overexpressed LNCaP cells and by knockdown of CAMKK2. RESULTS We identified CAMKK2 overexpressed six times in PCa more than normal prostate by cDNA microarray analysis. Immunohistochemical analysis of CAMKK2 protein showed that CAMKK2 protein was expressed more in PCa than normal tissue. However, the expression in the high‐grade PCa diminished. Moreover, the narrowness of CAMKK2‐positive area before ADT was a poor prognostic factor. Androgen‐deprivation treatment from the medium in which LNCaP cells were cultured in the presence of 10 nM DHT repressed CAMKK2 expression. CAMKK2 overexpressed LNCaP cells (LNCaP/GFP‐CAMKK2) attenuated androgen‐sensitivity. Tumorigenesis of LNCaP/GFP‐CAMKK2 cells in male SCID mice was decreased compared with control cells irrespective of castration. Finally, knockdown of CAMKK2 mRNA in LNCaP cells induced androgen‐hypersensitivity and stimulated LNCaP cell proliferation. CONCLUSIONS Induction of androgen‐hypersensitivity after ADT may be involved in down‐regulation of CAMKK2. This result may provide new therapeutic approach to keep androgen‐sensitivity of PCa after ADT. Prostate 72:1789–1801, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

BACKGROUND. The matricellular protein secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) plays an important role on tumor metastasis and progression in several cancers. However, the roles of SPARC in prostate cancer (PCa) remain unclear. METHODS. To identify SPARC protein in prostate tissue, immunohistochemical analysis of SPARC was conducted using human prostate tissue microarray. To detect SPARC expression in prostate cancer (LNCaP, DU145, and PC-3) and stromal cells, RT-PCR, western blot analysis, and ELISA was conducted. To reveal the function of exogenous SPARC in PCa cells, AKT phosphorylation was confirmed by western blot analysis after coculture with stromal cells. Proliferation and migration of PCa cells were examined by addition of SPARC. The interaction between SPARC and integrin b1 was confirmed by western blot analysis after immunoprecipitation. RESULTS. SPARC protein was expressed well in normal tissue compared with PCa tissue. ELISA showed high secreted SPARC protein in normal prostate-derived stromal cell (PrSC) compared with PCa-derived stromal cell (PCaSC) and PCa. PCa cells cocultured with PrSC showed reduced AKT phosphorylation more than with PCaSC. PCa cells cocultured with PrSC whose SPARC was knocked-down restored AKT phosphorylation. Moreover, PCa cells treated with SPARC led to reduced AKT phosphorylation. Immunoprecipitation with SPARC revealed interaction of SPARC and integrin b1 in PCa cells. Inhibited proliferation and migration of PCa cells by SPARC was restored by integrin b1 neutralizing antibody. CONCLUSIONS. Reduced SPARC secretion from stromal cells might affect PCa progression mediating through limiting AKT phosphorylation after interaction with integrin b1.

No abstract

Emergence of malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) has been reported as a sign of poor prognosis; however, the distribution of survival time in patients with MUO is considerably wide, and no risk classification score has been constructed. To evaluate whether a novel risk classification score for overall survival that we previously developed, is effective in a large cohort. Investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter diagnostic/prognostic study was conducted. Patients with MUO were divided into three risk groups based on the score calculated using four prognostic factors (PLaCT: Primary site, Laterality, serum Creatinine level, and Treatment for primary site) at the first visit, and prospective follow-up was performed. Overall survival and ureteral stent failure-free survival of each risk group were compared. In total, 300 patients with 21 different primary sites were enrolled. The numbers of patients in good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 105, 106, and 89, respectively. Median survival times of patients in good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 406, 221, and 77 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). In 217 patients with ureteral stenting, median ureteral stent failure-free survival times of good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 385, 183, and 57 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). Limitations include the limited ethnicity and the extended duration of study enrollment. The novel PLaCT risk classification score could divide MUO patients into three risk groups with distinct survival times and ureteral stent patencies. This score will aid in establishing prognosis and treatment strategy for all physicians engaged in cancer treatment.