The potential impact of biofilm on healing in acute and chronic wounds is one of the most controversial current issues in wound care. A significant amount of laboratory-based research has been carried out on this topic, however, in 2013 the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) pointed out the lack of guidance for managing biofilms in clinical practice and solicited the need for guidelines and further clinical research. In response to this challenge, the Italian Nursing Wound Healing Society (AISLeC) initiated a project which aimed to achieve consensus among a multidisciplinary and multiprofessional international panel of experts to identify what could be considered part of 'good clinical practice' with respect to the recognition and management of biofilms in acute and chronic wounds. The group followed a systematic approach, developed by the GRADE working group, to define relevant questions and clinical recommendations raised in clinical practice. An independent librarian retrieved and screened approximately 2000 pertinent published papers to produce tables of levels of evidence. After a smaller focus group had a multistep structured discussion, and a formal voting process had been completed, ten therapeutic interventions were identified as being strongly recommendable for clinical practice, while another four recommendations were graded as being 'weak'. The panel subsequently formulated a preliminary statement (although with a weak grade of agreement): 'provided that other causes that prevent optimal wound healing have been ruled out, chronic wounds are chronically infected'. All members of the panel agreed that there is a paucity of reliable, well-conducted clinical trials which have produced clear evidence related to the effects of biofilm presence. In the meantime it was agreed that expert-based guidelines were needed to be developed for the recognition and management of biofilms in wounds and for the best design of future clinical trials. This is a fundamental and urgent task for both laboratory-based scientists and clinicians.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a new promising class of antitumor drugs that have been associated with a number of immune-related Adverse Events (AEs), including musculoskeletal and rheumatic disease.Methods: We searched Medline reviewing reports of musculoskeletal and rheumatic AEs induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors.Results: Several musculoskeletal and rheumatic AEs associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment are reported in the literature. In particular, arthralgia and myalgia were the most common reported AEs, whereas the prevalence of arthritis, myositis and vasculitis is less characterized and mainly reported in case series and case reports. Other occasionally described AEs are sicca syndrome, polymyalgia rheumatica, systemic lupus erythematosus and sarcoidosis.Conclusion: Newly induced musculoskeletal and rheumatic diseases are a frequent adverse event associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment

BackgroundCastleman-Kojima disease (TAFRO Syndrome) is characterized by Thrombocytopenia, Anasarca, myeloFibrosis, Renal dysfunction, Organomegaly, multiple lymphadenopathy and histopathology pattern of atypical Castleman’s disease (CD). Only few cases of this recently identified unique variant of Multicentric CD (MCD) are described in literature, all Japanese. It therefore poses serious diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.Case descriptionWe describe a 21 year old woman with fever, asthenia, bilateral pleural effusion, ascites, hypoalbuminemia, severe thrombocytopenia, anemia, renal failure and proteinuria, whereas microbiological tests, immune serology (except ANA) and bone marrow biopsy were all negative. A CT-scan showed multiple lymphadenopathy and tissue samplings of mediastinal lymph nodes was compatible with a mixed-type CD. The diagnosis of MCD with TAFRO syndrome was made, but after an initial improvement with high dose corticosteroid therapy, clinical and laboratory features worsened. Based upon the high serum IL-6 levels and the high number of CD20-lymphocytes in lymph nodes tissue, we started tocilizumab (partial benefit), followed by rituximab combined with CVP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone) chemotherapy, achieving a complete response. A total of six cycles of R-CVP were administered monthly, followed by maintenance with monthly rituximab. A complete remission persists at the 12th month of follow-up.ConclusionsIn patients with massive immune system activation and lymphadenopathy it is mandatory to rule out Castleman-Kojima disease. In our patient a therapy aimed at the prominent pathophysiological abnormalities has been successful so far. However, since the rarity of TAFRO Syndrome, a multicenter registry is strongly desirable for a better understanding of the disease mechanisms, hopefully leading to evidence-based therapeutic choices.

No abstract