Background. Treatment of splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) patients is not standardized. Recent data suggest that rituximab is highly effective and could be considered as initial therapy. Aim. To assess the efficacy of rituximab monotherapy in a large series of patients with SMZL and compare these results with splenectomy results. Methods. The studied population included 85 patients. Fiftyeight received rituximab at a dose of 375 mg/m 2 per week for 6 weeks as induction followed by maintenance at the same dose every 2 months for 1-2 years, whereas 27 patients were treated using splenectomy only. Results. The overall response rate to rituximab 2 months after the end of induction was 95% (complete response [CR], 45%; unconfirmed CR, 26%; partial response, 24%). The median times to hematologic and clinical response were 2 weeks and 3 weeks, respectively. Forty-three of 55 patients already completed the maintenance phase: 28 sustained their initial response, 14 improved their response, and one progressed. Eighty-five percent of splenectomized patients responded, and two were treated with rituximab as consolidation after splenectomy and achieved a CR. The 5-year overall and progression-free survival (PFS) rates for rituximab-treated and splenectomized patients were 92% and 77% (p ϭ .09) and 73% and 58% (p ϭ .06), respectively. Furthermore, maintenance therapy with rituximab resulted in a longer duration of response (at 5 years, PFS was 84% for patients receiving maintenance and 36% for patients without maintenance, p Ͻ.0001). Conclusions. Rituximab is a very effective and well-tolerated therapy and may be substituted for splenectomy as the firstline treatment of choice for patients with SMZL. TheOncologist 2013;18:190 -197 Implications for Practice: Treatment in splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is not standardized. Splenectomy has been considered as the treatment of choice in symptomatic patients. However, this can only result in a partial response. Furthermore, splenectomy is a major surgical procedure with significant morbidity, especially in elderly patients. Recent data, in a relatively small series of patients, suggests that the monoclonal antibody anti-CD20, rituximab, is highly effective with minimal toxicity. In this study, we compare these two treatment modalities in a large number of patients with long follow up. Our data shows that rituximab is associated with better quality of response as almost half of the patients achieved CR in contrast to splenectomized patients, along with better five-year PFS and OS. Furthermore, we stress the importance of maintenance therapy, since it can clearly improve the duration of remission. Based on these findings, we suggest that rituximab should be the treatment of choice in SMZL. INTRODUCTIONSplenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is a rare form of indolent B-cell lymphoma, accounting for Ͻ2% of all lymphoid malignancies [1,2]. It mainly affects elderly or middle-aged patients, with a median age of ϳ65 years. SMZL is characterized by splenomegaly withou...

No abstract

This retrospective study aimed to describe the Hellenic experience on the use of brentuximab vedotin (BV) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) given within its indication. From June 2011 to April 2015, ninety‐five patients with R/R HL, who received BV in 20 centers from Greece, were analyzed. Their median age was 33 years, and 62% were males. Sixty‐seven patients received BV after autologous stem cell transplantation failure, whereas 28 patients were treated with BV without a prior autologous stem cell transplantation, due to advanced age/comorbidities or chemorefractory disease. The median number of prior treatments was 4 and 44% of the patients were refractory to their most recent therapy. The median number of BV cycles was 8 (range, 2‐16), and the median time to best response was the fourth cycle. Fifty‐seven patients achieved an objective response: twenty‐two (23%), a complete response (CR), and 35 patients (37%), a partial, for an overall response rate of 60%. Twelve patients (13%) had stable disease, and the remaining twenty‐six (27%) had progressive disease as their best response. At a median follow‐up of 11.5 months, median progression‐free survival and overall survival were 8 and 26.5 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that chemosensitivity to treatment administered before BV was associated with a significantly increased probability of achieving response to BV (P = .005). Bulky disease (P = .01) and response to BV (P <.001) were significant for progression‐free survival, while refractoriness to most recent treatment (P = .04), bulky disease (P = .005), and B‐symptoms (P = .001) were unfavorable factors for overall survival. Among the 22 CRs, 5 remain in CR with no further treatment after BV at a median follow‐up of 13 months. In conclusion, our data indicate that BV is an effective treatment for R/R HL patients even outside clinical trials. Whether BV can cure a fraction of patients remains to be seen.

A number of studies have looked into the pathophysiological role of angiogenesis in CLL, but the results have often been inconsistent. We aimed to gain direct insight into the angiogenic process in lymph nodes involved by CLL, focusing on proangiogenic cytokines and microvessel morphometry. The tissue levels of VEGF, Th-2 cytokines IL-6 and IL-8, IL-8 receptor CXCR2, and tyrosine p-STAT-3/SOCS-3 axis modulating cytokine expression were evaluated immunohistochemically in 62 CLL/SLL cases. Microvascular characteristics were evaluated by image analysis. Results were analyzed with regard to clinicopathological characteristics. Proliferation centers (PCs) were less well vascularised compared to non-PC areas. IL-8 and CXCR2 expression was distinctly uncommon as opposed to IL-6, VEGF and SOCS-3, which were detected in the vast majority of cases. The latter two molecule expressions were more pronounced in the PCs in ∼40% of the cases. p-STAT-3 immunoreactivity was recorded in 66.67% of the cases with a predilection for PCs. Microvessel morphometry was unrelated to proangiogenic cytokines, p-STAT-3, SOCS-3, or survival. Microvascular caliber and VEGF expression were higher in Binet stage A, whereasIL-6 expression was higher in stage C. VEGF and p-STAT-3 exerted a favorable effect on progression, which remained significant in multivariate analysis, thereby constituting potential outcome predictors in CLL patients.

No abstract