SUMMARY Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3) plays a central role in protein synthesis by organizing the formation of the 43S preinitiation complex. Using genetic tag visualization by electron microscopy, we reveal the molecular organization of ten human eIF3 subunits, including an octameric core. The structure of eIF3 bears a close resemblance to that of the proteasome lid, with a conserved spatial organization of eight core subunits containing PCI and MPN domains that coordinate functional interactions in both complexes. We further show that eIF3 subunits a and c interact with initiation factors eIF1 and eIF1A, which control the stringency of start codon selection. Finally, we find that subunit j, which modulates messenger RNA interactions with the small ribosomal subunit, makes multiple independent interactions with the eIF3 octameric core. These results highlight the conserved architecture of eIF3 and how it scaffolds key factors that control translation initiation in higher eukaryotes, including humans.

A fast-cleaving version of the Varkud satellite ribozyme, called RG, shows an apparent cis-cleavage rate constant of 5 sec ؊1 , similar to the rates of protein enzymes that catalyze similar reactions. Here, we describe mutational, pH-rate, and kinetic solvent isotope experiments that investigate the identity and rate constant of the rate-limiting step in this reaction. Self-cleavage of RG exhibits a bell-shaped rate vs. pH profile with apparent pKas of 5.8 and 8.3, consistent with the protonation state of two nucleotides being important for the rate of cleavage. Cleavage experiments in heavy water (D2O) revealed a kinetic solvent isotope effect consistent with proton transfer in the rate-limiting step. A mutant RNA that disrupts a peripheral loop-loop interaction involved in RNA folding exhibits pH-and D2O-independent cleavage Ϸ10 3 -fold slower than wild type, suggesting that this mutant is limited by a different step than wild type. Substitution of adenosine 756 in the putative active-site loop with cytosine also decreases the cleavage rate Ϸ10 3 -fold, but the A756C mutant retains pH-and D2O-sensitivity similar to wild type, consistent with this mutant and wild type being limited by the chemical step of the reaction. These results suggest that the RG ribozyme provides a good experimental system to investigate the nature of fast, rate-limiting steps in a ribozyme cleavage reaction.kinetic solvent isotope effect ͉ kinetics ͉ Neurospora ͉ pH vs. rate S ince the discovery of RNA catalysis, several natural RNAs and many more RNA and DNA sequences obtained by in vitro selection have been shown to catalyze the cleavage and/or ligation of phosphodiester bonds, as well as other chemical activities. Recent work has begun to investigate the range of catalytic mechanisms used by ribozymes and to understand the similarities and differences with protein enzymes (1-3). The local environment of a folded RNA can shift the pK a of certain nucleobases by two or more pH units into the range where they could function as proton donors or acceptors in general acidbase catalysis, similar to histidines in their protein counterparts (4). Charged nucleobases could also participate in electrostatic stabilization in the transition state. Indeed, the bell-shaped rate vs. pH curves typical of protein enzymes that use general acid-base catalysis have been observed for certain hepatitis delta virus (HDV) ribozymes (5, 6) and Varkud satellite (VS) ribozyme (this study).Most previously characterized versions of the Neurospora VS ribozyme showed rather slow cis-or trans-cleavage apparent rate constants (k obs ) in the range of 1 min Ϫ1 or less and were only slightly affected by pH between pH 5.5 and 9.0 (7); however, a trans-ligating construct did exhibit pH dependence below pH 7.0 (8). Other observations have also raised the possibility that a protonated group could be involved in the rate-limiting step of a VS ribozyme reaction pathway. For example, Strobel and colleagues (9) observed pH-dependent rescue of a ligation reaction by using nucleo...

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3) is a key regulator of translation initiation, but its in vivo assembly and molecular functions remain unclear. Here we show that eIF3 from Neurospora crassa is structurally and compositionally similar to human eIF3. N. crassa eIF3 forms a stable 12-subunit complex linked genetically and biochemically to the 13th subunit, eIF3j, which in humans modulates mRNA start codon selection. Based on N. crassa genetic analysis, most subunits in eIF3 are essential. Subunits that can be deleted (e, h, k and l) map to the right side of the eIF3 complex, suggesting that they may coordinately regulate eIF3 function. Consistent with this model, subunits eIF3k and eIF3l are incorporated into the eIF3 complex as a pair, and their insertion depends on the presence of subunit eIF3h, a key regulator of vertebrate development. Comparisons to other eIF3 complexes suggest that eIF3 assembles around an eIF3a and eIF3c dimer, which may explain the coordinated regulation of human eIF3 levels. Taken together, these results show that Neurospora crassa eIF3 provides a tractable system for probing the structure and function of human-like eIF3 in the context of living cells.

SUMMARY Eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3), an essential multi-protein complex involved in translation initiation, is composed of 12 tightly associated subunits in humans. While the overall structure of eIF3 is known, the mechanism of its assembly and structural consequences of dysregulation of eIF3 subunit expression seen in many cancers is largely unknown. Here we show that subunits in eIF3 assemble into eIF3 in an interdependent manner. Assembly of eIF3 is governed primarily by formation of a helical bundle, composed of helices extending C-terminally from PCI-MPN domains in eight subunits. We propose that, while the minimal subcomplex of human-like eIF3 functional for translation initiation in cells consists of subunits a, b, c, f, g, i, and m, numerous other eIF3 subcomplexes exist under circumstances of subunit over- or underexpression. Thus, eIF3 subcomplexes formed or “released” due to dysregulated subunit expression may be determining factors contributing to eIF3-related cancers.