No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Sufficient nutrients are needed for critically ill patients to meet metabolic needs. Previous studies have shown that appropriate nutritional feeding during critical illness improves the success in weaning patients from mechanical ventilation and in reducing the length of hospitalization [1][2][3][4][5] Correspondence: Yi-Chia Huang, ych@csmu.edu.tw AF = appropriate feeding; APACHE = Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; ICU = intensive care unit; MAC = mid-arm circumference; MEE = measured energy expenditure; MI = Maastricht Index; NRI = Nutritional Risk Index; OF = overfeeding; RQ = respiratory quotient; TLC = total lymphocyte count; TSF = triceps skinfold thickness; UF = underfeeding; UUN = urine urea nitrogen. AbstractBackground There is very little information on what is considered an adequate energy intake for mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients. The purpose of the present study was to determine this energy requirement by making use of patients' nutritional status. Methods The study was conducted in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit of Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan. Patients were hemodynamically stable and not comatose, and were requiring at least 7 days of mechanical ventilation. Fifty-four patients successfully completed this study. The resting energy expenditure was measured using indirect calorimetry. The total energy requirement was considered 120% of the measured energy expenditure. The daily nutrient intake was recorded. Nutritional status was assessed using single and multiple parameters, nitrogen balance, and medical records, and was performed within 24 hours of admission and after 7 days in the intensive care unit. Results Fifteen patients were being underfed (< 90% of total energy requirement), 20 patients were in the appropriate feeding (AF) group (within ± 10% of total energy requirement), and 19 patients received overfeeding (> 110% of total energy requirement). Patients in the underfeeding group received only 68.3% of their energy requirement, while the overfeeding group patients received up to 136.5% of their required calories. Only patients in the AF group had a positive nitrogen balance (0.04 ± 5.1) on day 7. AF group patients had a significantly higher Nutritional Risk Index value at day 7 than at day 1. Conclusion AF patients had more improvement in nutritional status than patients in the other feeding groups. To provide at least 120% of the resting energy expenditure seemed adequate to meet the caloric energy needs of hemodynamically stable, mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients.