Despite clear technical superiority of genome sequencing (GS) over other diagnostic methods such as exome sequencing (ES), few studies are available regarding the advantages of its clinical application. We analyzed 1007 consecutive index cases for whom GS was performed in a diagnostic setting over a 2-year period. We reported pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants that explain the patients' phenotype in 212 of the 1007 cases (21.1%). In 245 additional cases (24.3%), a variant of unknown significance (VUS) related to the phenotype was reported. We especially investigated patients which had had ES with no genetic diagnosis (n = 358). For this group, GS diagnostic yield was 14.5% (52 patients with P/LP out of 358). GS should be especially indicated for ES-negative cases since up to 29.6% of them could benefit from GS testing (14.5% with P/LP, n = 52 and 15.1% with VUS, n = 54). Genetic diagnoses in most of the ES-negative/GS-positive cases were determined by technical superiority of GS, i.e., access to noncoding regions and more uniform coverage. Importantly, we reported 79 noncoding variants, of which, 41 variants were classified as P/LP. Interpretation of noncoding variants remains challenging, and in many cases, complementary methods based on direct enzyme assessment, biomarker testing and RNA analysis are needed for variant classification and diagnosis. We present the largest cohort of patients with GS performed in a clinical setting to date. The results of this study should direct the decision for GS as standard second-line, or even first-line stand-alone test.

Purpose Within this study, we aimed to discover novel gene–disease associations in patients with no genetic diagnosis after exome/genome sequencing (ES/GS). Methods We followed two approaches: (1) a patient-centered approach, which after routine diagnostic analysis systematically interrogates variants in genes not yet associated to human diseases; and (2) a gene variant centered approach. For the latter, we focused on de novo variants in patients that presented with neurodevelopmental delay (NDD) and/or intellectual disability (ID), which are the most common reasons for genetic testing referrals. Gene–disease association was assessed using our data repository that combines ES/GS data and Human Phenotype Ontology terms from over 33,000 patients. Results We propose six novel gene–disease associations based on 38 patients with variants in the BLOC1S1, IPO8, MMP15, PLK1, RAP1GDS1, and ZNF699 genes. Furthermore, our results support causality of 31 additional candidate genes that had little published evidence and no registered OMIM phenotype (56 patients). The phenotypes included syndromic/nonsyndromic NDD/ID, oral–facial–digital syndrome, cardiomyopathies, malformation syndrome, short stature, skeletal dysplasia, and ciliary dyskinesia. Conclusion Our results demonstrate the value of data repositories which combine clinical and genetic data for discovering and confirming gene–disease associations. Genetic laboratories should be encouraged to pursue such analyses for the benefit of undiagnosed patients and their families.

Proteins anchored to the cell surface via glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) play various key roles in the human body, particularly in development and neurogenesis. As such, many developmental disorders are caused by mutations in genes involved in the GPI biosynthesis and remodeling pathway. We describe ten unrelated families with bi-allelic mutations in PIGB, a gene that encodes phosphatidylinositol glycan class B, which transfers the third mannose to the GPI. Ten different PIGB variants were found in these individuals. Flow cytometric analysis of blood cells and fibroblasts from the affected individuals showed decreased cell surface presence of GPI-anchored proteins. Most of the affected individuals have global developmental and/or intellectual delay, all had seizures, two had polymicrogyria, and four had a peripheral neuropathy. Eight children passed away before four years old. Two of them had a clinical diagnosis of DOORS syndrome (deafness, onychodystrophy, osteodystrophy, mental retardation, and seizures), a condition that includes sensorineural deafness, shortened terminal phalanges with small finger and toenails, intellectual disability, and seizures; this condition overlaps with the severe phenotypes associated with inherited GPI deficiency. Most individuals tested showed elevated alkaline phosphatase, which is a characteristic of the inherited GPI deficiency but not DOORS syndrome. It is notable that two severely affected individuals showed 2-oxoglutaric aciduria, which can be seen in DOORS syndrome, suggesting that severe cases of inherited GPI deficiency and DOORS syndrome might share some molecular pathway disruptions.

We implemented a collaborative diagnostic program in Lahore (Pakistan) aiming to establish the genetic diagnosis, and to asses diagnostic yield and clinical impact in patients with suspected genetic diseases. Local physicians ascertained pediatric patients who had no previous access to genetic testing. More than 1586 genetic tests were performed in 1019 individuals (349 index cases, 670 relatives). Most frequently performed tests were exome/genome sequencing (ES/GS, 284/78 index cases) and specific gene panels (55 index cases). In 61.3% of the patients (n = 214) a genetic diagnosis was established based on pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants. Diagnostic yield was higher in consanguineous families (60.1 vs. 39.5%). In 27 patients, genetic diagnosis relied on additional biochemical testing, allowing rapid assessment of the functional effect of the variants. Remarkably, the genetic diagnosis had a direct impact on clinical management. Most relevant consequences were therapy related such as initiation of the appropriated treatment in a timely manner in 51.9% of the patients (n = 111). Finally, we report 12 candidate genes among 66 cases with no genetic diagnosis. Importantly, three of these genes were validated as ‘diagnostic’ genes given the strong evidence supporting causality derived from our data repository (CAP2-dilated cardiomyopathy, ITFG2-intellectual disability and USP53-liver cholestasis). The high diagnostic yield, clinical impact, and research findings demonstrate the utility of genomic testing, especially when used as first-line genetic test. For patients with suspected genetic diseases from resource-limited regions, ES can be considered as the test of choice to achieve genetic diagnosis.

BackgroundCongenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) are one of the most common malformations identified in the fetal stage. Bilateral renal agenesis (BRA) represents the most severe and fatal form of CAKUT. Only three genes have been confirmed to have a causal role in humans (ITGA8, GREB1L, and FGF20).MethodsGenome sequencing within a diagnostic setting and combined data repository analysis identified a novel gene.ResultsTwo patients presented with BRA, detected during the prenatal period, without additional recognizable malformations. They had parental consanguinity and similarly affected, deceased siblings, suggesting autosomal recessive inheritance. Evaluation of homozygous regions in patient 1 identified a novel, nonsense variant in GFRA1 (NM_001348097.1:c.676C>T, p.[Arg226*]). We identified 184 patients in our repository with renal agenesis and analyzed their exome/genome data. Of these 184 samples, 36 were from patients who presented with isolated renal agenesis. Two of them had loss-of-function variants in GFRA1. The second patient was homozygous for a frameshift variant (NM_001348097.1:c.1294delA, p.[Thr432Profs*13]). The GFRA1 gene encodes a receptor on the Wolffian duct that regulates ureteric bud outgrowth in the development of a functional renal system, and has a putative role in the pathogenesis of Hirschsprung disease.ConclusionsThese findings strongly support the causal role of GFRA1-inactivating variants for an autosomal recessive, nonsyndromic form of BRA. This knowledge will enable early genetic diagnosis and better genetic counseling for families with BRA.