No abstract

Study DesignProspective study.PurposeTo compare the efficacy of 24-hour and 72-hour antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing surgical site infections (SSIs).Overview of LiteratureAntimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical practice has become a universally accepted protocol for minimizing postoperative complications related to infections. Although prophylaxis is an accepted practice, a debate exists with regard to the antibiotic type and its administration duration for various surgical procedures.MethodsOur institute is a tertiary care hospital with more than 100 spinal surgeries per year for various spine disorders in the department of orthopedics. We conducted this prospective study in our department from June 2012 to January 2015. A total of 326 patients were enrolled in this study, with 156 patients in the 72-hour antibiotic prophylaxis group (group A) and 170 patients in the 24-hour group (group B). Cefazolin was the antibiotic used in both groups. Two surgeons were involved in conducting all the spinal procedures. Our study compared SSIs among patients undergoing instrumented spinal fusion.ResultsThe overall rate of SSIs was 1.8% with no statistical difference between the two groups.ConclusionsThe 24-hour antimicrobial prophylaxis is as effective as the 72-hour dosage in instrumented spinal fusion surgery.

Background:Surgical management of posttraumatic elbow stiffness has been reported with poor outcome following treatment. Sequential release in earlier stages of stiffness yielded much better results. The goal of our study was to assess the outcome in improvement of the range of motion of the elbow after surgical release and to analyze a tailor-made approach according to individual needs to yield good result.Materials and Methods:A prospective study was conducted in 47 cases of elbow stiffness due to various types of injuries. All the cases were treated with sequential release if there was no progress after adequate supervised conservative management except in unreduced dislocations. All the cases were followed up for a minimum period of 24 months. Overall outcome was rated with the functional scoring system by Mayo Clinic Performance Index.Results:Twenty-five (44.68%) out of 47 patients had excellent results with a mean preoperative range of motion of 33.9° and postoperative range of motion of 105° with net gain in range of motion of 71.1° (‘t’ test value is 19.27, P < 0.01). None of the patients had elbow instability. Patients not having heterotopic ossification, who underwent surgery from three to six months post injury had a mean gain of 73.5°. In patients who waited for more than six months had mean gain of 66.8°. However, the results in cases having heterotopic ossification followed a slightly different pattern. In cases where release was performed from three months to six months had mean gain of 77.5°. Cases in which release was performed after six months had gain of 57.1°.Conclusions:In cases of posttraumatic elbow stiffness after a failed initial conservative treatment, early arthrolysis with sequential surgical soft tissue release yields good result than delayed surgery.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent one of the most important complications occurring postoperatively following surgical procedures. The SSI incidence is higher following gastrointestinal (GI) surgeries compared to any other surgery. It contributes to the majority of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing GI surgeries. The accepted practice worldwide for the prevention and control of SSIs is providing antimicrobial prophylaxis. The appropriate antimicrobial and dose are chosen depending on the microbial flora, complications, and patient risk factors. The objective of this review was to determine the sufficient number of prophylactic antimicrobial doses that would be efficacious and safe in controlling the SSIs following GI oncological surgeries. Single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis has shown the same efficacy as the multipledose antimicrobial regimen in controlling SSIs in esophageal, gastric, and colorectal surgeries. The advantages of a single-dose regimen include less chance of emergence of resistance, less chance for allergies or toxicity, and less cost. The addition of metronidazole with single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery should be considered due to its beneficial effect in further reducing infections. Further randomized controlled trials are needed for the literature to determine the efficacy and safety of single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing esophageal and colorectal surgeries. In addition, studies are required to determine the individual effectiveness of metronidazole in controlling SSIs in colorectal surgeries.

Over the years, elucidating targets from the neural circuits that can be used to treat disorders pertaining to the nervous system and extending their scope to other systems have always proved interesting to researchers. The role of various peptides and neurotransmitters has been elucidated and is being developed as therapeutic targets. Out of these, orexins are neuropeptides produced in the hypothalamus that stimulate a specific type of G-Protein coupled receptors (GPCR) called orexin receptors and bring about various physiological and pathological roles. Orexin receptors are of interest not only because of their wide applications such as insomnia, obesity, and inflammatory disorders but also because of their contribution to promising aspects of drug discovery such as optogenetics and their tremendous growth from the stage of being orphans to orexins. This review will discuss in detail the structure of orexin receptors, their physiological role, and various applications in disease states adding a note on agonists and antagonists and finally summarizing the recent drug approvals in the field. K E Y W O R D Sagonist, antagonist, orexin system, physiological role | INTRODUCTIONOrexins are neuropeptides involved in regulating many essential physiological functions like sleep-wake transitions, energy metabolism, cognition, and motivation.After 20 years, discovering and delineating the role of orexinergic therapeutics has stopped in research labs but this research has successfully contributed two drugs used in clinic, namely, suvorexant and lemborexant.This review will summarize the critical aspects of the orexinergic system and function and discuss the different applications of orexin receptors as drug targets. It will conclude by discussing the different agonists and antagonists at the receptor and its future prospects.