PurposeBusulfan is used as a conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and is known to cause seizures as a side effect. As various anticonvulsant drugs have been reported, we conducted a retrospective investigation regarding the preventive effects and adverse events associated with different anticonvulsants administered alongside intravenous busulfan (ivBu) in our institution.MethodsWe targeted 104 patients who received ivBu at our institution from May 1, 2010 to April 30, 2017. We investigated the seizure prevention rate and adverse events rate under anticonvulsant prophylaxis.ResultsThere were 70 cases (67.3%) of phenytoin administration and 34 cases (32.7%) of levetiracetam administration for anticonvulsant therapy. The seizure prevention rate was 98.6% for phenytoin and 100% for levetiracetam; seizures occurred in one out of 104 patients. There were no significant differences in the seizure prevention rate depending on the type of anticonvulsant. Further, there were no differences in adverse events.ConclusionsAnticonvulsant prophylaxis is considered necessary for safe conditioning with ivBu. Adverse events associated with the use of levetiracetam are within an acceptable range. Further, levetiracetam is considered useful as a preventive drug against seizures during ivBu administration because it is easy to administer and has ideal pharmacokinetics for supportive care.

Objective Application of topical moisturizing preparations is important for the prevention and palliation of hand-foot skin reaction induced by multi-kinase inhibitor. Application adherence of topical moisturizing preparations in clinical practice has rarely been reported. This study investigated the factors affecting adherence to the application of topical moisturizing preparations in patients administered regorafenib. Methods The subjects were patients administered regorafenib ( n = 118). Consumption of a urea-based moisturizing ointment, hand-foot skin reaction grade (CTC-AE ver 3.0), treatment duration, and dose of regorafenib, factors that might affect the onset of symptoms and adherence, including age, sex, presence of a key person, working status, performance status, past use of capecitabine or epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies, and relative dose intensity were retrospectively investigated. The adherence to the topical moisturizing ointment (<21 g per week) was judged as poor. The data were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. Results Working status was associated with poor adherence, showing a positive correlation (odds ratio; 3.024, p = 0.023). In contrast, symptom grade of hand-foot skin reaction and regorafenib relative dose intensity showed negative correlation with poor adherence (odds ratio; 0.971, p = 0.012, and 0.485, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions The results suggest that adherence decreases in patients with working. The relative dose intensity of regorafenib decreased when adherence to topical moisturizing ointments decreased. Severe hand-foot skin reaction could be associated with adherence. Patients consciously might not apply the ointment when hand-foot skin reaction did not become severe. It will be problematic for medical personnel to motivate patients for improving adherence to the use of moisturizing ointments.

No abstract

Background Dermatopathy develops as a side effect in patients receiving anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody treatment. Topical moisturizers are used for the prevention and treatment of this dermatopathy. Active participation of patients in their own treatment is important for the appropriate application of topical preparations. We prepared a pharmaceutical instructional video for adhering to the topical application protocol. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of this pharmaceutical instructional video on treatment adherence. Methods Study participants were patients with cancer receiving the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody for the first time. A pharmacist instructed the patients on how to use the pharmaceutical instruction video. Daily topical preparation use following the video demonstration was assessed. The effectiveness of the pharmaceutical instruction video was evaluated by assessing the adherence of patients who did not use the pharmaceutical instruction video for the past 2 periods (26 months; controls 1 and 2). The incidence of side effects was compared between the two control groups and the group of patients who received the pharmaceutical instruction video. Results The amount of topical preparation consumed (median, g/day) by patients who received patient compliance instructions using the pharmaceutical instruction video was 9.8 g/day, as compared with control group 1 (4.5 g/day) and control group 2 (5.5 g/day) ( p <  0.001). There was no difference in the incidence of side effects during the three periods. Conclusion The use of visual instructional media for patient compliance by pharmacists may be effective in maintaining and improving treatment adherence.

The incidence of delirium after the commencement of fentanyl injection was significantly lower, suggesting that fentanyl is a useful opioid injection drug from the perspective of delirium risk.