Different aspects of bilingualism have been studied all over the world,
and the studies have looked at a wide range of topics in spoken-
language bilinguals such as patterns of code switching, the role of
code switching in community life, the success or failure of bilingual
education, second-language learning and gender, as well as many
other issues focusing on single-modality bilinguals. These studies are
often not applicable to studies of bimodal bilingualism, in which the
subjects know a sign language from birth and the spoken language of
the larger, hearing society. The study of bilingualism in hearing people
from deaf families offers an opportunity to analyze the way that
native users of both a signed and a spoken language combine aspects
of both languages simultaneously (code blending). The lower status
of American Sign Language (ASL) in relation to English may also
contribute to how bimodal bilinguals view and use their languages.
Unlike spoken-language bilinguals, who must stop one language before
beginning another, a bimodal bilingual is able to speak and sign
at the same time. This linguistic capability informs and expands the
field of bilingualism as well as areas such as discourse analysis and the
role of code blending as a cultural identifier. This preliminary research
focuses on emails taken from a forum on the Internet for hearing
people with deaf parents. Two hundred and seventy five lines
from one hundred emails were collected and analyzed. The study
shows evidence of strong grammatical influence from ASL in these
emails (an absence of overt subjects, overt objects, determiners, copulas,
and prepositions) as well as unique structures (nonstandard verb
inflections, overgeneralization of the letters, and syntactic calquing).
There is also a strong tendency to use English to �describe� an ASL sign (i.e., �My father fork-in-throat�).
The meaning of the sign fork-in-throat is �stuck,� but the bilingual chooses to use the visual description of the
sign instead of the lexical equivalent in English (note the absence of
the copula). The overall results of this analysis are compared to Internet
Relay Chat and TDD writings.
Rule-governed behavior is generally considered an integral component of complex verbal repertoires (Skinner, 1974) but has rarely been the subject of empirical research. In particular, little or no previous research has attempted to establish rulegoverned behavior in individuals who do not already posses the repertoire. This study consists of two experiments which evaluated multiple exemplar training procedures for teaching a simple component skill which may be necessary for developing a repertoire of rule-governed behavior. In both experiments, children with autism were taught to respond to simple rules which specified antecedents and the behaviors which should occur in their presence. In the first study, participants were taught to respond to rules containing "if/then" statements, where the antecedent was specified before the behavior. The second experiment was a replication and extension of the first. It involved a variation on the manner in which rules were presented. Both experiments eventually demonstrated generalization to novel rules for all participants, however variations to the standard procedure were required for several participants. Results suggest that rule-following can be analyzed and taught as generalized operant behavior and implications for future research are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.