No abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of sympathetic skin response (SSR) in evaluating autonomic involvement in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) while simultaneously showing the axonal loss by motor unit number estimation (MUNE). Bilateral SSR were recorded by suprasternal stimulus in 50 hands of 31 patients and compared with 50 hands of 25 healthy volunteers. The groups were examined for sympathetic symptoms and sympathetic symptom scores (SSS) were determined. Axon count was performed on the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle by using the MUNE method (with incremental technique) in both groups. There was no SSR difference between groups, although a significant difference was found for SSS. No relationships were found between SSR parameters and SSS or the electrophysiologic stage. MUNE of the APB muscle was significantly lower in CTS group and there was a negative correlation between MUNE and the electrophysiologic stage. The comparison of the MUNE and the amplitude of median compound muscle action potential indicated that MUNE is a highly sensitive method of determining severity in patients with CTS. In evaluating autonomic involvement in CTS, SSR does not seem to be a sensitive method. MUNE is a good indicator of motor reserve and can be helpful when following the treatment and prognosis of CTS in clinical practice.

ObjectiveImaging methods that use ionizing radiation have been more frequent in various medical fields with advances in imaging technology. The aim of our study was to make residents be aware of the radiation dose they are subjected to when they conduct radiological imaging methods, and of cancer risk.Materials and MethodsA total of 364 residents participated in this descriptive study which was conducted during the period between October, 2008 and January, 2009. The questionnaires were completed under strict control on a one-to-one basis from each department. A χ2-test was used for the evaluation of data obtained.ResultsOnly 7% of residents correctly answered to the question about the ionizing radiation dose of a posteroanterior (PA) chest X-ray. The question asking about the equivalent number of PA chest X-rays to the ionizing dose of a brain CT was answered correctly by 24% of residents; the same question regarding abdominal CT was answered correctly by 16% of residents, thorax CT by 16%, thyroid scintigraphy by 15%, intravenous pyelography by 9%, and lumbar spine radiography by 2%. The risk of developing a cancer throughout lifetime by a brain and abdominal CT were 33% and 28%, respectively.ConclusionRadiologic residents should have updated knowledge about radiation dose content and attendant cancer risks of various radiological imaging methods during both basic medical training period and following practice period.

Background and PurposeElectrodiagnostic studies can be used to confirm the diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathies, but more sensitive diagnostic methods are often needed to measure the ensuing motor neuronal loss and sympathetic failure.MethodsTwenty-six patients with lumbar radiculopathy and 30 controls were investigated using nerve conduction studies, motor unit number estimation (MUNE), testing of the sympathetic skin response (SSR), quantitative electromyography (QEMG), and magnetic resonance myelography (MRM).ResultsUsing QEMG as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of MUNE for the abductor hallucis longus muscle were 71.4% and 70%, respectively. While they were 75% and 68.8%, respectively, when used MRM as gold standard. The sensitivity and specificity of MUNE for the extensor digitorum brevis muscle were 100% and 84.1%, respectively, when the peroneal motor amplitude as the gold standard. The SSR latency was slightly longer in the patients than in the controls.ConclusionsMUNE is a simple and sensitive test for evaluating autonomic function and for diagnosing lumbosacral radiculopathy in patients. MUNE could be used routinely as a guide for the rehabilitation of patients with radiculopathies. SSR measurements may reveal subtle sympathetic abnormalities in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy.

No abstract