Although the circadian clock is a self-sustaining oscillator having a periodicity of nearly 1 d, its period length is not necessarily 24 h. Therefore, daily adjustment of the clock (i.e., resetting) is an essential mechanism for the circadian clock to adapt to daily environmental changes. One of the major cues for this resetting mechanism is light. In the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, the circadian clock is reset by blue/green and red light. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain largely unknown. In this study, using clock protein-luciferase fusion reporters, we found that the level of RHYTHM OF CHLOROPLAST 15 (ROC15), a clock component in C. reinhardtii, decreased rapidly after light exposure in a circadian-phase-independent manner. Blue, green, and red light were able to induce this process, with red light being the most effective among them. Expression analyses and inhibitor experiments suggested that this process was regulated mainly by a proteasome-dependent protein degradation pathway. In addition, we found that the other clock gene, ROC114, encoding an F-box protein, was involved in this process. Furthermore, we demonstrated that a roc15 mutant showed defects in the phase-resetting of the circadian clock by light. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that the light-induced degradation of ROC15 protein is one of the triggers for resetting the circadian clock in C. reinhardtii. Our data provide not only a basis for understanding the molecular mechanisms of light-induced phase-resetting in C. reinhardtii, but also insights into the phase-resetting mechanisms of circadian clocks in plants.LUCnc | light pulse | phase shift C ircadian rhythms, observed ubiquitously in organisms from prokaryotic cyanobacteria to humans, are generated by the circadian clock, which is thought to rely on transcriptional/translational feedback loops and posttranslational biochemical oscillations of some genes and their protein products called clock genes/proteins (1-4). Clock genes/proteins have been identified in several organisms, including mammals, insects, fungi, land plants, cyanobacteria, and, recently, green algae (1, 2, 5-8). Except for general kinases and phosphatases (9), most of the components of circadian clocks are not conserved among evolutionarily divergent organisms. On the other hand, the components are conserved to some extent between organisms that are relatively close evolutionarily (i.e., mammals and insects, land plants and green algae) (6-8, 10).The clock components in algae were first identified in the model green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. There are the RNAbinding protein complex CHLAMY1 (11), a casein kinase (12), and RHYTHM OF CHLOROPLAST (ROC) proteins, including putative DNA-binding proteins (ROC15, ROC40, ROC66, and ROC75), an F-box protein (ROC114), and a leucine-rich repeat protein (ROC55) (13). The DNA-binding motifs of ROC proteins are homologous to those of Arabidopsis thaliana proteins associated with the circadian clock and photoperiodic flowering (13)...

C-to-U RNA editing has been widely observed in organellar RNAs in terrestrial plants. Recent research has revealed the significance of a large, plant-specific family of pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins for RNA editing and other RNA processing events in plant mitochondria and chloroplasts. PPR protein is a sequence-specific RNA-binding protein that identifies specific C residues for editing. Discovery of the RNA recognition code for PPR motifs, including verification and prediction of the individual RNA editing site and its corresponding PPR protein, expanded our understanding of the molecular function of PPR proteins in plant organellar RNA editing. Using this knowledge and the co-expression database, we have identified two new PPR proteins that mediate chloroplast RNA editing. Further, computational target assignment using the PPR RNA recognition codes suggests a distinct, unknown mode-of-action, by which PPR proteins serve a function beyond site recognition in RNA editing.

Horizontal gene transfer can occur between phylogenetically distant organisms, such as prokaryotes and eukaryotes. In these cases, how do the translocated genes acquire transcriptional competency in the alien genome environment? According to the conventional view, specific loci of the eukaryotic genome are thought to provide transcriptional competency to the incoming coding sequences. To examine this possibility, we randomly introduced the promoterless luciferase (LUC)-coding sequences into the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana cultured cells and performed a genome-wide “transgene location vs. expression” scan. We found that one-third of the 4,504 mapped LUC genes were transcribed. However, only 10% of them were explained by conventional transcriptional fusions with the annotated genes, and the remainder of the genes exhibited novel transcription that occurred independently of the chromatin configuration or transcriptional activity inherent to the given chromosomal locus; rather, their transcriptional activation occurred stochastically at about 30% of each insertion event, but independent of the integration sites. We termed this activation phenomenon as an integration-dependent stochastic transcriptional activation, a new type of response of the plant genome to incoming coding sequences. We discuss the possible roles of this phenomenon in the evolution of eukaryotic genomes.