No abstract

Summary The purpose of this systematic study was to provide an up to date and reliable quantitative summary of the relative benefits of various types of chemotherapy (non-platinum vs platinum, single-agent vs combination and carboplatin vs cisplatin) in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Also, to investigate whether well-defined patient subgroups benefit more or less from cisplatin-or carboplatinbased therapy. Meta-analyses were based on updated individual patient data from all available randomized controlled trials (published and unpublished), including 37 trials, 5667 patients and 4664 deaths. The results suggest that platinum-based chemotherapy is better than nonplatinum therapy, show a trend in favour of platinum combinations over single-agent platinum, and suggest that cisplatin and carboplatin are equally effective. There is no good evidence that cisplatin is more or less effective than carboplatin in any particular subgroup of patients.Keywords: meta-analysis; systematic review; randomized controlled trials; advanced ovarian cancer; chemotherapy Health care professionals and patients alike are becoming increasingly aware of the need to make medical decisions on the basis of up-to-date, objective and unbiased research (Chalmers and Haynes, 1994). The most reliable information results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Unfortunately, most RCTs, including those conducted in ovarian cancer, have been too small to demonstrate moderate treatment benefits with reliability, and many results have been inconclusive or contradictory. The Advanced Ovarian Cancer Trialists Group (AOCTG) recognized that the best means of synthesizing such randomized evidence is by systematic meta-analysis. In 1988, five meta-analyses of chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer using updated individual patient data were initiated. The first results were published in 1991 (AOCTG, 1991). The AOCTG recognized the importance of updating these results especially for the comparison of carboplatin and cisplatin, in which the data were relatively immature. The comparison of platinum analogues was considered of such clinical importance that further new investigations were initiated to identify whether any particular type of women or tumour would benefit more from either cisplatin-or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODSTrials were eligible for inclusion provided they examined first-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer, were properly randomized and made one of the treatment comparisons described below. Trials were identified by bibliographic searches using MEDLINE and CancerLit, by hand searching relevant meeting proceedings and by consulting trial registers (AOCTG, 1991). Both published and unpublished trials were included and updated data were sought for all randomized patients. All data were checked thoroughly and the final database entries for each trial were verified by the responsible trialist or data centre.All analyses were based on intention to treat. Survival analyses were stratified by trial, and t...

Subcutaneous infusion ports (SIPs) represent a valid method for long-term chemotherapy. The SIPs have several advantages over other methods of venous access: they are easy to implant under local anaesthesia, have less discomfort for the patients, allow low costs, can be implanted in day hospital, and can be managed ambulatorily. However, SIPs have delayed complications, frequently related to clinical conditions of the neoplastic patients, and immediate complications, often due to the placement technique. From March 1992 to March 1997 we placed, under local anaesthesia and under fluoroscopic control, 102 SIPs in 99 general oncology patients for long-term chemotherapy (88% solid, 12% haematological tumours). The percutaneous venous access devices were in the subclavian vein in 96% of the cases and in the internal jugular vein in 4% of them. Immediate complications were: 1 haemopneumothorax, which required thoracic aspirations and two blood transfusions, 1 loop of the tunneled part of the catheter without alterations in SIP function, and 1 left jugular thrombosis in a patient with subclavian veins already thrombosed. The venous access was in the subclavian vein in the first 2 cases, and it was not necessary to suspend the therapeutic program. In the third instance, implanted in jugular vein, it was necessary to remove the SIP. Delayed complications were: 1 necrosis of the skin over the port, 1 infection of subcutaneous pocket, 2 infections of the system, 1 catheter deconnection, and 3 catheter ruptures with embolization of the catheter tip. The SIPs were removed in all cases but 1 in whom infection was successfully treated by appropriate antibiotic therapy. Embolization of the catheter required removal from the pulmonary artery under fluoroscopic guidance in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. In conclusion, infection and thrombosis are the two major complications of SIP in general oncology patients. In these cases it is not necessary to remove systematically the system, but a cor rect therapy (antibiotic, fibrinolytic agents) can be utilized with good results. The catheter rupture is often due to the wear over the costoclavicular angle. The interventional radiology is the method of choice in the treatment of the catheter embolization by rupture or dislocation. The experience of the surgical and nursing staff is probably the most important factor in decreasing the total rate of complications.

No abstract

Objectives: To assess the feasibility and the activity, as well as the efficacy to treat meninges, of chemotherapy (CHT) containing high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) followed by radiation therapy (RT), without intrathecal CHT, in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma. Methods: Eligibility criteria were histologically proven diagnosis, disease limited to the CNS, age ≤70, ECOG performance status ≤3, HIV-negative and no prior treatment. Thirteen patients (1996–1999; median age 54 years) received two courses of vincristine 1.4 mg/m² day 1, MTX 3 g/m² days 3 and 10 and procarbazine 100 mg/m² days 1–14 every 4 weeks. Patients who achieved a complete remission were referred to RT, those with progressive disease were excluded from further study; all the remaining patients received a third course of CHT followed by RT. Results: Twelve patients responded to CHT (overall response rate = 92%, complete response rate = 77%): 9 underwent consolidation RT, 3 did not. Two patients experienced severe acute toxicity; lethal pulmonary thromboembolism and transient renal failure. Five patients relapsed: 2 after CHT and 3 after RT. Relapse was local in all cases, with a case of concomitant hepatic involvement. No cases of ocular or meningeal relapse were observed. In contrast to high-dose cytarabine-containing CHT, salvage therapy with temozolomide produced good results. Two patients died of treatment-related neurotoxicity. Six patients are alive with a median follow-up of 17 months, and a 2-year overall survival (OS) of 61%. The median survival of the 9 patients who completed the planned treatment is 25+ months with a 2-year OS of 80%. Conclusions: HD-MTX, procarbazine and vincristine followed by RT, without intrathecal therapy, produce similar results with respect to other HD-MTX-containing regimens. These results seem to suggest that adequate meningeal treatment is possible without intrathecal drug delivery, even in CSF-positive patients. Corroborating data from a larger series are, however, necessary. Temozolomide should be tested in relapsed patients in a phase II prospective trial.