No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Objectives: To determine the combination of urinary protein markers for noninvasive detection of primary and recurrent urothelial bladder carcinomas. Methods: Urinary concentrations of 27 biomarkers (NSE, ATT, AFABP, Resistin, Midkine, Clusterin, Uromodulin, ZAG2, HSP27, HSP 60, NCAM1/CD56, Angiogenin, Calreticulin, Chromogranin A, CEACAM1, CXCL1, IL13Ra2, Progranulin, VEGFA, CarbAnhydIX, Annexin-V, TIM4, Galectin1, Cystatin B, Synuclein G, ApoA1 and ApoA2) were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or by electrochemiluminiscence immunoassay. Results: During the primary diagnostics, a group of 70 patients with primary occurrence of bladder cancer and 49 healthy control subjects were compared. For this clinical situation, the most accurate combination proved to be the combination of cytology with markers Midkine and Synuclein G (sensitivity 91.8%, specificity 97.5%). During the monitoring of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), a group of 44 patients with cancer recurrence was compared with the group of 61 patients with a history of NMIBC without current disease. For this clinical situation, the most accurate combination proved to be the combination of cytology and erythrocytes count in urine sediment with markers Midkine, ZAG2, CEACAM1, and Synuclein G (sensitivity 92.68%, specificity 90.16%). A lower accuracy of the diagnostic panel and the necessity to use more markers in the case of recurrence was connected with a different structure of patients. Conclusions: Multi-marker test can significantly improve the bladder cancer detection both during the primary diagnostics and monitoring of patients with NMIBC. This outcome should result in other, larger studies.

Introduction: To evaluate the prognostic value of T1 subclassification and fascin-1 expression in T1 human urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder. Materials and Methods: In a prospective study with 105 consecutive patients, T1 tumors were subclassified into 2 groups according to the depth of tumor invasion. The tunica muscularis mucosae was used as a landmark. The expression of fascin-1 was examined by using an anti-fascin-1 mouse monoclonal antibody and was evaluated semiquantitatively for both intensity and distribution. The patients were followed up for 27.3 ± 13.7 months. Results: The T1 tumor subclassification was feasible in 99 patients (94%). T1a tumor was detected in 77 patients (73%), T1b tumor in 22 patients (21%). An invasive tumor was found in 5 patients (4.8%) during the restaging transurethral resection of the bladder. The risk of understaging in patients with T1b tumor was 18%. There was not a significant difference in time to the recurrence in the T1a and the T1b group. The progression-free survival rates were significantly different between both groups (p = 0.0034). No correlation was found between fascin-1 positivity and the depth of tumor invasion. Fascin-1 positivity did not correlate with recurrence or the progression-free intervals. In the multivariate analysis, only the extent of lamina propria invasion was an independent predictor of the tumor progression. The fascin positivity was not an independent prognostic factor relating to the risk of recurrence or progression. Conclusion: The finding of T1b tumor was connected with a significantly higher risk of progression and understaging. The fascin-1 expression did not correlate with the depth of tumor invasion or with the tumor recurrence or progression.