No abstract

Background and aims: Covid-19 virus started from Wuhan, China and has brought the world down to its knees. It has catapulted as a venomous global phenomenon. This study focuses on the Covid-19 situation in India and its recovery time. Method: The study period is from March 1, 2020 to April 25, 2020. A random sample of 221 individuals found positive with Covid-19 from March 1, 2020 to 31st March is included in the study which is followed up April 25, 2020. There is a male preponderance in the sample with 66% of the Covid-19 patients being male and about 34% being female. Kaplan-Meier Product limit estimator, Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Log-rank test are used to analyze the recovery time of Covid-19 patients. Result: From the results of the study, it is found that the average recovery time of Covid-19 patients in India is 25 days (95% C.I. 16 days to 34 days). Only 4% of the patients get cured after 10 days of treatment. The recovery time of male and female patients is not statistically different. Recovery time of patients belonging to different age groups is also not statistically significant. Conclusion: This information on recovery time of Covid-19 patients will help planners to chalk out effective strategies.

Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) is one of the common forms of haematological malignancy in adults. We analysed the prevalence and clinical significance of FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) and Nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) mutations in AML patients of North East India. Co-prevalence and clinical significance of three recurrent chromosomal translocations namely t(15; 17), t(8; 21), t(16; 16) and expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), flow markers were also documented and co-related with disease progress. We analysed bone marrow aspirates or peripheral blood samples from 165 newly diagnosed AML patients. All clinical samples were analysed by Real Time PCR and DNA sequencing based assays. NPM1 was the most frequently detected mutation in the study population (46/165 = 27.90%, 95% CI 20.75-35.05). FLT3 mutations were detected in 27/165 (16.40%, 95% CI 10.45-22.35) patients with internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) in 24/165 (14.60%, 95% CI 8.91-20.29) and FLT3-D835 in 3/165 (1.80%, 95% CI 0-4.13) patients. NPM1 mutations were associated with a higher complete remission rate and longer overall survival ( < 0.01) compared to FLT3-ITD whereas FLT3-ITD showed adverse impact with poor survival rate ( < 0.01), leukocytosis ( < 0.01) and a packed bone marrow. EGFR expression was more in patients with NPM1 mutation compared to FLT3 mutation ( = 0.09). Patients with FLT3 and NPM1 mutations uniformly expressed CD13 and CD33 whereas CD34 was associated with poor prognosis ( ≤ 0.01) in patients with NPM1 mutation. FLT3-ITD was associated with inferior overall survival. However the clinical significance of FLT3-D835 was not clear due to small number of samples. NPM1 mutation showed better prognosis with increased response to treatment in the absence of FLT3-ITD.

Objectives The current research aimed to develop a questionnaire for the evaluation of the staff viewpoints in mobile phone use in the delivery of their services and then to assess the primary health center staff attitudes toward this area. Methods This was a two-stage cross-sectional study. In the initial stage, a questionnaire was constructed that tested their reliability and validity through Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, multitrait/multi-item correlation matrix and multivariate method of factor analysis. In the second phase, we computed the raw score of each construct which was calculated by taking the mean of the responses of all the items in a particular construct. The normality of the scores for each construct was tested via Kolmogorov-Smirnov and various parametric/non-parametric statistical tests were applied to compare the responses of the subjects. After statistical tests, the final questionnaire was confirmed, including 28 items. Results The final questionnaires’ five main axes consisted of health services efficiency, education, notices, consultation, as well as follow-up. Personnel perspective assessment indicates that there is no difference of view among individuals coming from various demographic features, including gender, age, work experience, as well as education level, to mobile phone use in their services. Conclusion The attitude of public health center staff to mobile phone use in providing health services was positive in general, which would be an influential context for the effective application of mobile phones in public health; such a context would result in users' intentions to use and accept m-Health.