Induction of broadly cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies is a high priority for AIDS vaccine development but one that has proven difficult to be achieved. While most immunogens generate antibodies that neutralize a subset of T-cell-line-adapted strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), none so far have generated a potent, broadly cross-reactive response against primary isolates of the virus. Even small increments in immunogen improvement leading to increases in neutralizing antibody titers and cross-neutralizing activity would accelerate vaccine development; however, a lack of uniformity in target strains used by different investigators to assess cross-neutralization has made the comparison of vaccine-induced antibody responses difficult. Thus, there is an urgent need to establish standard panels of HIV-1 reference strains for wide distribution. To facilitate this, full-length gp160 genes were cloned from acute and early subtype B infections and characterized for use as reference reagents to assess neutralizing antibodies against clade B HIV-1. Individual gp160 clones were screened for infectivity as Env-pseudotyped viruses in a luciferase reporter gene assay in JC53-BL (TZM-bl) cells. Functional env clones were sequenced and their neutralization phenotypes characterized by using soluble CD4, monoclonal antibodies, and serum samples from infected individuals and noninfected recipients of a recombinant gp120 vaccine. Env clones from 12 R5 primary HIV-1 isolates were selected that were not unusually sensitive or resistant to neutralization and comprised a wide spectrum of genetic, antigenic, and geographic diversity. These reference reagents will facilitate proficiency testing and other validation efforts aimed at improving assay performance across laboratories and can be used for standardized assessments of vaccine-elicited neutralizing antibodies.The development of an effective human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine is believed to require the induction of both virus-specific CD8 ϩ T cells and neutralizing antibodies (Abs) (56, 63). Neutralizing Abs are of particular interest because their presence at the time of intravenous, vaginal, and oral routes of live virus challenge has been shown to prevent AIDS virus infection in nonhuman primates (31,65,66,69,84,105). Due to the extraordinary degree of genetic diversity of HIV-1 and the structural complexity of its envelope glycoproteins (Env) (54, 118), designing an effective vaccine is difficult. These same properties of the virus also make it difficult to assess vaccine-elicited neutralizing Abs in a way that is meaningful and informative. Many candidate vaccines have included Env for the purpose of generating an effective neutralizing Ab response, but to date, none appear to elicit a response with the desired specificity and cross-reactivity (5,6,13,68). This poor immunogenicity is incompletely understood but might be explained by either the particular design or low valency of prototype immunogens (14).A number of new candidate immunog...

Preclinical studies of viral vector-based HIV-1 vaccine candidates have previously shown partial protection against stringent virus challenges in rhesus monkeys. In this study, we evaluated the protective efficacy of adenovirus serotype 26 (Ad26) vector priming followed by boosting with a purified envelope (Env) glycoprotein. Rhesus monkeys primed with Ad26 vectors expressing SIVsmE543 Env/Gag/Pol antigens and boosted with AS01B-adjuvanted SIVmac32H Env gp140 demonstrated complete protection in 50% of vaccinated animals against a series of repetitive, heterologous, intrarectal SIVmac251 challenges that infected all controls. Protective efficacy correlated with the functionality of Env-specific antibody responses. Comparable protection was also observed with a similar Ad/Env vaccine against repetitive, heterologous, intrarectal SHIV-SF162P3 challenges. These data demonstrate robust protection by Ad/Env vaccines against acquisition of stringent virus challenges in rhesus monkeys.

BACKGROUND A safe, effective vaccine is essential to end HIV. A canarypox/protein HIV vaccine regimen showed modest efficacy at reducing infection in Thailand. An analogous regimen using HIV-1 subtype C virus demonstrated potent humoral and cellular responses in a Phase 1/2a trial and triggered a Phase 2b/3 double-blinded trial to assess the safety and efficacy of this regimen in South Africa. METHODS We enrolled and randomized 5,404 healthy, HIV-uninfected 18-35-year olds at 14 sites to vaccine (2,704 participants) or placebo (2,700 participants) between 26 October 2016 and 21 June 2019. The vaccine regimen consisted of two ALVAC-HIV (vCP2438) (expressing HIV-1 subtype C env, clade B gp41 , gag and pro) immunizations at months 0 and 1, with booster immunizations of ALVAC-HIV plus bivalent subtype C gp120 protein/MF59 adjuvant at months 3, 6, 12 and 18. Efficacy was evaluated by HIV testing every 3 months. RESULTS In January 2020, pre-specified non-efficacy criteria were met at an interim analysis; further vaccinations were subsequently halted. The vaccines were safe and well-tolerated in the study population (median age 24, 70% female-sex-at-birth). Over the primary 24-month follow-up, there were 133 infections among placebo recipients and 138 among vaccinees (hazard ratio = 1.02; 95%CI, 0.81-1.30; P=0.84). Pre-specified subgroup analyses demonstrated no difference in efficacy by sex or when restricting to follow-up post-4 th vaccination, and no difference amongst female-sex-at-birth by age, BMI, prevalent STIs, behavioral risk score or region. CONCLUSIONS The ALVAC/gp120 regimen did not prevent HIV infection in South Africans despite prior evidence of immunogenicity. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02968849)

Background Coronavirus-like particles (CoVLP) that are produced in plants and display the prefusion spike glycoprotein of the original strain of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are combined with an adjuvant (Adjuvant System 03 [AS03]) to form the candidate vaccine. Methods In this phase 3, multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 85 centers, we assigned adults (≥18 years of age) in a 1:1 ratio to receive two intramuscular injections of the CoVLP+AS03 vaccine or placebo 21 days apart. The primary objective of the trial was to determine the efficacy of the CoVLP+AS03 vaccine in preventing symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) beginning at least 7 days after the second injection, with the analysis performed after the detection of at least 160 cases. Results A total of 24,141 volunteers participated in the trial; the median age of the participants was 29 years. Covid-19 was confirmed by polymerase-chain-reaction assay in 165 participants in the intention-to-treat population; all viral samples that could be sequenced contained variants of the original strain. Vaccine efficacy was 69.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56.7 to 78.8) against any symptomatic Covid-19 caused by five variants that were identified by sequencing. In a post hoc analysis, vaccine efficacy was 78.8% (95% CI, 55.8 to 90.8) against moderate-to-severe disease and 74.0% (95% CI, 62.1 to 82.5) among the participants who were seronegative at baseline. No severe cases of Covid-19 occurred in the vaccine group, in which the median viral load for breakthrough cases was lower than that in the placebo group by a factor of more than 100. Solicited adverse events were mostly mild or moderate and transient and were more frequent in the vaccine group than in the placebo group; local adverse events occurred in 92.3% and 45.5% of participants, respectively, and systemic adverse events in 87.3% and 65.0%. The incidence of unsolicited adverse events was similar in the two groups up to 21 days after each dose (22.7% and 20.4%) and from day 43 through day 201 (4.2% and 4.0%). Conclusions The CoVLP+AS03 vaccine was effective in preventing Covid-19 caused by a spectrum of variants, with efficacy ranging from 69.5% against symptomatic infection to 78.8% against moderate-to-severe disease. (Funded by Medicago; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04636697 .)

No abstract