The data from this exploratory study suggest that the accumulation of molecular events seems to influence the outcome of HL, particularly in the low-IPS group.
Background:Although chemotherapy is the cornerstone treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), acquired chemoresistance is common and constitutes the main reason for treatment failure. Monoclonal antibodies against insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) have been tested in pre-treated mCRC patients, but results have been largely deceiving.Methods:We analysed time to progression, overall survival, and the mutational status of RAS, BRAF and nuclear p-IGF-1R expression by immunohistochemistry, in 470 metastatic CRC patients. The effect of IGF-1R activation and distribution was also assessed using cellular models of CRC and RNAi for functional validation.Results:Nuclear IGF-1R increased in metastatic tumours compared to paired untreated primary tumours, and significantly correlated with poor overall survival in mCRC patients. In vitro, chemo-resistant cell lines presented significantly higher levels of IGF-1R expression within the nuclear compartment, and PIAS3, a protein implicated also in the sumoylation process of intranuclear proteins, contributed to IGF-1R nuclear sequestration, highlighting the essential role of PIAS3 in this process. Intriguingly, we observed that ganitumab, an IGF-1R blocking-antibody used in several clinical trials, and dasatinib, an SRC inhibitor, increased the nuclear localisation of IGF-1R.Conclusions:Our study demonstrates that IGF-1R nuclear location might lead to chemotherapy and targeted agent resistance.
Both subtype classifications yielded prognostic and predictive information. HR +/HER2- patients (and Luminal A patients) had a significantly better outcome than the other subgroups of patients. The superiority of FEC-P over FEC was clearly more marked in HR-/HER2- patients (TN patients), particularly in the subset with basal phenotype (TN and either EGFR+ or cytokeratins 5/6+). The Luminal A subtype also achieved a significant benefit with FEC-P. The molecular-defined subgroup of TN was clearly predictive of better response to treatment with FEC-P. Luminal A patients had the best prognosis and also have a better outcome with weekly paclitaxel.
Purpose: Despite major advances in the treatment of classic Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL), f30% of patientsinadvancedstagesmayeventuallydie as resultof the disease,andcurrentmethods topredict prognosis are ratherunreliable.Thus, the applicationof robust techniques for theidentificationofbiomarkers associated with treatment response is essentialif new predictive tools are to be developed. Experimental Design: We used gene expression data from advanced cHL patients to identify transcriptional patterns from the tumoral cells and their nonneoplastic microenvironment, associated with lack of maintained treatment response. Gene-Set Enrichment Analysis was used to identify functionalpathways associated withunfavorable outcome that were significantly enrichedin either the Hodgkin's and Reed-Sternberg cells (regulation of the G 2 -M checkpoint, chaperones, histone modification, and signalingpathways) or the reactive cellmicroenvironment (mainly representedby specificT-cell populations and macrophage activation markers). Results:To explore the pathways identified previously, we used a series of 52 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded advanced cHL samples and designed a real-time PCR-based low-density array that included the most relevant genes. A large majority of the samples (82.7%) and all selected genes were analyzed successfully with this approach. Conclusions:The results of this assay can be combined in a single risk score integrating these biologicalpathways associated with treatment response and eventually usedina larger series to develop a new molecular outcome predictor for advanced cHL.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.