Here we describe the comprehensive gene expression profiles of each cell type composing normal breast tissue and in situ and invasive breast carcinomas using serial analysis of gene expression. Based on these data, we determined that extensive gene expression changes occur in all cell types during cancer progression and that a significant fraction of altered genes encode secreted proteins and receptors. Despite the dramatic gene expression changes in all cell types, genetic alterations were detected only in cancer epithelial cells. The CXCL14 and CXCL12 chemokines overexpressed in tumor myoepithelial cells and myofibroblasts, respectively, bind to receptors on epithelial cells and enhance their proliferation, migration, and invasion. Thus, chemokines may play a role in breast tumorigenesis by acting as paracrine factors.

The identification of tumor-suppressor genes in solid tumors by classical cancer genetics methods is difficult and slow. We combined nonsense-mediated RNA decay microarrays 1 and array-based comparative genomic hybridization 2,3 for the genome-wide identification of genes with biallelic inactivation involving nonsense mutations and loss of the wild-type allele. This approach enabled us to identify previously unknown mutations in the receptor tyrosine kinase gene EPHB2. The DU 145 prostate cancer cell line, originating from a brain metastasis, carries a truncating mutation of EPHB2 and a deletion of the remaining allele. Additional frameshift, splice site, missense and nonsense mutations are present in clinical prostate cancer samples. Transfection of DU 145 cells, which lack functional EphB2, with wild-type EPHB2 suppresses clonogenic growth. Taken together with studies indicating that EphB2 may have an essential role in cell migration and maintenance of normal tissue architecture, our findings suggest that mutational inactivation of EPHB2 may be important in the progression and metastasis of prostate cancer.Inactivation of tumor-suppressor genes (TSGs) in cancer is often a two-step process 4 involving mutation of the target gene and loss of the wild-type allele. Mapping of chromosomal deletions and losses of heterozygosity in cancer cells has been widely applied to guide the identification of TSGs. On its own, however, this approach is slow, labor-intensive and complicated by genomic instability, which often leads to numerous candidate regions for further study. In an alternative approach, the nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) mechanism, which normally targets transcripts with nonsense mutations for rapid degradation 5,6 , is blocked to cause the differential stabilization of genes that contain truncating mutations. This approach, coupled with microarrays to measure transcript levels after NMD inhibition, has been proposed for the genome-wide identification of mutated genes in cell lines 1 .Here we combined results from NMD microarray experiments highlighting putative nonsense mutations with high-resolution data on deleted genomic regions in cancer cell lines obtained with arraybased comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) 2,3 . We applied this integrated approach, which focuses on biallelic gene inactivation events, to the identification of candidate TSGs in prostate cancer.We pretreated the DU 145, PC-3 and LNCaP prostate cancer cell lines with emetine (which inhibits the NMD pathway) and then exposed them to actinomycin D to block new mRNA synthesis and to distinguish post-transcriptional shifts in mRNA stability, which indicate the presence of a nonsense mutation. We used cDNA microarrays to measure changes in transcript levels in cells treated with emetine versus untreated cells. We also carried out corresponding analyses with nonmalignant control cells to distinguish drug-induced gene expression changes from mutation-induced transcript stabilization events. We used known nonsense mutations, including the C39X...

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the distal half of chromosome arm 11q is frequent in a variety of human tumors, including breast cancer, and is often associated with poor prognosis. In an ongoing attempt to locate and characterize the main target genes within this chromosome region, we first looked for aberrations in known genes either suggested to be involved in tumorigenesis or shown to suppress tumor formation. We examined 31 primary breast tumors showing LOH in 11q21-24 for mutations in the MRE11A, CHK1, PPP2R1B, and TSLC1 genes. The absence of intragenic alterations related to cancer led us next to evaluate possible gene silencing resulting from promoter region CpG hypermethylation, using the bisulfite sequencing technique. In addition to the four genes mentioned above, we also analyzed the ATM gene, which had been investigated for certain germline mutations in an earlier study. Only the TSLC1 promoter region exhibited aberrant methylation patterns, and altogether 33% (10/30) of the successfully analyzed tumors showed evidence of elevated levels of TSLC1 CpG methylation. Ten percent (3/30) of the tumors showed significantly increased methylation. Thus, as has been shown in lung and some other forms of cancer, hypermethylation of the TSLC1 promoter region is also frequently a second hit along with LOH in breast cancer.