Aims Spain has been one of the worst affected countries by the COVID-19 pandemic. A very strict lockdown at home was imposed with a tough restriction of mobility. We aimed to evaluate the impact of this exceptional scenario on glucose profile of patients with T1D prone to hypoglycemia using standalone continuous glucose monitoring. Methods Patients with T1D prone to hypoglycemia using multiple daily injections and either a Dexcom G5® or a Free Style Libre® CGM systems for at least 6 months under the funding of National Health Service were included in an observational, retrospective study. Data were collected in two periods: pre-lockdown (PL), February 23rd-March 7th and within lockdown (WL), April 1st–14th 2020. The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of time in target glucose range of 70–180 mg/dL (TIR). Additional glucometric data were also analysed. Results 92 patients were included: 40 women, age 42.8 ± 3.9 years, disease duration of 23.1 ± 12.6 years. Seventeen patients used Dexcom G5® and 75 Free Style Libre®. TIR 70–180 mg/dL (59.3 ± 16.2 vs 62.6 ± 15.2%), time > 180 (34.4 ± 18.0 vs 30.7 ± 16.9%), >250 (11.1 ± 10.6 vs 9.2 ± 9.7%) and Glucose Management Indicator (7.2 ± 0.8 vs 7.0 ± 0.8%) significantly improved (PL vs WL, respectively, p < 0.05). Time in hypoglycemia remained unchanged. Conclusions Lockdown conditions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic may be managed successfully in terms of glycemic control by population with T1D prone to hypoglycemia using CGM. The strict daily routine at home could probably explain the improvement in the time in glycemic target without increasing the time in hypoglycemia.
(1) Background: nocturnal hypoglycemia (NH) is one of the most challenging side effects of multiple doses of insulin (MDI) therapy in type 1 diabetes (T1D). This work aimed to investigate the feasibility of a machine-learning-based prediction model to anticipate NH in T1D patients on MDI. (2) Methods: ten T1D adults were studied during 12 weeks. Information regarding T1D management, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and from a physical activity tracker were obtained under free-living conditions at home. Supervised machine-learning algorithms were applied to the data, and prediction models were created to forecast the occurrence of NH. Individualized prediction models were generated using multilayer perceptron (MLP) and a support vector machine (SVM). (3) Results: population outcomes indicated that more than 70% of the NH may be avoided with the proposed methodology. The predictions performed by the SVM achieved the best population outcomes, with a sensitivity and specificity of 78.75% and 82.15%, respectively. (4) Conclusions: our study supports the feasibility of using ML techniques to address the prediction of nocturnal hypoglycemia in the daily life of patients with T1D on MDI, using CGM and a physical activity tracker.
The control of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in young subjects is especially troublesome in adolescence. In this period, young T1D subjects are usually transferred to adult diabetes units. Transfer conditions could be a determinant factor to achieve adequate treatment compliance and optimal metabolic control.The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a specifically designed transition therapeutic education programme (TEP) on glycaemic control, self-management and quality of life, 12 months after the transfer of young subjects with T1D from a paediatric to an adult diabetes unit.The study included 80 young T1D subjects (aged 19.0±1.3 years, 39 females, T1D duration 7.3±1. In all, 72 out of 80 subjects completed the TEP. We observed an improvement in metabolic control (HbA 1c 8.5±1.7 vs 7.4±1.5, p<0.001) with a decrease in the number of hypoglycaemic episodes (severe: 0.39 vs 0.14 episodes/patient/year, p<0.001; >5 non-severe/weak: 15% vs 0% patients, p<0.005). There were no differences in terms of total daily insulin dose. However, an increase was observed in the proportion of rapid-acting insulin (23% vs 52%, p<0.001). After 12 months of TEP, a higher proportion of subjects were able to perform self-adjustment of insulin doses (13% vs 48%, p<0.001). Likewise, TEP improved their knowledge in T1D management (DKQ2 25/35 vs 29/35, p<0.001) without worsening the quality of life score.In conclusion, the use of a special transition TEP achieves an improvement in metabolic control and self-management abilities without worsening the quality of life of young T1D subjects transferred from a paediatric to an adult diabetes unit.
Highlights Almost two thirds of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection present with hypocalcemia at hospital admission. Hypocalcemia at admission is related to high oxygen support requirement any time during hospitalization. Patients with hypocalcemia at admission had two times more probability to be admitted to the Intensive Care Unit during hospitalization than patients with normal calcium at admission.
