No abstract

No abstract

The crucial role of pituitary GnRH receptors (GnRH-R) in the control of reproductive functions is well established. These receptors are the target of GnRH agonists (through receptor desensitization) and antagonists (through receptor blockade) for the treatment of steroid-dependent pathologies, including hormone-dependent tumors. It has also become increasingly clear that GnRH-R are expressed in cancer tissues, either related (i.e. prostate, breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancers) or unrelated (i.e. melanoma, glioblastoma, lung, and pancreatic cancers) to the reproductive system. In hormone-related tumors, GnRH-R appear to be expressed even when the tumor has escaped steroid dependence (such as castration-resistant prostate cancer). These receptors are coupled to a G(αi)-mediated intracellular signaling pathway. Activation of tumor GnRH-R by means of GnRH agonists elicits a strong antiproliferative, antimetastatic, and antiangiogenic (more recently demonstrated) activity. Interestingly, GnRH antagonists have also been shown to elicit a direct antitumor effect; thus, these compounds behave as antagonists of GnRH-R at the pituitary level and as agonists of the same receptors expressed in tumors. According to the ligand-induced selective-signaling theory, GnRH-R might assume various conformations, endowed with different activities for GnRH analogs and with different intracellular signaling pathways, according to the cell context. Based on these consistent experimental observations, tumor GnRH-R are now considered a very interesting candidate for novel molecular, GnRH analog-based, targeted strategies for the treatment of tumors expressing these receptors. These agents include GnRH agonists and antagonists, GnRH analog-based cytotoxic (i.e. doxorubicin) or nutraceutic (i.e. curcumin) hybrids, and GnRH-R-targeted nanoparticles delivering anticancer compounds.

Prostate cancer growth depends, in its earlier stages, on androgens and is usually pharmacologically modulated with androgen blockade. However, androgen-ablation therapy may generate androgen-independent prostate cancer, often characterized by an increased invasiveness. We have found that the 5A-reduced testosterone derivative, dihydrotestosterone (the most potent natural androgen) inhibits cell migration with an androgen receptor-independent mechanism. We have shown that the dihydrotestosterone metabolite 5A-androstane-3B,17B-diol (3B-Adiol), a steroid which does not bind androgen receptors, but efficiently binds the estrogen receptor B (ERB), exerts a potent inhibition of prostate cancer cell migration through the activation of the ERB signaling. Very surprisingly, estradiol is not active, suggesting the existence of different pathways for ERB activation in prostate cancer cells. Moreover, 3B-Adiol, through ERB, induces the expression of E-cadherin, a protein known to be capable of blocking metastasis formation in breast and prostate cancer cells. The inhibitory effects of 3B-Adiol on prostate cancer cell migration is counteracted by short interfering RNA against E-cadherin. Altogether, the data showed that (a) circulating testosterone may act with estrogenic effects downstream in the catabolic process present in the prostate, and (b) that the estrogenic effect of testosterone derivatives (ERB-dependent) results in the inhibition of cell migration, although it is apparently different from that linked to estradiol on the same receptor and may be protective against prostate cancer invasion and metastasis. These results also shed some light on clinical observations suggesting that alterations in genes coding for 3B-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases (the enzymes responsible for 3B-Adiol formation) are strongly correlated with hereditary prostate cancer. (Cancer Res 2005; 65(12): 5445-53)

Highly potent LH-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists have been recently introduced in therapy for the treatment of the carcinoma of the prostate, an androgen-dependent pathology. These peptides are believed to act mainly by inhibiting the pituitary-testicular axis and, consequently, by reducing testosterone levels. The recent observation that binding sites for LHRH analogs are present on prostatic tumor tissue suggests that these drugs could also act directly on the tumor. To verify this hypothesis, the effects of two potent LHRH agonists [Zoladex (Z) and Buserelin (B)] have been studied on the proliferation of the human prostatic cancer cell line LNCaP (lymph node carcinoma of the prostate). LNCaP cells were treated for 9 days with different doses of either Z or B (concentrations from 10(-12)-10(-6) M). Both analogs significantly inhibited cell proliferation at doses between 10(-9)-10(-6) M. The antiproliferative action of the two LHRH agonists was shown to be dose dependent, with IC50 values of 0.82 and 1.79 nM for Z and B, respectively. A similar treatment with B was without any significant effect on the proliferation of a mouse embryo fibroblast cell line (Swiss 3T3), which was used as a nontumoral control. The inhibitory action of both LHRH agonists (10(-8) M) on LNCaP cell proliferation was completely antagonized by the simultaneous treatment of the cells with a potent LHRH antagonist (Nal-Arg-LHRH; 10(-8) M); when given alone at the dose selected, the antagonist did not affect cell growth. These results clearly suggest that the antiproliferative effect of LHRH agonists on LNCaP cells may be mediated by specific receptors. The presence of binding sites for [125I]B was consequently demonstrated on the membranes of LNCaP cells cultured in a medium containing charcoal-stripped fetal calf serum, i.e. in the absence of steroids. The affinity of these binding sites for the ligand was lower than that observed for the same receptors on rat pituitary membranes. To clarify the mechanism of the antiproliferative action of the LHRH agonists, the effects of both Z and B on the incorporation of [3H]thymidine and [14C]methionine into LNCaP cells were investigated. During a short incubation period (3 h), the two LHRH agonists rapidly inhibited [3H]thymidine incorporation into the cells. The same treatment did not affect the incorporation of [14C]methionine into proteins.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

No abstract

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) is the hypothalamic decapeptide which plays a key role in the control of reproductive functions. By binding to specific receptors present on the pituitary gonadotropes, GnRH regulates gonadotropin release and, consequently, steroid hormone secretion from the gonads. When given continuously and at high doses, GnRH agonists suppress the pituitary gonadal axis through the down-regulation and desensitization of its own receptors. Based on this rationale, pituitary GnRH receptors represent the target for the successful utilization of GnRH agonists (that are more stable than the native peptide) for the treatment of hormone-dependent tumors (e.g., prostate, breast, endometrial, ovarian cancers). The observation that GnRH receptors are expressed in steroid-dependent tumors, and that their activation reduces cell proliferation and metastatic behavior of cancer cell lines, both in vitro and in vivo (when inoculated into nude mice), indicates a possible additional and more direct antitumor activity for these compounds. Interestingly, GnRH receptors have been shown to be expressed also in androgen-independent prostate carcinoma, as well as in tumors that are not classically considered hormone-related (e.g., melanoma), suggesting a clinical utility of the administration of GnRH analogs also in these tumors. More recently, GnRH agonists have been proposed as useful carriers to target cytotoxic drugs or toxins to cancer cells displaying the specific GnRH receptors. A second form of GnRH (designated GnRH-II) has been discovered in most vertebrates, including humans. GnRH-II has been suggested to act through a 'putative' cognate type II GnRH receptor, which is distributed in different tissues, both normal and tumoral. In humans, a full-length functional type II GnRH receptor has not been found. Therefore, its functions as well as its possible utility as a molecular target for a GnRH-II based therapy in oncology still has to be clarified. This review will focus on the role of GnRH receptors in the control of tumor growth, progression and dissemination. It will also be discussed whether the presence of these receptors might represent an additional rationale for the clinical utility of GnRH analogs as anticancer drugs.

FL increases with the amount of fat mass; the prevalence of FL in normal weight women in comparison to men suggests that this fraction is particularly linked to the amount of subcutaneous fat. Moreover, the correlation of BL with REE and the relationship of FL with food intake favours the view of different biological activities for the two circulating forms of leptin.