Objective: To evaluate the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and diabetes outcomes in German children and adolescents.Methods: A total of 1829 subjects <18 years old with type 1 diabetes mellitus from 13 German diabetes centers were included from June 2013 until June 2014. Data were collected within the multicenter DPV (Diabetes Prospective Follow-up) registry. SES was measured with a composite index. Multivariable regression models were applied to analyze the association of SES and outcomes adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration, and migration status.Results: Low SES was significantly associated with worse diabetes outcomes: higher hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) (64.3 mmol/mol), lower proportion of insulin pump therapy (43.6%), fewer daily self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) measurements (5.7), more inpatient days per patient-year (5.8) compared to patients with medium/high SES (HbA1c: 61.3 mmol/mol, P < 0.001/59.8 mmol/mol, P < 0.0001; proportion of pump therapy: 54.5%, P < 0.01/ 54.9%, P < 0.01; SMBG: 6.0, P < 0.01/ 6.1, P < 0.01; inpatient days: 4.5, P < 0.0001/3.4, P < 0.0001). The inclusion of migration status in the models resulted in only minor changes in the outcomes. Conclusion: Despite free health care, low SES is associated with unfavorable diabetes outcomes in Germany. The poorer diabetes outcomes of children with diabetes have been attributed to their migration status and may be partly explained by low SES. Both factors must become part of targeted diabetes care in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. K E Y W O R D S access to care, migration background, outcome, risk factors, socio-economic-status Kirsten Mönkemöller and Esther Müller-Godeffroy shared first authorship.
To investigate natural course, treatment, and outcomes in familial versus sporadic type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSIn a population-based study, we compared patients with onset of type 1 diabetes before the age of 20 years who had a first-degree relative with type 1 diabetes (familial diabetes) with patients with type 1 diabetes who had no first-degree relative with type 1 diabetes (sporadic diabetes) at diagnosis and over the first 10 treatment years, using multivariable regression and proportional hazards models. Patients were identified from the Diabetes Prospective Follow-up Registry (DPV) between 1995 and 2018. RESULTSOf 57,371 patients with type 1 diabetes, 53,606 (93.4%) had sporadic diabetes and 3,765 (6.6%) had familial diabetes. Familial diabetes, compared with sporadic diabetes, was associated with younger age (median 7.9 vs. 9.7 years, P < 0.001), lower prevalence of ketoacidosis (11.9% vs. 20.4%, P < 0.001), and lower HbA 1c levels (9.7% vs. 11.1%, P < 0.001) at onset and higher prevalence of associated autoimmune disease (16.7% vs. 13.6%, P < 0.001). Over 10 years, patients with familial diabetes, in comparison with sporadic diabetes, more often used insulin pumps (P < 0.001) and had a lower rate of severe hypoglycemia (12.97 vs. 14.44 per 100 patient-years, P < 0.001) but similar HbA 1c levels (P ‡ 0.08) and ketoacidosis rates (1.85 vs. 2.06 per 100 patient-years, P = 0.11). In familial and sporadic diabetes, absence of ketoacidosis at onset predicted fewer events of severe hypoglycemia (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67, P < 0.001, and 0.91, P < 0.001, respectively) and of ketoacidosis (HR 0.64, P 5 0.007, and 0.66, P < 0.001, respectively) after 10 years. CONCLUSIONSFamilial type 1 diabetes, compared with sporadic type 1 diabetes, is characterized by earlier disease manifestation and higher autoimmune comorbidity as well as less metabolic decompensation at onset, likely related to higher disease awareness in affected families, while the course of disease is similar. These findings may have implications for the generalizability of results of diabetes prevention trials from patients with familial type 1 diabetes to patients with sporadic type 1 diabetes.The prevalence of familial type 1 diabetes varies, with estimates ranging from 5% (1) to 12.2% (2) depending on the population investigated, the length of observation,
Background: Wolcott-Rallison syndrome (WRS) is characterized by permanent early-onset diabetes, skeletal dysplasia and several additional features, e.g. recurrent liver failure. This is the first multicentre approach that focuses on diabetes management in WRS. We searched the German/Austrian Diabetes-Patienten-Verlaufsdokumentation (DPV) registry and studied anthropometric characteristics, diabetes treatment, glycaemic control and occurrence of severe hypoglycaemia (SH) and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in 11 patients with WRS. Furthermore, all local treatment centres were personally contacted to retrieve additional information on genetic characteristics, migration background and rate of consanguinity. Results: Data were analysed at diabetes onset and after a median follow-up period of 3 (1.5-9.0) years (time from diagnosis to latest follow-up). Median age at diabetes onset was 0.2 (0.1-0.3) years, while onset was delayed in one patient (aged 16 months). Seventy percent of patients manifested with DKA. At follow-up, 90% of patients were on insulin pump therapy requiring 0.7 [0.5-1.0] IU of insulin/kg/d. More than two third of patients had HbA1c level ≥ 8%, 40% experienced at least one episode of SH in the course of the disease. Three patients died at 0.6, 5 and 9 years of age, respectively. To the best of our knowledge three patients carried novel mutations in EIF2AK3. Conclusion: Insulin requirements of individuals with WRS registered in DPV appear to be comparable to those of preschool children with well-controlled type 1 diabetes, while glycaemic control tends to be worse and episodes of SH tend to be more common. The majority of individuals with WRS in the DPV registry does not reach glycaemic target for HbA1c as defined for preschool children (< 7.5%). International multicentre studies are required to further improve our knowledge on the care of children with WRS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.