The primary structure of ovine hypothalamic hypophysiotropic luteinizing hormone-releasing factor, LRF, has been established as pGlu-His-Trp-SerTyr-Gly-Leu-Arg-Pro-Gly-NH2 by hydrolysis of the peptide with chymotrypsin or pyrrolidone-earboxylylpeptidase and by analysis of the products by an Edman-dansylation sequencing technique, as well as by mass spectrometry of the derived phenylthiohydantoins. A decapeptide with the proposed primary structure, prepared by total synthesis, gave the same result on sequencing. The synthetic decapeptide possesses the same biological activities as the native ovine LRF. The amino-acid sequence of ovine LRF is identical to that already published for porcine LRF.Various areas of the central nervous system participate in the fine regulation of the secretion of all adenohypophysial hormones. The ultimate integrator of information originating in the central nervous system is the hypothalamus. The final information from the hypothalamus to the adenohypophysis is not transmitted in the form of nerve impulses, but is carried in the form of specific hypothalamic hypophysiotropic substances, the hypothalamic releasing factors, that are carried through the hypothalamo-hypophysial portal system of capillaries from the median eminence region of the ventral hypothalamus to the cells of the adenohypophysis. There is good physiological evidence that such a hypothalamic control is involved in the secretion of the gonadotropin, luteinizing hormone. In the early 1960s, several investigators reported experimental results that were best explained by proposing the existence of substances that specifically stimulated the secretion of luteinizing hormone, and that were probably polypeptides, in crude aqueous extracts of hypothalamic tissues of various mammalian species (1-3). Preparations of LRF, active at 1 /Ag per dose in animal bioassays, were obtained by gel filtration and ion-exchange chromatography on carboxymethylcellulose (4), an observation that was confirmed by similar methods by several investigators (5, 6). In spite of the vagaries of the various bioassay methods available, several laboratories reported preparations of LRF of increased potency (5, 6). Several of these early publications led to contradictory statements regarding purification and separation of LH-releasing factor (LRF), from a follicle-stimulating hormone releasing factor (5, 7). Two laboratories independently reported the isolation of porcine LRF (8) and ovine LRF (9), both groups concluding that LRF from either species was a nonapeptide containing, on the basis of acid hydrolysis, 1 His, 1 Arg, 1 Ser, 1 Glu, 1 Pro, 2 Gly, 1 Leu, 1 Tyr. Earlier results with the pyrrolidone-carboxylylpeptidase prepared by Fellows and Mudge (10) had led us to conclude (11) that the Nterminal residue of LRF was Glu in its cyclized pyroglutamic (pGlu) form, as in the case of hypothalamic TRF, (pGluHis-Pro-NH2).While our own studies on the amino-acid sequence of ovine LRF were in progress, Matsuo et al. (12) reported that porcine LRF contai...
Two analogs of the hypothalamic luteinizing hormone releasing factor modified at the histidine-2 position were tested for biological activity (secretion of luteinizing hormone) in cultures of dispersed rat anterior pituitary cells. The analog in which glycine was substituted for histidine at position 2, [Gly(2)]LRF, behaves as a partial agonist releasing less than 50 percent of the luteinizing hormone secreted at maximum concentrations of the releasing factor, while the analog in which histidine at position 2 is deleted has no significant agonist activity at any of the doses tested. When added to the cultured cells at molar ratios 10(3) to 10(4) times that of the luteinizing hormone releasing factor, both analogs decrease the amount of luteinizing hormone secreted in response to the releasing factor.
The role of the liver nerves in the disposition of peripherally administered glucose was examined in seven hepatic innervated (HI) and nine hepatic denervated (HD) 42-h-fasted conscious dogs. After a 40-min basal period, there was a 4-h experimental period during which the hepatic glucose load was increased twofold via peripheral glucose infusion. Somatostatin was infused to suppress pancreatic endocrine secretion, and insulin and glucagon were infused intraportally to produce a fourfold increase in insulin and a gradual decrease (approximately 25%) in glucagon. The area under the curve of net hepatic glucose uptake (NHGU) during the glucose infusion period totaled 483 +/- 82 and 335 +/- 32 mg/kg in HD and HI, respectively (P < 0.05). The area under the curve of the hepatic fractional extraction of glucose was 27% greater in HD (P < 0.05). Net hepatic lactate output was similar in the two groups, and net hepatic glycogen synthesis was 3.8 +/- 0.8 vs. 2.7 +/- 0.5 mg.kg dog wt-1.min-1 in HD and HI, respectively (P = 0.13). The direct pathway of glycogen synthesis was responsible for 54-58% of net hepatic glycogen synthesis in both HI and HD (n = 6 for both). In summary 1) NHGU in response to peripheral glucose infusion was approximately 44% greater in HD than in HI, 2) net hepatic glycogen synthesis was enhanced by 41% in HD although the probability of this change was 0.13, and 3) the contribution of the direct pathway to glycogen synthesis was the same in HD and HI. These data are consistent with a role for the liver nerves in regulating the magnitude of NHGU in response to glucose administration. They also indicate that the absence of liver nerves may reduce glycogen turnover during glucose infusion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.