Background In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of tocilizumab in adult patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 with both hypoxia and systemic inflammation. Methods This randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial (Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy [RECOVERY]), is assessing several possible treatments in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in the UK. Those trial participants with hypoxia (oxygen saturation <92% on air or requiring oxygen therapy) and evidence of systemic inflammation (C-reactive protein ≥75 mg/L) were eligible for random assignment in a 1:1 ratio to usual standard of care alone versus usual standard of care plus tocilizumab at a dose of 400 mg–800 mg (depending on weight) given intravenously. A second dose could be given 12–24 h later if the patient's condition had not improved. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ISRCTN (50189673) and ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04381936 ). Findings Between April 23, 2020, and Jan 24, 2021, 4116 adults of 21 550 patients enrolled into the RECOVERY trial were included in the assessment of tocilizumab, including 3385 (82%) patients receiving systemic corticosteroids. Overall, 621 (31%) of the 2022 patients allocated tocilizumab and 729 (35%) of the 2094 patients allocated to usual care died within 28 days (rate ratio 0·85; 95% CI 0·76–0·94; p=0·0028). Consistent results were seen in all prespecified subgroups of patients, including those receiving systemic corticosteroids. Patients allocated to tocilizumab were more likely to be discharged from hospital within 28 days (57% vs 50%; rate ratio 1·22; 1·12–1·33; p<0·0001). Among those not receiving invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline, patients allocated tocilizumab were less likely to reach the composite endpoint of invasive mechanical ventilation or death (35% vs 42%; risk ratio 0·84; 95% CI 0·77–0·92; p<0·0001). Interpretation In hospitalised COVID-19 patients with hypoxia and systemic inflammation, tocilizumab improved survival and other clinical outcomes. These benefits were seen regardless of the amount of respiratory support and were additional to the benefits of systemic corticosteroids. Funding UK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council) and National Institute of Health Research.
The physiologic definition of BPD reduced the overall rate of BPD and reduced the variation among centers. Significant center differences in the impact of the physiologic definition were seen, and differences remained even with the use of this standardized definition. The magnitude of the change in BPD rate is comparable to the magnitude of treatment effects seen in some clinical trials in BPD. The physiologic definition of BPD facilitates the measurement of BPD as an outcome in clinical trials and the comparison between and within centers over time.
Summary BACKGROUND Plexiform neurofibromas (PN) are slow growing chemoradiotherapy resistant tumours arising in patients with neurofibromatosis type I (NF1). Currently there are no viable therapeutic options for patients whose life-threatening plexiform neurofibromas cannot be surgically removed due to proximity to vital body structures. Based on identification of molecular targets in genetic mouse models of human NF1 tumours, we hypothesized that the oral kinase inhibitor, imatinib mesylate, may be effective in targeted treatment of these chemoradiotherapy-refractory tumours. METHODS An open-label pilot Phase II clinical trial was designed to test whether treatment with imatinib mesylate can decrease volume burden of clinically significant plexiform neurofibromas in NF1 patients. The entry criteria require patients only to have NF1 and a clinically significant plexiform neurofibroma with the specified age limitations (age 3–65). Patients were treated with daily oral imatinib at 440 mg/m2/day for children and 800 mg/day for adults divided twice daily for 6 months. The primary endpoint measure of significant response was a 20% or more reduction in plexiform size by sequential volumetric MRI imaging. Clinical data was analyzed on an intent to treat basis, however to determine the activity of imatinib on NF1-related plexiform tumours, patients able to take imatinib for 6 months were evaluated for their response. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of safety of imatinib mesylate in this group of patients. The trial is registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov/; study number 0512-25. The trial currently is closed to enrollment, however there is a single patient that continues to respond and remains on study. FINDINGS On an intent to treat basis, 6 out of 36 patients or 17% (95% CI: 6 – 33%) experienced objective response to imatinib mesylate. In the evaluable study population of patients (n=23) who received drug for at least six months, six patients (26%; 95% CI: 10 – 48%) experienced ≥ 20% decrease in volume of one or more plexiform tumours and 30% of study patients had symptomatic improvement. We noted significant inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity of plexiform neurofibroma response. Toxicity of drug was comparable to previous reports in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia. The most common adverse events were reversible skin rash (5 patients) and edema with weight gain (6 patients). More serious adverse events included reversible grade 3 neutropenia (2 patients) and grade 4 transaminitis (one patient). INTERPRETATION Imatinib mesylate caused disease regression in 26% of evaluable patients with clinically significant plexiform neurofibromas due to neurofibromatosis type 1. These results warrant confirmation in a larger multi-institutional clinical trial aimed at this patient population. These findings provide the first demonstration of radiographic volumetric tumour reduction in response to medical therapy in patients with NF1 plexiform neurofibromas using imatinib mesylate based on studies...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.