In cells, sequence-specific transcription factors must search through an entire genome to find their target sites in promoters. Such sites may be identified by using one-dimensional (linear diffusion) and/or three-dimensional (association/dissociation) mechanisms. We show here that wild-type p53 possesses the ability to linearly diffuse on DNA. p53 lacking its C terminus is incapable of such sliding along DNA, while the isolated C terminus of p53 is even more effective than the full-length protein at one-dimensional linear diffusion. Importantly, neither acetylation-mimicking mutations nor phosphorylation of residues within the C terminus stimulates linear diffusion by p53. Supporting these in vitro observations, we found that C-terminally deleted p53 (p53Delta30) expressed at physiological levels is deficient in binding to and transactivating downstream promoters in vivo. Therefore, our data show that the C terminus is a positive regulator of DNA binding in vivo and in vitro, and indicate that the mechanism may involve linear diffusion.

The Cdc25C phosphatase mediates cellular entry into mitosis. The cdc25C gene is a target for transcriptional downregulation by the tumor suppressor protein p53, and this repression can be shown to contribute to p53-dependent cell cycle arrest. Two independent mechanisms have been identified. One involves the direct binding of p53 to a site in the cdc25C promoter, and the second involves a CDE/CHR element. Both of these mediate p53-dependent repression at levels of p53 comparable to those produced by DNA damage. Three CCAAT elements in the cdc25C promoter that were previously implicated in p53-dependent repression fail to do so at physiologically relevant levels of p53. Repression of Cdc25C by p53 represents an additional mechanism for p53-dependent cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage. Importantly, this is a clear demonstration of p53-mediated transcriptional downregulation that is dependent on sequence-specific DNA binding by p53.

SUMMARY DNA binding by numerous transcription factors including the p53 tumor suppressor protein constitutes a vital early step in transcriptional activation. While the role of the central core DNA binding domain (DBD) of p53 in site-specific DNA binding has been established, the contribution of the sequence-independent C-terminal domain (CTD) is still not well understood. We investigated the DNA-binding properties of a series of p53 CTD variants using a combination of in vitro biochemical analyses and in vivo binding experiments. Our results provide several unanticipated and interconnected findings. First, the CTD enables DNA binding in a sequence-dependent manner that is drastically altered by either its modification or deletion. Second, dependence on the CTD correlates with the extent to which the p53 binding site deviates from the canonical consensus sequence. Finally, the CTD enables stable formation of p53-DNA complexes to divergent binding sites via DNA-induced conformational changes within the DBD itself.

The p53 tumor suppressor interacts with its negative regulator Mdm2 via the former’s N-terminal region and core domain. Yet the extreme p53 C-terminal region contains lysine residues ubiquitinated by Mdm2 and can bear post-translational modifications that inhibit Mdm2–p53 association. We show that, the Mdm2–p53 interaction is decreased upon deletion, mutation or acetylation of the p53 C-terminus. Mdm2 decreases the association of full-length but not C-terminally deleted p53 with a DNA target sequence in vitro and in cells. Further, using multiple approaches we demonstrate that a peptide from p53 C-terminus directly binds Mdm2 N-terminus in vitro. We also show that p300-acetylated p53 binds inefficiently to Mdm2 in vitro, and Nutlin-3 treatment induces C-terminal modification(s) of p53 in cells, explaining the low efficiency of Nutlin-3 in dissociating p53-MDM2 in vitro.

We have previously reported that when DNA replication is blocked in some human cell lines, p53 is impaired in its ability to induce a subset of its key target genes, including p21 WAF1/CIP1. Here, we investigated the reason for this impairment by comparing the effects of two agents, hydroxyurea (HU), which arrests cells in early S phase and impairs induction of p21, and daunorubicin, which causes a G 2 block and leads to robust activation of p21 by p53. HU treatment was shown to inhibit p21 mRNA transcription rather than alter its mRNA stability. Nevertheless, chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed that HU impacts neither p53 binding nor acetylation of histones H3 and H4 within the p21 promoter. Furthermore, recruitment of the TFIID/TATA-binding protein complex and the large subunit of RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II) are equivalent after HU and daunorubicin treatments. Relative to daunorubicin treatment, however, transcription elongation of the p21 gene is significantly impaired in cells treated with HU, as evidenced by reduced occupancy of RNA Pol II at regions downstream of the start site. Likewise, in the p21 downstream region after administration of HU, there is less of a specifically phosphorylated form of RNA Pol II (Pol II-C-terminal domain serine 2P) which occurs only when the polymerase is elongating RNA. We propose that while the DNA replication checkpoint is unlikely to regulate the assembly of a p21 promoter initiation complex, it signals to one or more factors involved in the process of transcriptional elongation.