BackgroundAchieving adequate control of postsurgical pain remains a challenge in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) infiltration has been shown to provide postsurgical analgesia following lower abdominal surgery. We assessed the safety and efficacy of a prolonged-release liposomal formulation of the local anesthetic bupivacaine administered via infiltration into the TAP in a cohort of patients undergoing open abdominal umbilical hernia repair.MethodsPatients included in the study were 18–75 years of age, had American Society of Anesthesiologists physical classification status 1–3, and underwent open abdominal umbilical hernia repair with ultrasound-guided TAP infiltration immediately after surgery using an equal-volume bilateral infusion of liposomal bupivacaine 266 mg (diluted to 30 mL in normal saline). Outcome measures included patient-reported pain intensity (11-point numeric rating scale), satisfaction with postsurgical analgesia (5-point Likert scale), incidence of opioid-related adverse events, and time to first use of supplemental rescue analgesia.ResultsThirteen patients underwent surgery and received bilateral TAP infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine; TAP infiltration failed in the first patient. Mean numeric rating scale pain scores were 0.6 immediately before TAP infiltration and remained ≤2.3 through 120 hours after infiltration; mean scores at 120 hours and 10 days were 0.9 and 0.4, respectively. Ten patients (77%) required supplemental analgesia; median time to first use was 11 hours. At discharge and day 10, 54% and 62% of patients, respectively, were “extremely satisfied” with postsurgical analgesia (Likert score 5). There were no opioid-related or other adverse events.ConclusionAlthough the current study was limited by both its lack of a control group and its small size, to our knowledge, it is the first published report on use of liposomal bupivacaine for TAP infiltration. In this cohort, liposomal bupivacaine was observed to be well tolerated with encouraging analgesic efficacy.
Background: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) is a new minimally-invasive surgical procedure in which a bioprosthetic aortic valve is placed via a small skin incision in the groin, over either the left or right iliac artery. TAVR was recently approved by the FDA as a treatment option for aortic stenosis in patients who may be too frail to undergo open heart surgery. Anesthetic management of TAVR is complicated by the fact that rapid left ventricular pacing (to at least 180 beats per minute) is required at multiple points throughout the procedure. Aim: This rapid pacing creates a profound pathophysiologic stress on the heart, sometimes leading to severe left ventricular dysfunction and resultant complete hemodynamic collapse. We report that the use of prophylactic infusion of epinephrine and/or norepinephrine in patients undergoing TAVR results in improved recovery from rapid pacing as reflected by intraoperative trends in systolic systemic blood pressure and systolic pulmonary arterial pressure. Cases: Here we report three cases. During the first of these, we reacted to intraoperative hemodynamic changes by administering boluses of vasoactive medications as needed. During the other two cases, we preemptively infused vasopressors to facilitate a more rapid recovery from some of the hemodynamic disturbance associated with either TAVR or rapid pacing. Conclusion: The two patients in this series who were managed with a preemptive strategy had higher ratios of systemic systolic blood pressure to pulmonary arterial systolic blood pressure at the end of the case than did the patient who was managed reactively. This suggests that the preemptive strategy may lead to decreased left ventricular impairment and improved overall cardiac function after TAVR. W. Bethune et al.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.