These findings suggest that adjustment of treatment based on the time of the onset of symptoms may be warranted for the patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Angiogenesis inhibitors, such as sorafenib and axitinib, which target vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling, are widely used for renal cell carcinoma, including metastasis. In this study, we report a case of cardiovascular adverse events of aortic dissection and cardiac dysfunction during treatment with sorafenib and axitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. A 66-year-old man had been administered sorafenib for 2 years after nephrectomy due to renal cell carcinoma. To control the progression of metastatic lung tumor, axitinib was started after sorafenib for four years. During the treatment, angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers and Ca antagonists were used to strictly control the axitinib-induced hypertension and proteinuria. Aortic dissection and cardiac dysfunction occurred coincidentally. Considering the critical role of VEGF signaling in the homeostasis of the cardiovascular system, we speculated that the long-term use of axitinib and sorafenib directly influenced the initiation of aortic dissection and cardiac dysfunction. Although the precise mechanisms underlying the aortic dissection and cardiac dysfunction induced by angiogenesis inhibition are still elusive, onco-cardiologists and oncologists should pay careful attention to cardiovascular toxicity and complications in patients with cancer, particularly patients undergoing long-term cancer treatment.

No abstract

Aim: Although current guidelines recommend surgical revascularization as the first-line therapy for chronic total occlusion of the abdominal aorta (Leriche syndrome), endovascular therapy (EVT) has been increasingly utilized because of the development of new technologies and techniques. EVT has demonstrated durable midterm outcomes for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Nonetheless, little is known regarding their long-term outcomes and predictors of restenosis.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a multicenter database of 64 consecutive patients (age, 73 ± 10 years; 64% male; 22% critical limb ischemia) undergoing EVT for aortoiliac occlusive disease between September 2005 and March 2016. The outcome measures were primary and secondary patency, following EVT, calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Independent predictors associated with restenosis were assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression model.Results: Technical success was achieved in 61 patients (95%). In total, 214 stents (192 self-expandable stents, 22 balloon-expandable stents) were implanted. During the follow-up of 33 ± 28 months, 11 patients experienced loss of patency. The primary patency rates were 88%, 70%, and 70% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The secondary patency rates were 98%, 87%, and 77% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. In Cox regression analysis, E-Luminexx stent use (in 29 patients, 48%) was associated with restenosis [hazard ratio, 4.41, P = 0.038].Conclusion: In this retrospective study, EVT for AIOD demonstrated favorable 5-year patency. E-Luminexx stent implantation was associated with restenosis in this population.