The current paper analyses the micro and mesozooplankton in Ushuaia and Golondrina Bays, the first research on these plankton fractions of these areas in wintertime (August 2004). The number of microzooplankton and mesozooplankton taxa was higher in Ushuaia Bay than in Golondrina Bay. Aloricate ciliates predominated over tintinnids in microzooplankton and holoplankton over meroplankton in mesozooplankton in both bays. Ctenocalanus citer, Drepanopus forcipatus and Clausocalanus brevipes presented the highest frequency of occurrence. Among the meroplankton, Halicarcinus planatus and Munida gregaria were the most frequent decapod larvae in both bays. The distribution of the different sampling station groups of microzooplankton and mesozooplankton as determined by cluster analysis suggests the influence of natural conditions in each bay and anthropogenic environmental differences between the two bays. RESUMOEste trabalho analisa o micro e o mesozooplâncton das Baías Ushuaia e Golondrina, constituindo a primeira pesquisa realizada nessas áreas sobre estas frações do plâncton no inverno (agosto 2004). O número dos taxa do microzooplâncton e do mesozooplâncton foi mais elevado na Baía Ushuaia do que na Baía Golondrina. Os ciliados aloricados foram dominantes sobre os tintinídeos, enquanto que no mesozooplâncton o holoplâncton foi dominante nas duas baías. Ctenocalamus citer, Drepanopus forcipatus e Clausocalamus brevipes foram as espécies mais freqüentes. No meroplâncton, Halicarnus planatus e Munida gregaria foram as larvas de decápodes mais freqüentes em ambos os locais. Os diferentes grupos de estações formados em função do microzooplâncton e do mesozooplânkton, e detectados na análise de agrupamento, sugerem a influência de condições naturais em cada baía e de diferenças ambientais antropogénicas entre as duas baías.Descriptors: Microzooplankton,

Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be selfarchived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com".

Since ciliates rarely possess structures that easily fossilize, we are limited in our ability to use paleontological studies to reconstruct the early evolution of this large and ecologically important clade of protists. Tintinnids, a group of loricate (house-forming) planktonic ciliates, are the only group that has a significant fossil record. Putative tintinnid fossils from rocks older than Jurassic, however, possess few to no characters that can be found in extant ciliates; these fossils are best described as 'incertae sedis eukaryotes'. Here, we review the Devonian fossil Nassacysta reticulata and propose that it is likewise another incertae sedis eukaryote due to the lack of any unambiguous ciliate characters. Future tintinnid fossil descriptions would be most helpful if: (i) neutral terminology is used in the descriptions but ciliate-specific terminology in the interpretations; (ii) the current ciliate classification is used, although fossil data may expand or modify classifications based on modern forms; (iii) close collaboration with specialists studying extant ciliates is done; and (iv) editors include an expert of extant ciliates in the review process.