Aims Spain has been one of the worst affected countries by the COVID-19 pandemic. A very strict lockdown at home was imposed with a tough restriction of mobility. We aimed to evaluate the impact of this exceptional scenario on glucose profile of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) prone to hypoglycaemia using sensor-augmented pump (SAP). Methods Patients with T1D prone to hypoglycaemia using SAP (640G Medtronic-Minimed ® ) for at least 6 months under the funding of a National Health Service were included in an observational, retrospective study. Data were collected in two periods: pre-lockdown (PL), February 23rd–March 7th and within lockdown (WL), April 1st to 14th 2020. The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of time in target glucose range of 70–180 mg/dL (TIR). Additional glucometric data and total daily insulin were also analysed. Results Fifty-nine patients were included: 33 women, age 46.17 ± 13.0 years and disease duration of 30.2 ± 12.0 years. TIR 70–180 mg/dL (67.6 ± 11.8 vs. 69.8 ± 12.0%), time > 180 (28.1 ± 13.6 vs. 25.5 ± 13.1%), time > 250 (6.9 ± 6.1 vs. 5.1 ± 4.8) and estimated HbA 1c (6.94 ± 0.8 vs. 6.75 ± 0.7%) significantly improved (PL vs. WL, respectively, p < 0.05). Time in hypoglycaemia, coefficient of variation, sensor usage and total daily insulin dose remained unchanged. Conclusions Lockdown conditions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic may be managed successfully in terms of glycaemia control by population with DT1 prone to hypoglycaemia using SAP. The strict daily routine at home could probably explain the improvement in the time in glycemic target without increasing the time hypoglycaemia.
Aim The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH) on metabolic control and pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes. Material and Methods This was a single‐centre prospective cohort study of singleton pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. IAH was assessed at the first antenatal visit using Clarke's test (score ≥ 3). Data on metabolic control, hypoglycaemic events, and the lipid profile were collected from prior to pregnancy and in each trimester of gestation. Pregnancy outcomes were also recorded. Results A total of 77 patients with type 1 diabetes were included; 24 (31.2%) were classified as having IAH. Compared with the normal awareness of hypoglycaemia (NAH) group, the IAH group did not show differences in HbA1c, weight gain, insulin doses, or severe and nonsevere hypoglycaemia events throughout pregnancy. IAH was associated with higher triglyceride concentrations in the second trimester (IAH: 154.8 ± 61.1 mg/dL, NAH: 128.6 ± 31.2 mg/dL, P = .034) and an increased risk of neonatal respiratory distress (odds ratio [OR] 11.24; 95% CI, 1.01‐124.9, P = .041) in adjusted models. Increased risk of pre‐eclampsia was related to higher second trimester triglyceride concentrations (OR 1.028; 95% CI, 1.004‐1.053, P = .023) adjusted for confounders. Conclusions The IAH was associated with increased risk of neonatal respiratory distress and pre‐eclampsia, despite showing no differences in metabolic control. Hypoglycaemia awareness in the first antenatal visit should be assessed to identify the subgroup of pregnant women with increased risk of complications.
Aim: Although insulin resistance (IR) is a growing trait among type 1 diabetes (T1D) population, its relationship with atherosclerosis has been scarcely studied. We assessed the association between IR indexes and carotid atherosclerosis in T1D, a population at high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 191 participants with T1D and no prior CVD with at least one of the following criteria: ≥40 years old; diabetic nephropathy; or T1D duration ≥10 years harbouring ≥1 additional CVD risk factor. IR was assessed with the metabolic syndrome (MetS) harmonized definition proposed in 2009 and the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), a T1D-specific IR surrogate marker (lower values indicating higher IR). Standardized carotid ultrasonography was performed, recording intima-media thickness (IMT), plaque presence and maximum height of plaque. Comparisons between patients according to their MetS status as well as concerning eGDR values were performed. Results: The participants' median age was 47.4 (41.1-53.3) years and diabetes duration 25.7 (21.6-32.5) years. Plaque prevalence was higher in patients with greater IR (49.1%, 29.1% and 20%, P = .001, for any plaque according to decreasing eGDR tertiles). Conversely, no statistically significant higher plaque prevalence was found in participants with MetS. In multivariate analyses (adjusted for general-and T1Dspecific risk factors, and statin treatment), MetS was associated with neither IMT nor plaque. On the contrary, eGDR was independently related to ≥2 plaques (P = .018) and maximum plaque height (P < .01). Conclusions: In T1D, IR assessed through eGDR but not by MetS definition was independently associated with plaque burden, a predictor of CVD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.