BACKGROUND: As cancer survivorship increases, health care systems will be challenged to meet patient needs. With the limited availability of clinician time and resources, novel methods of using patient-reported outcomes may improve the quality and efficiency of follow-up care in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: The authors conducted a randomized trial in patients with TNM stage I to III breast cancer comparing standard care with SIS.NET (System for Individualized Survivorship Care, based on patient self-reported data, with review by Nurse practitioners, targeted Education, and Triage), a follow-up protocol including integration of online health questionnaires at 3-month intervals and the evaluation of self-reported symptoms monitored and addressed remotely by a nurse practitioner (NP). The primary endpoint was to quantify the time between symptom reporting and remote evaluation of symptoms. The secondary endpoint was to compare use of health care resources (breast cancer-related visits, total medical appointments, and laboratory and imaging studies) over an 18-month period. RESULTS: A total of 102 participants were enrolled; 2 patients were excluded due to cancer recurrence. In the SIS.NET arm, 74% of new or changed self-reported symptoms were reviewed by a NP in <3 days. SIS.NET patients reported more new or changed symptoms compared with standard care patients (7.36 vs 3.2; P 5.0045). During the 18-month trial, there were no statistically significant differences noted between the SIS.NET and standard care arms with regard to oncology-related appointments (mean, 4.2 vs 4.1 appointments), number of physician visits (mean, 10.8 vs 9.6 visits), or medical tests (mean, 5.5 vs 5 tests). CONCLUSIONS: Integration of online health questionnaires with remote review by a NP facilitated symptom reporting and may provide a means of convenient symptom assessment, but it did not appear to reduce health care resource use. Cancer 2015;121:893-9.

IntroductionThe Advancing Research and Treatment in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration and Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects longitudinal studies were designed to describe the natural history of familial‐frontotemporal lobar degeneration due to autosomal dominant mutations.MethodsWe examined cognitive performance, behavioral ratings, and brain volumes from the first time point in 320 MAPT, GRN, and C9orf72 family members, including 102 non–mutation carriers, 103 asymptomatic carriers, 43 mildly/questionably symptomatic carriers, and 72 carriers with dementia.ResultsAsymptomatic carriers showed similar scores on all clinical measures compared with noncarriers but reduced frontal and temporal volumes. Those with mild/questionable impairment showed decreased verbal recall, fluency, and Trail Making Test performance and impaired mood and self‐monitoring. Dementia was associated with impairment in all measures. All MAPT carriers with dementia showed temporal atrophy, but otherwise, there was no single cognitive test or brain region that was abnormal in all subjects.DiscussionImaging changes appear to precede clinical changes in familial‐frontotemporal lobar degeneration, but specific early clinical and imaging changes vary across individuals.

Our objective was to evaluate the association between cognitive-behavioral deficits and patient quality of life (QoL), caregiver burden, and disease stage in a population of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We administered the ALS Cognitive-Behavioral Screen™ to 86 patients with ALS. Multiple regression was used to evaluate the association between cognitive or behavioral deficits and disease stage, patient QoL, and caregiver burden while controlling for clinically important variables. Of 86 participants enrolled, 53 (62%) had some degree of cognitive impairment, 32 (37%) were behaviorally impaired and four met both cognitive and behavioral screening criteria for frontotemporal dementia (FTD). The severity of cognitive-behavioral deficits was not associated with patient QoL. More pronounced cognitive deficits (beta = -1.4, p = 0.04) and behavioral symptoms (-0.69, p < 0.001) predicted higher caregiver burden. Self-reported QoL was lower in patients with more depressive symptoms (beta = -0.32, p < 0.001) and more advanced disease (beta =0.10, p = 0.01). In conclusion, general QoL for patients with ALS is not associated with cognitive or behavioral deficits. More severe cognitive deficits and caregiver-reported behavioral symptoms predict higher caregiver burden. Routine cognitive-behavioral screening can identify patients who require full neuropsychological examination, inform patient counseling, and identify caregivers in need of early, targeted interventions.

Cognitive-behavioral change is a key aspect of disease heterogeneity in ALS. Executive function in ALS overall remains stable over 7 months as detected by an administered screening tool. However, patients may develop caregiver-reported behavioral symptoms in that time period. Screening for caregiver-reported symptoms has a particular utility in predicting future clinical decline, increased caregiver burden, and worsening patient QOL.