The interest in rotational atherectomy (RA) has increased over the past decade as a consequence of more complex and calcified coronary stenoses being attempted with percutaneous coronary interventions. Yet adoption of RA is hampered by several factors: amongst others, by the lack of a standardised protocol. This European expert consensus document stems from the awareness of the large heterogeneity in the protocols adopted to perform rotational atherectomy. The objective of the present document is to provide some points of consensus among highly experienced operators on the most controversial steps of RA in an attempt to build the basis of a standardised and universally accepted protocol.
Background:
The study focuses on the evolution of practice, procedural outcomes, and in-hospital complications of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention in Europe.
Methods and Results:
Data from 17 626 procedures enrolled in European Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion between January 2008 and June 2015 were assessed. The mean patient age was 63.9±10.9 years; 85% were men. Procedural success increased from 79.7% to 89.3% through the study period. Patients enrolled during the years had increasing comorbidities and lesion complexity (J-CTO score [Multicenter CTO Registry of Japan] increased from 1.76±1.03 in 2008 to 2.17±0.91 in 2015;
P
for trend, <0.001). Retrograde approach utilization steadily increased from 10.1% in 2008 to 29.9% in 2015 (
P
for trend, <0.001). Antegrade dissection reentry adoption was low, not exceeding 5.5%. In-hospital mortality decreased during the study period from 0.4% to 0.1% (
P
for trend, <0.001), whereas in-hospital complication rates remained essentially unchanged, in the range 4.4% to 5.2% (
P
for trend, 0.390).
Conclusions:
Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention has shown a steady increase in procedural success rate over time, with unchanged complication rates, despite the increasing complexity of the lesions attempted. The J-CTO score predictive value for procedural success was low for the entire registry and had no predictive ability for the retrograde approach.
The frequency, predisposing factors and course of agranulocytosis (granulocytes < 250/microliter) secondary to antithyroid drugs were studied in a cohort of 1256 continuously treated outpatients with hyperthyroidism during the 15 year period from 1973 to 1987. Two cases of agranulocytosis were detected; the frequency was 0.18% (95%-confidence intervals, 0.0-0.44%). This prevalence appears to be lower than reported in previous studies (up to 1.8%). For other adverse drug reactions, there was a clear-cut relationship to initial thionamide dose and to the body mass index; most reactions occurred during the first weeks of treatment. In addition, eight patients referred for thionamide drug- induced agranulocytosis were studied, and the following results obtained: Methimazole dose in patients with agranulocytosis was almost twice as in other patients (63.3 +/- 19.7 vs 34.3 +/- 29.7 mg daily) suggesting that this complication was related to dose. The interval between start of antithyroid drug treatment and first symptoms of agranulocytosis was 33 days (median; range, 23-55 days); hence, prolonged treatment beyond this period would appear relatively safe. Withdrawal of the causative agent and treatment of infection led to recovery of leukocyte counts within 15 days (median; range, 5-31 days). Two fatal outcomes were seen in referred patients. In one severely hyperthyroid patient with methimazole-induced agranulocytosis, recombinant human granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor induced clinical and hematologic recovery within a few days of administration. In conclusion, agranulocytosis is the most severe side effect of antithyroid drugs. According to our results and a literature review, it occurs almost exclusively during the first ten weeks of treatment and is probably related to the drug dose.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
The number of retrograde procedures in Europe has increased, with high percents of success, low rates of major complications, and good long-term outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.