Background
Re-coarctation after the Norwood procedure increases risk for mortality. The Single Ventricle Reconstruction (SVR) trial randomized subjects with a single right ventricle undergoing a Norwood procedure to a modified Blalock-Taussig shunt (MBTS) or right ventricle-pulmonary artery shunt (RVPAS). We sought to determine incidence of re-coarctation, risk factors and outcomes in the SVR trial.
Methods and Results
Re-coarctation was defined by intervention, either catheter-based or surgical. Univariate analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were performed adjusting for center. Of the 549 SVR subjects, 97 (18%) underwent 131 interventions (92 balloon aortoplasty; 39 surgical) for re-coarctation at median age 4.9 months (range: 1.1–10.5). Intervention typically occurred at pre-stage II catheterization (n=71, 54%) or at stage II surgery (n=38, 29%). In multivariable analysis, re-coarctation was associated with the shunt type in place at the end of the Norwood procedure (HR 2.0 for RVPAS vs. MBTS, p=0.02), and Norwood discharge peak echo-Doppler arch gradient (HR 1.07 per 1 mmHg, p<0.01). Subjects with re-coarctation demonstrated comorbidities at pre-stage II evaluation including higher pulmonary arterial pressures (15.4±3.0 vs. 14.5±3.5 mm Hg; p=0.05), higher pulmonary vascular resistance (2.6±1.6 vs. 2.0±1.0 WU × m2; p=0.04) and increased echocardiographic volumes (end-diastolic volume: 126±39 vs. 112±33 ml/BSA1.3; p=0.02). There was no difference in 12-month post-randomization transplant-free survival between those with and without re-coarctation (p=0.14).
Conclusions
Re-coarctation is common after Norwood and contributes to pre-stage II comorbidities. Although with intervention there is no associated increase in 1-year transplant/mortality, further evaluation is warranted to evaluate effects of associated morbidities.
Contemporary community practice, procedural outcomes, and safety for 6 common congenital interventional procedures are reported. These benchmarks may be compared with individual center results and historical single-center and multicenter results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.