Microbiota are microorganismal communities colonizing human tissues exposed to the external environment, including the urogenital tract. The bacterial composition of the vaginal microbiota has been established and is partially related to obstetric outcome, while the uterine microbiota, considered to be a sterile environment for years, is now the focus of more extensive studies and debates. The characterization of the microbiota contained in the reproductive tract (RT) of asymptomatic and infertile women, could define a specific RT microbiota associated with implantation failure. In this pilot study, 34 women undergoing personalized hormonal stimulation were recruited and the biological samples of each patient, vaginal fluid, and endometrial biopsy, were collected immediately prior to oocyte-pick up, and sequenced. Women were subsequently divided into groups according to fertilization outcome. Analysis of the 16s rRNA V4-V5 region revealed a significant difference between vaginal and endometrial microbiota. The vaginal microbiota of pregnant women corroborated previous data, exhibiting a lactobacilli-dominant habitat compared to non-pregnant cases, while the endometrial bacterial colonization was characterized by a polymicrobial ecosystem in which lactobacilli were exclusively detected in the group that displayed unsuccessful in vitro fertilization. Overall, these preliminary results revisit our knowledge of the genitourinary microbiota, and highlight a putative relationship between vaginal/endometrial microbiota and reproductive success.

HyFoSy allows a more accurate diagnosis of tubal patency compared with HyCoSy. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 45:67-71, 2017.

In our study, both slings showed a high rate of continence without any major complications. The sexual function also improved sharply in all the six FSFI domains, with no statistically significant difference between the two treatment groups.

Our findings indicated that p16INK4a or p16INK4a/p53 immunoreactivity, along with histological diagnosis, could be a convenient means to adequately classify VIN and its connection to HPV infection. Therefore, the clear recognition of HPV-associated VIN would lead to an appropriate strategy of treatment and follow-up.

This systematic review of 43 studies aims to evaluate the absolute and relative sensitivity and specificity of p16INK4a with regard to uterine cervix lesions, describing innovations and techniques for the detection of high-grade cervical dysplasia and allowing correct treatment. Studies were identified in the PubMed database up to March 2015. The keywords hrHPV, p16INK4a gene, and uterine cervical disease (MeSH terms) were used. Only English-language articles were included. We considered retrospective and prospective studies that assessed p16INK4a or p16INK4a/Ki67 staining, with or without HPV-DNA testing (HC2/PCR) as a comparator test, in cytological/histological specimens for which the diagnosis of ASCUS, LSIL or HSIL was verified with a reference standard. The primary outcome for cervical lesions was evaluation of the absolute p16INK4a immunoreactivity; the secondary outcome was evaluation of the relative p16INK4a immunoreactivity versus HPV testing in those studies where comparator tests were available. p16INK4a was more specific than HPV-DNA test (median values of 56.1% vs. 52.25% in CIN grade ≥2 lesions; 82.5% vs. 53% in negative and CIN grade ≥1 lesions). The main limitation of this study is linked to both qualitative and quantitative p16INK4a levels of expression, while the second limitation is the lack of standardized scales. p16INK4a and HPV-DNA used together increased the sensitivity and negative predictive value for CIN detection. p16INK4a can be considered a biomarker of CIN2 or CIN3, indicating a high risk of relapse or evolution to invasive carcinoma. Also p16INK4a-negative CIN should be considered and further research should be performed.