Autologous stem cell transplantation with or without in vitro lymphocyte depletion has been suggested as a new treatment option for severe autoimmune diseases. We describe five patients with autoimmune diseases (CREST syndrome, myasthenia gravis and Hashimoto's thyroiditis, systemic lupus erythematosus, atopic dermatitis, and rheumatoid arthritis) who underwent autologous bone marrow (n = 1) or peripheral blood progenitor cell (n = 4) transplantation with unmanipulated grafts as treatment for the autoimmune disease in one case or as treatment for a malignant disorder with a concomitant autoimmune disorder in four cases. In all patients serological and clinical signs of the autoimmune disease recurred early or persisted. These observations should be regarded as a cautionary note concerning the efficacy of high-dose therapy followed by transplantation of unmanipulated autologous stem cells for treatment of severe autoimmune diseases.
Abstract. Allogeneic transplantation of selected CD34+ cells, rather than conventional transplantation of bone marrow (BM) harvest or peripheral blood (PB) leukapheresis products, has the advantage of reducing volume, facilitating storage and decreasing the amount of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and cell lysis products, as well as reducing the number of T-lymphocytes responsible for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Using biotinavidin immunoaffinity columns (Ceprate TM SC system, CellPro; Bothell, WA), CD34 + cells were selected from each of 20 allografts (12 G-CSF-mobilized PB and 8 BM ) collected from 14 HLA-identical normal healthy donors for transplantation. After the clinical-scale selection, the median concentration of CD34 + cells was 44.6% (range, 13% to 91%) in BM and 50.4% (range, 15% to 77%) in PB. Whereas 75% of the PB allografts had a CD34 + cell yield of more than 65%, only 37.5% of the BM allografts achieved such a yield, p < 0.01. The number of T-lymphocytes in the selected CD34 + cell allografts was reduced by two to three logs from a median of 4.2 × 10 9 to 7.8 × 10 5 CD3 + cells. The enrichment in CD34 + cells was 240-fold (range, 24-to 382-fold) in PB versus only 34-fold (range, 14-to 108-fold) in BM. Also, the enrichment in clonogenic cells was significantly more in PB (median value of 38.6-fold) than in BM (median value of 19.2-fold) and more in allografts from younger (< 50 years old) rather than older (≥ 50 years old) adult donors. A correlation was found between the percentage of CD34 or CD3 + cells before and after selection (r = 0.58 or r = 0.60, respectively, p < 0.05). Selective enrichment of the colony forming unitsgranulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) was found in all 20 allografts. The progenitor cell recovery after freezing and thawing was similar in BM and PB allografts, with a mean of about 60% for the CFU-GM and BFU-E. In the same six donors, the CD34 + cell yield was significantly more in the PB after mobilization (median 78.5%, range 50% to 90%) than in the BM before mobilization (median 41.5%, range 25% to 87%), p < 0.01. Ten patients with hematologic malignancies have been allotransplanted with 14 of the 20 selected CD34 + cells either combined BM + PB (n = 4) or single (n = 6) grafts. Seven patients did not develop acute GVHD, and only two patients developed ≥ grade II GVHD, one of whom developed only grade II GVHD that resolved after brief treatment with corticosteriods. Only one patient showed chronic GVHD (skin and liver). The low incidence and severity of GVHD seen in the present study (only 30%) could be due to the two-to three-log reduction of T-lymphocytes in the selected CD34 + cell allotransplants. All 10 patients had stable hematological recovery, and seven had full donor hematopoiesis. In conclusion, G-CSF-mobilized PB leukapheresis products undergoing selection of CD34 + cells have a greater yield and enrichment of progenitor cells than BM harvests collected from HLA-identical normal healthy donors for allogeneic transplantation. The low incidence and severity of both a...
We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (Bu/Cy/VP-16) as a preparative regimen prior to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Fifty-three patients with recurrent ( n=30), refractory ( n=20), or high-risk ( n=3) lymphoma were enrolled. The 10 patients with HD and 43 with NHL (median age: 46 years, range: 18-64) received busulfan (16 mg/kg), cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg), and etoposide (30 or 45 mg/kg) followed by ASCT. A total of 50 patients (94%) were consolidated in complete ( n=25) or partial ( n=25) remission, whereas 3 patients had chemoresistant disease before Bu/Cy/VP-16. Thirty-five patients (66%) had received prior radiotherapy (RT) excluding total body irradiation (TBI) as part of the conditioning regimen. The main nonhematological toxicities (grade II-IV according to the Bearman score) in 52 evaluable patients were mucositis (79%) and hepatic toxicity (15%). Severe veno-occlusive disease (VOD) occurred in three patients (5.8%) including one treatment-related death caused by VOD. Overall, treatment-related mortality was 3.8%. After a median follow-up for surviving patients of 21 months (range: 6-118), 20 patients (38%) are in continuous complete remission, 8 patients (15%) are alive in relapse, and 25 patients (47%) died. Probabilities of relapse, event-free survival, and overall survival at 3 years were 63% [95% confidence interval (CI): 48-79%], 31% (95% CI: 17-46%), and 43% (95% CI: 27-59%), respectively. In conclusion, Bu/Cy/VP-16 is an effective and well-tolerated conditioning regimen in patients with HD and NHL. Both toxicity and outcome were not significantly different in patients treated with 30 mg/kg and 45 mg/kg etoposide, respectively. The observed long-term results are even comparable to those published for other established high-dose protocols, including TBI-based regimens. However, further investigations are necessary to evaluate the value of Bu/Cy/VP-16 as a high-dose protocol for malignant lymphoma, especially in patients who have already received extensive RT.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.