Background Treatment regimens and prognoses of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are quite different for tumors in different risk categories. Accurate preoperative grading of tumors is important for avoiding under‐ or overtreatment. Purpose To develop and validate an MRI texture‐based model to predict the mitotic index and its risk classification. Study Type Retrospective. Population Ninety‐one patients with histologically‐confirmed GIST; 64 patients in a training cohort, and 27 patients in a test cohort. Field Strength/Sequence T2‐weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast‐enhanced three‐dimensional volumetric interpolated breath‐hold examination (3D‐VIBE) at 1.5T. Assessment GIST images were manually segmented by two independent radiologists using ITK‐SNAP software and MRI features were extracted using Pyradiomics. Two pathologists reviewed the tissue specimens of the tumors to identify the mitotic index and risk classification in consensus. Statistical Tests The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression method was used to select texture features. A logistic regression model was established based on the radiomic score (radscore), tumor location, and maximum diameter to predict tumor classification and develop a nomogram. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the ability of the nomogram to distinguish between two tumors with different risk classifications, and a calibration curve was used to evaluate the consistency between the predicted risk and the actual risk. Results The texture signature achieved high efficacy in predicting the mitotic index area under the curve ([AUC], 0.906; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.813, 0.961). A nomogram for prediction of the risk classification of GIST, which incorporated this texture signature together with maximum tumor diameter and location, allowed good discrimination in the training cohort (AUC, 0.878; 95% CI: 0.769, 0.960) and the validation cohort (AUC, 0.903; 95% CI: 0.732, 0.922). Data Conclusion The texture‐based model can be used to predict GIST mitotic index and risk classification preoperatively. Level of Evidence 2. Technical Efficacy Stage 3

BackgroundHistological grade is one of the most important prognostic factors of endometrial carcinoma (EC) and when selecting preoperative treatment methods, conducting accurate preoperative grading is of great significance.PurposeTo develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics-based nomogram for discriminating histological grades 1 and 2 (G1 and G2) from grade 3 (G3) EC.MethodsThis was a retrospective study included 358 patients with histologically graded EC, stratified as 250 patients in a training cohort and 108 patients in a test cohort. T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and a dynamic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (3D-VIBE) were performed via 1.5-Tesla MRI. To establish ModelADC, the region of interest was manually outlined on the EC in an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. To establish the radiomic model (ModelR), EC was manually segmented by two independent radiologists and radiomic features were extracted. The Radscore was calculated based on the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. We combined the Radscore with carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and body mass index (BMI) to construct a mixed model (ModelM) and develop the predictive nomogram. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves were assessed to verify the prediction ability and the degree of consistency, respectively.ResultsAll three models showed some amount of predictive ability. Using ADC alone to predict the histological risk of EC was limited in both the cohort [area under the curve (AUC), 0.715; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.6509–0.7792] and test cohorts (AUC, 0.621; 95% CI, 0.515–0.726). In comparison with ModelADC, the discrimination ability of ModelR showed improvement (Delong test, P < 0.0001 for both the training and test cohorts). ModelM, established based on the combination of radiomic and clinical indicators, showed the best level of predictive ability in both the training (AUC, 0.925; 95% CI, 0.898–0.951) and test cohorts (AUC, 0.915; 95% CI, 0.863–0.968). Calibration curves suggested a good fit for probability (Hosmer–Lemeshow test, P = 0.673 and P = 0.804 for the training and test cohorts, respectively).ConclusionThe described radiomics-based nomogram can be used to predict EC histological classification preoperatively.

No abstract

BackgroundRelapse is the major cause of mortality in patients with resected endometrial cancer (EC). There is an urgent need for a feasible method to identify patients with high risk of relapse.PurposeTo develop a multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics-based nomogram model to predict 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) in EC.MethodsFor this retrospective study, 202 patients with EC followed up for at least 5 years after hysterectomy. A radiomics signature was extracted from T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and a dynamic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (3D-VIBE). The radiomics score (RS) was calculated based on the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. We have developed a radiomics based nomogram model (ModelN) incorporating the RS and clinical and conventional MR (cMR) risk factors. The performance was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultsThe ModelN demonstrated a good calibration and satisfactory discrimination, with a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.840 and 0.958 in the training and test cohorts, respectively. In comparison with clinical prediction model (ModelC), the discrimination ability of ModelN showed an improvement with P < 0.001 for the training cohort and P=0.032 for the test cohort. Compared to the radiomics prediction model (ModelR), ModelN discrimination ability showed an improvement for the training cohort with P = 0.021, with no statistically significant difference in the test cohort (P = 0.106). Calibration curves suggested a good fit for probability (Hosmer–Lemeshow test, P = 0.610 and P = 0.956 for the training and test cohorts, respectively).ConclusionThis multi-parameter nomogram model incorporating clinical and cMR findings is a valid method to predict 5-year PFS in patients with EC.

IntroductionPreoperative evaluation of the mitotic index (MI) of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) represents the basis of individualized treatment of patients. However, the accuracy of conventional preoperative imaging methods is limited. The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model based on multiparametric MRI for preoperative MI prediction.MethodsA total of 112 patients who were pathologically diagnosed with GIST were enrolled in this study. The dataset was subdivided into the development (n = 81) and test (n = 31) sets based on the time of diagnosis. With the use of T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map, a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based classifier was developed for MI prediction, which used a hybrid approach based on 2D tumor images and radiomics features from 3D tumor shape. The trained model was tested on an internal test set. Then, the hybrid model was comprehensively tested and compared with the conventional ResNet, shape radiomics classifier, and age plus diameter classifier.ResultsThe hybrid model showed good MI prediction ability at the image level; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision–recall curve (AUPRC), and accuracy in the test set were 0.947 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.927–0.968), 0.964 (95% CI: 0.930–0.978), and 90.8 (95% CI: 88.0–93.0), respectively. With the average probabilities from multiple samples per patient, good performance was also achieved at the patient level, with AUROC, AUPRC, and accuracy of 0.930 (95% CI: 0.828–1.000), 0.941 (95% CI: 0.792–1.000), and 93.6% (95% CI: 79.3–98.2) in the test set, respectively.DiscussionThe deep learning-based hybrid model demonstrated the potential to be a good tool for the operative and non-invasive prediction of MI in GIST patients.