The questionnaires were easy to complete and changes in sexuality and information needs were identified. The NSCS-CHF needs further validation as a research instrument. Healthcare professionals can use both questionnaires to bring up the topic of sexuality and to identify topics that require further discussion or counselling with patients and partners.
Objective: Cost-of-illness studies in Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD) have mainly been limited to hospitalizations. This is the first paper to provide a comprehensive overview from a societal perspective including inpatient and outpatient medical costs, and absenteeism-and unemployment-related societal costs. Methods: A retrospective longitudinal (2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015) database analysis was performed in Belgium combining administrative and clinical databases (n = 10,572). Trends in resource use and costs per patient year were standardized to assess the impact of changes in the patient population composition. Generalized Linear Mixed Models assessed the impact of age, sex, lesion complexity, and time. Costs were converted to 2018 values. Results: Medical costs per patient year increased from V3490 to V4536 with a milder increase in patients with severe lesions. Although unemployment-related costs decreased, total societal costs increased due to more long-term (≥1 yr) invalidity. An increase in long-term invalidity was particularly found in patients ≥30 yrs and in patients with mild or moderate lesions. Resource use (e.g., dental care, nursing care, physiotherapy, emergency department) increased substantially in all patient groups over time. The annual percentage of patients with severe lesions receiving any cardiac and specialized cardiac follow-up increased with respectively 11 and 13 percent points to 81% and 52%, with a simultaneous decrease in hospitalization rate. Conclusion: Medical cost increases in ACHD are most pronounced in patients with mild and moderate lesions, relatable to their higher age. Economic data are necessary to allocate
Background:The growing adult congenital heart disease (CHD) population requires efficient healthcare organisation. It has been suggested that clinically appropriate care be provided for individual patients on the least complex level possible, in order to alleviate saturation of special care programmes.Methods:Semi-structured interviews with 10 general and 10 adult CHD cardiologists were conducted to elucidate opinions on healthcare organisation in Belgium. A particular focus was placed on the potential role of general cardiologists. The software program NVivo 12 facilitated thematic analysis.Results:A discrepancy existed between how general cardiologists thought about congenital care and what adult CHD cardiologists considered the minimum knowledge required to adequately treat patients. Qualitative data were categorised under the following themes: knowledge dissemination, certification, (de)centralisation of care, the role of adult CHD cardiologists, the role of dedicated nurse specialists, and patient referral. It appeared to be pivotal to organise care in such a way that providing basic care locally does not impede the generation of sufficient patient volume, and to continue improving communications between different care levels when there is no referral back. Moreover, practical knowledge is best disseminated locally. Cardiologists’ opinions on certification and on the role of dedicated nurse specialists were mixed.Conclusion:On the basis of the results, we propose five recommendations for improving the provision of care to adults with CHD. A multidimensional approach to defining the role of different healthcare professionals, to improving communication channels, and to effectively sensitising healthcare professionals is needed to improve the organisation of care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.