We present ACS, NICMOS, and Keck AO-assisted photometry of 20 Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) from the HST Cluster Supernova Survey. The SNe Ia were discovered over the redshift interval 0.623 < z < 1.415. Fourteen of these SNe Ia pass our strict selection cuts and are used in combination with the world's sample of SNe Ia to derive the best current constraints on dark energy. Ten of our new SNe Ia are beyond redshift z = 1, thereby nearly doubling the statistical weight of HST-discovered SNe Ia beyond this redshift. Our detailed analysis corrects for the recently identified correlation between SN Ia luminosity and host galaxy mass and corrects the NICMOS zeropoint at the count rates appropriate for very distant SNe Ia. Adding these supernovae improves the best combined constraint on dark energy density, ρ DE (z), at redshifts 1.0 < z < 1.6 by 18% (including systematic errors). For a flat ΛCDM universe, we find Ω Λ = 0.729 +0.014 −0.014 (68% CL including systematic errors). For a flat wCDM model, we measure a constant dark energy equation-of-state parameter w = −1.013 +0.068 −0.073 (68% CL). Curvature is constrained to ∼ 0.7% in the owCDM model and to ∼ 2% in a model in which dark energy is allowed to vary with parameters w 0 and w a . Tightening further the constraints on the time evolution of dark energy will require several improvements, including high-quality multi-passband photometry of a sample of several dozen z > 1 SNe Ia. We describe how such a sample could be efficiently obtained by targeting cluster fields with WFC3 on HST.The updated supernova Union2.1 compilation of 580 SNe is available at http://supernova.lbl.gov/Union ⋆ is less than the mass threshold. We begin by noting that.We can then integrate this probability over all true host masses less than the threshold:⋆ )P (m true ⋆ ) up to a normalization constant found by requiring the integral to be unity when integrating over all possible true masses. P (m true ⋆ ) is estimated from the observed distribution for each type of survey. The SNLS (Sullivan et al. 2010) and SDSS (Lampeitl et al. 2010) host masses were assumed to be representative of untargeted surveys, while the mass distribution in Kelly et al. (2010) was assumed typical of nearby targeted surveys. As these distributions are approximately log-normal, we use this model for P (m true ⋆) using the mean and RMS from the log of the host masses from these surveys (with the average measurement errors subtracted in quadrature), giving log 10 P (m true ⋆ ) = N (µ = 9.88, σ 2 = 0.92 2 ) for untargeted surveys and log 10 P (m true ⋆ ) = N (10.75, 0.66 2 ) for targeted surveys. When host mass measurements are available, P (m obs ⋆ |m true ⋆ ) is also modeled as a log-normal; when no measurement is available, a flat distribution is used.For a supernova from an untargeted survey with no host mass measurement (including supernovae presented in this paper which are not in a cluster), P (m trueis the integral of P (m true ⋆ ) up to the threshold mass: 0.55. Similarly, nearby supernovae from targeted surveys w...
We present measurements of the baryon acoustic peak at redshifts z = 0.44, 0.6 and 0.73 in the galaxy correlation function of the final data set of the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey. We combine our correlation function with lower redshift measurements from the 6-degree Field Galaxy Survey and Sloan Digital Sky Survey, producing a stacked survey correlation function in which the statistical significance of the detection of the baryon acoustic peak is 4.9σ relative to a zero-baryon model with no peak. We fit cosmological models to this combined baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data set comprising six distance-redshift data points, and compare the results with similar cosmological fits to the latest compilation of supernovae (SNe) and cosmic microwave background (CMB) data. The BAO and SNe data sets produce consistent measurements of the equation-of-state w of dark energy, when separately combined with the CMB, providing a powerful check for systematic errors in either of these distance probes. Combining all data sets we determine w = −1.03 ± 0.08 for a flat universe, consistent with a cosmological constant model. Assuming dark energy is a cosmological constant and varying the spatial curvature, we find k = −0.004 ± 0.006.
The Dark Energy Camera is a new imager with a 2°. 2 diameter field of view mounted at the prime focus of the Victor M. Blanco 4m telescope on Cerro Tololo near La Serena, Chile. The camera was designed and constructed by the Dark Energy Survey Collaborationand meets or exceeds the stringent requirements designed for the widefield and supernova surveys for which the collaboration uses it. The camera consists of a five-element optical corrector, seven filters, a shutter with a 60 cm aperture, and a charge-coupled device (CCD) focal plane of 250 μm thick fully depleted CCDs cooled inside a vacuum Dewar. The 570 megapixel focal plane comprises 62 2k × 4k CCDs for imaging and 12 2k × 2k CCDs for guiding and focus. The CCDs have 15 μm × 15 μm pixels with a plate scale of 0 263 pixel −1. A hexapod system provides state-of-the-art focus and alignment capability. The camera is read out in 20 s with 6-9 electronreadout noise. This paper provides a technical description of the cameraʼs engineering, construction, installation, and current status.
We perform a joint determination of the distance–redshift relation and cosmic expansion rate at redshifts z = 0.44, 0.6 and 0.73 by combining measurements of the baryon acoustic peak and Alcock–Paczynski distortion from galaxy clustering in the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey, using a large ensemble of mock catalogues to calculate the covariance between the measurements. We find that DA(z) = (1205 ± 114, 1380 ± 95, 1534 ± 107) Mpc and H(z) = (82.6 ± 7.8, 87.9 ± 6.1, 97.3 ± 7.0) km s−1 Mpc−1 at these three redshifts. Further combining our results with other baryon acoustic oscillation and distant supernovae data sets, we use a Monte Carlo Markov Chain technique to determine the evolution of the Hubble parameter H(z) as a stepwise function in nine redshift bins of width Δz = 0.1, also marginalizing over the spatial curvature. Our measurements of H(z), which have precision better than 7 per cent in most redshift bins, are consistent with the expansion history predicted by a cosmological constant dark energy model, in which the expansion rate accelerates at redshift z < 0.7.
We present precise measurements of the growth rate of cosmic structure for the redshift range 0.1 < z < 0.9, using redshift‐space distortions in the galaxy power spectrum of the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey. Our results, which have a precision of around 10 per cent in four independent redshift bins, are well fitted by a flat Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) cosmological model with matter density parameter Ωm= 0.27. Our analysis hence indicates that this model provides a self‐consistent description of the growth of cosmic structure through large‐scale perturbations and the homogeneous cosmic expansion mapped by supernovae and baryon acoustic oscillations. We achieve robust results by systematically comparing our data with several different models of the quasi‐linear growth of structure including empirical models, fitting formulae calibrated to N‐body simulations, and perturbation theory techniques. We extract the first measurements of the power spectrum of the velocity divergence field, Pθθ(k), as a function of redshift (under the assumption that , where g is the galaxy overdensity field), and demonstrate that the WiggleZ galaxy–mass cross‐correlation is consistent with a deterministic (rather than stochastic) scale‐independent bias model for WiggleZ galaxies for scales k < 0.3 h Mpc−1. Measurements of the cosmic growth rate from the WiggleZ Survey and other current and future observations offer a powerful test of the physical nature of dark energy that is complementary to distance–redshift measures such as supernovae and baryon acoustic oscillations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.