Though substantial proportions of the public and practicing physicians report that they have had personal experience with medical errors, neither group has the sense of urgency expressed by many national organizations. To advance their agenda, national groups need to convince physicians, in particular, that the current proposals for reducing errors will be very effective.
We report the results of a national survey conducted to help public health offi cials understand the public's response to community mitigation interventions for a severe outbreak of pandemic infl uenza. Survey results suggest that if community mitigation measures are instituted, most respondents would comply with recommendations but would be challenged to do so if their income or job were severely compromised. The results also indicate that community mitigation measures could cause problems for persons with lower incomes and for racial and ethnic minorities. Twentyfour percent of respondents said that they would not have anyone available to take care of them if they became sick with pandemic infl uenza. Given these results, planning and public engagement will be needed to encourage the public to be prepared.
Our results suggest the need for public education about smallpox. These data also point to the importance of a discussion in the medical community about the advisability of vaccination of individual physicians at this time.
This 2006 survey of 4,157 randomly selected U.S. adults compared perceptions of health care disparities among fourteen racial and ethnic groups to those of whites. Findings suggest that many ethnic minority groups view their health care situations differently and, often, more negatively than whites. A substantial proportion perceived discrimination in receiving health care, and many felt that they would not receive the best care if they were sick. Most differences remained when socioeconomic characteristics were controlled for. The variety of responses across racial groups demonstrates the importance of examining ethnic subgroups separately rather than combined into a single category.
This 2007 Harvard School of Public Health/Robert Wood Johnson Foundation survey of 4,334 randomly selected U.S. adults compared perceptions of the quality of physician care among fourteen racial and ethnic groups with those of whites. On each measure examined, at least five and as many as eleven subgroups perceived their care to be significantly worse than care for whites. In many instances, subgroups were at least fifteen percentage points more negative than whites. This was true for Central/South Americans, Chinese Americans, and Korean Americans on five of seven measures. Many of the differences remained after socioeconomic characteristics and language skills were controlled for. [Health Affairs 27, no. 2 (2008): 507-517; 10.1377/hlthaff.27.2.507] I t h a s n ow b e e n f o u r y e a r s s i n c e the Institute of Medicine's (IOM's) report Unequal Treatment documented broad racial and ethnic disparities in U.S. health care, using a variety of outcome and process measures. 1 One of those measures, perceptions of health care quality, has become an important gauge of disparities, not only because such differences highlight service gaps, but also because perceptions of care have been linked to overall health outcomes. 2 Research has found that Hispanic, Asian, and African Americans, compared to whites, report lower quality in their overall interaction with their physicians, less time spent with their physicians, poorer patient-physician communication, diminished trust in their physicians, and less respect from their physicians. 3 P h y s i c i a n C a r e n The Harvard/RWJF survey. This paper reports the results from a 2007 Harvard School of Public Health/Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) national survey of fourteen minority ethnic subgroups' perceptions of the quality of their physician care. Our study fills a gap in the literature by providing current evidence for differences in perceived quality of physician care for each of these groups compared to whites. This multi-ethnic focus is important because, when discussing perceptions of health care quality, prior research has tended to look at the major ethnic groups (African Americans, Hispanic Americans, and Asian Americans) as homogenous groupings, even though group members are from different countries, cultures, and language backgrounds. Also, most prior studies have not examined the experiences of American Indians/Alaska Natives. There is reason to believe that members of these subgroups may have different health care experiences than other members of their ethnic groups. For example, Hispanic subgroups have been found to differ across multiple health outcomes, such as low birthweight, rates of premature birth, and mortality; African Americans of different backgrounds have been shown to have varying health outcomes; and Vietnamese Americans describe more health problems than other Asian Americans do, while Japanese Americans report fewer health problems than their fellow Asian Americans. 4 Given the heterogeneity within the larger ethnic gro...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.