No abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in outpatients with coronary artery disease (CAD) living alone compared with those living with others.MethodsThe prospeCtive observational LongitudinAl RegIstry oF patients with stable coronarY artery disease (CLARIFY) included outpatients with stable CAD. CLARIFY enrolled participants in 45 countries from November 2009 to July 2010, with 5 years of follow-up. Living arrangement was documented at baseline. The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) defined as CV death, myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke.ResultsAmong 32 367 patients, 3648 patients were living alone (11.3%). After multivariate adjustment, there were no residual differences in MACE among patients living alone compared with those living with others (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.18, p=0.52); however, there was significant heterogeneity in the exposure effect by sex (Pinteraction<0.01). Specifically, men living alone were at higher risk for MACE (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.002 to 1.36, p=0.047) as opposed to women living alone (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.04, p=0.1), predominantly driven by a heterogeneous effect by sex on MI (Pinteraction=0.006). There was no effect modification for MACE by age group (Pinteraction=0.3), although potential varying effects by age for MI (Pinteraction=0.046) and stroke (Pinteraction=0.05).ConclusionsLiving alone was not associated with an independent increase in MACE, although significant sex-based differences were apparent. Men living alone may have a worse prognosis from CV disease than women; further analyses are needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying this difference.Trial registration numberISRCTN43070564.

This paper describes the opportunities and challenges in building ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) systems of care in Stent for Life affiliated and collaborating so-called emerging countries, namely India, China, South Africa and Mexico, where CAD mortality is increasing and becoming a significant healthcare problem. The Stent for Life model supports the implementation of ESC STEMI Guidelines in Europe and endeavours to impact on morbidity and mortality by improving services and developing regional STEMI systems of care, whereby STEMI patients' timely access to a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is assured. In India, the STEMI India model incorporates a dual approach of combining PPCI with a pharmacoinvasive strategy of reperfusion. The architecture of the system is based on a hub and spoke model with each unit called a STEMI cluster. The project is driven by a private non-profit organisation. In China, the STEMI PCI programme is led by the Chinese College of Cardiovascular Physicians and supported by the national government. Although primary PCI is performed nationwide, a thrombolytic treatment strategy is still the first option in many rural areas because of logistic considerations. Establishing local STEMI transfer networks and then implementing a pharmacoinvasive strategy of reperfusion are being considered and promoted currently. In South Africa, the pharmacoinvasive approach currently dominates as STEMI treatment option in many areas. A pilot study shows that low symptom awareness leads to long patient delays. The education of all role players, from patients to healthcare professionals and including institutions and governmental structures, is needed to achieve prompt diagnosis and treatment. In Mexico, improving the treatment of STEMI requires considering myocardial infarction to be an emergency that must be treated by an entire system and not just by a particular service. Patients need to receive quick treatment from clinical and interventional cardiologists, and the emergency medical system (EMS) must understand the importance of early reperfusion therapy when appropriate. Mexican health authorities have used registries as their main strategy for improving the use of health resources for ACS patients. In general, building regional STEMI systems of care and an EMS system infrastructure are critical success factors in the stepwise development of STEMI systems of care at a national level in emerging countries as they are in Europe. An in-depth understanding of healthcare system-level barriers to timely and appropriate reperfusion therapy facilitates the development of more effective strategies for improving the quality of STEMI care in each region and country.

La pandemia del Coronavirus es una de las más devastadoras de este siglo. Originada en China en diciembre de 2019 y causada por el virus SARS-CoV-2, en menos de 1 mes ya había sido catalogada como "Emergencia de Salud Pública de Alcance Internacional". A la fecha hay cerca de 3 millones de personas con infección confirmada y ha provocado más de 250,000 fallecimientos en el mundo. Inicialmente afecta las vías respiratorias con neumonías atípica y en casos graves provoca inflamación sistémica con liberación de citoquinas que pueden provocar un rápido deterioro, insuficiencia circulatoria, respiratoria y alteraciones de coagulación con una letalidad cercana al 7%. En México, el primer caso se detectó en febrero del 2020, y a la fecha de esta publicación se cuenta con 29,616 casos confirmados y 2,961 fallecimientos en toda la extensión de país. La baja tasa de muestreo diagnóstico en nuestro país claramente subestima la incidencia e impacto de esta enfermedad. Los grupos mas afectados son aquéllos con factores de riesgo como lo son la edad mayor a 60 años, hipertensión, diabetes o historia de enfermedad cardiovascular. De los casos confirmados, 15% son trabajadores del sector salud. No existe hasta ahora un tratamiento específico o vacuna, de tal manera que es importante contar con las medidas de higiene, aislamiento social y protección personal. Las consecuencias en salud, sociales y económicas podrían ser de gran impacto en los tiempos por venir.

Background: Atherothrombosis, a generalized and progressive process, is currently a major healthcare problem in Mexico. Methods: The worldwide Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) registry aimed to evaluate risk factors for atherosclerosis, long-term cardiovascular (CV) event rates, and current management of either patients with established symptomatic atherosclerotic disease or asymptomatic subjects with multiple risk factors for atherothrombotic disease. One-year follow-up of the global REACH database was available for 64 977 outpatients. This report includes the Mexican subregistry wherein 62 internists, cardiologists, and neurologists evaluated baseline patient characteristics, risk factors, medications, and CV event rates as primary outcomes at 1-year follow-up. Results: Complete 1-year follow-up data were available for 837 Mexicans. We observed a high prevalence of diabetes (47.1%), hypertension (74.7%), and hypercholesterolemia (57.8%). Antiplatelet, antihypertensive and/or glucose-lowering agents, and lipid-lowering drugs were used in 87.6%, 84.1%, and 61% of patients, respectively. The all-cause mortality rate was 3.3%. The composite outcome CV death/myocardial infarction/stroke/hospitalization for atherothrombotic events was higher in the symptomatic group (14.6%) than in asymptomatic subjects with multiple risk factors (5.1%; P = 0.01), similar to Latin American results of the global REACH report. The highest CV event rate occurred among symptomatic atherothrombotic patients with 3 vascular disease locations (30.2%), followed by those with 2 (21.9%) and 1 location (13.4%; P = 0.0006). Conclusions: Prevalence of risk factors and CV event rates including hospitalization in Mexican atherothrombotic patients was high despite the current medication use, which suggests it is necessary to have more aggressive risk-factor management.The REACH registry is sponsored by sanofi-aventis, BristolMyers Squibb, and the Waksman Foundation of Japan (Tokyo, Japan). The REACH registry is endorsed by the World Heart Federation. A complete list of REACH investigators is accessible online at www.reachregistry.org. The REACH registry enforces a no-ghostwriting policy. This manuscript was written and edited by the authors, who take full responsibility for its content. The first draft was written by Dr. Efraín Gaxiola. All manuscripts in the REACH registry are prepared by independent authors who are not governed by the funding sponsors and are reviewed by an academic publications committee before submission. The funding sponsors have the opportunity to review manuscript submissions but do not have authority to change any aspect of a manuscript. Dr. Efraín Gaxiola has received research grants from sanofiaventis, speaker fees from Pfizer and Eli Lilly, and fees as an advisory board member from Abbott Labs and Pfizer. Dr. Luis Eng-Ceceña has received speaker fees from sanofi-aventis, Pfizer, Bayer, and AstraZeneca, and fees as advisory board member from Schering-Plough. Dr. Fernando Ortiz-Galván