ObjectiveFemale sex workers (FSWs) are at an increased risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as well as human papillomavirus (HPV) infections and thus have an increased risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical cancer. We evaluated the feasibility of “screen and treat approach” for cervical cancer prevention and the performance of different screening tests among FSWs.MethodsWomen were screened using cytology, VIA (visual inspection with acetic acid), and VILI (visual inspection with Lugol’s iodine) and underwent colposcopy, biopsy, and immediate treatment using cold coagulation, if indicated, at the same visit.ResultsWe screened 300 FSWs of whom 200 (66.67%) were HIV uninfected and 100 (33.34%) were HIV infected. The overall prevalence of CIN 2–3 lesions was 4.7%. But all women with CIN 2–3 lesions were HIV infected, and thus the prevalence of CIN 2–3 lesions in HIV-infected FSWs was 14/100 (14%, 95% confidence interval: 7.2–20.8). All of them screened positive by all three screening tests. Cold coagulation was well tolerated, with no appreciable side effects.ConclusionCervical cancer prevention by “screen and treat” approach using VIA, followed by ablative treatment, in this high-risk group of women is feasible and can be implemented through various targeted intervention programs.
We report the incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) among HIV-infected women who did not have any colposcopic or histopathological evidence of CIN at baseline. Of the 1,023 women without any CIN at baseline, 855 (83.6%) have been followed up to a maximum of 6.4 years contributing 2,875 person years of observation (PYO). Among these 855 women, 54 cases of any CIN were observed resulting in incidence rate of any CIN of 1.9 per 100 PYO. The median time for follow-up for women with any CIN was 3.0 (IQR 1.6-3.7) years. The cumulative incidence rate per 100 PYO of CIN 2 or worse lesion in women with HPV-18 infection at baseline was 13.3% (95% CI 5.1-26.8); in women with HPV-16 infection was 10.8% (95% CI 4.4-20.9); in women with HPV-31 infection was 4.2% (95% CI 0.9-11.7); and in women with other high-risk HPV infections was 5.4% (95% CI 2.6-9.7). HPV-18 infection at baseline contributed highest frequency of incident CIN 2 or worse lesions followed by HPV-16 infection; however, other high-risk HPV types were also responsible for substantial number of incident CIN. The elevated risk of CIN2+ disease in the study cohort was non-significant in women with CD4 count <200, possibly because of the small number of cases. Our results emphasize the need for regular cervical cancer screening of HIV-infected women and urgent implementation of cervical cancer screening services in HIV programs in India and other low and middle-income countries.
We are reporting (a) updated incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) among women who did not have colposcopic or histopathological disease at baseline and (b) disease outcomes among women treated for CIN and their follow‐up HPV status; in a cohort of women living with HIV (WHIV). The median overall follow‐up was 3.5 years (IQR 2.8‐4.3). The incidence of any CIN and that of CIN 2 or worse disease was 16.7 and 7.0 per 1000 person‐years of observation (PYO), respectively. Compared with women who were HPV negative at baseline, women who cleared HPV infection had 23.95 times increased risk of incident CIN 2 or worse lesions (95% CI 2.40‐661.07). Women with persistent HPV infection had 138.18 times increased risk of CIN 2 or worse lesions (95% CI 20.30‐3300.22). Complete disease regression was observed in 65.6% of the HPV positive women with high‐grade CIN and were treated with thermal ablation but HPV persistence was seen in 44.8% of those with high‐grade disease. Among those who did not have any disease at baseline and were also HPV negative, about 87% (95% CI 83.79‐89.48) women remained HPV negative during consecutive HPV test/s with the median interval of 3.5 years. Long‐term surveillance of WHIV treated for any CIN is necessary for the prevention of cervical cancer among them. Our study provides an early indication that the currently recommended screening interval of 3 to 5 years among WHIV may be extended to at least 5 years among HPV negative women. Increasing the screening interval can be cost saving and improve scalability among WHIV to support WHO's cervical cancer elimination initiative.
Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women (Arbyn et al., 2020). In 2018, the age-standardised incidence of cervical cancer was 13.1 per 100 000 women globally (Arbyn et al., 2020). Cervical cancer is a major public health problem specially among women from the low-and middle-income countries. India accounts to about a fifth of the global burden of cervical cancer and has contributed 97 000 cases and 60 000 deaths in 2018 (Arbyn et al., 2020). Screening and vaccination are two powerful tools that are currently available for preventing cervical cancer and have the potential to practically eliminate cervical cancer. Vaccination of adolescent girls is very promising especially in the countries that do not have screening programs in place.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.