Background Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) was reported to be associated with the severity of liver diseases. We aimed to investigate the association between RDW and severity of liver inflammation in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Patients and methods Ninety-two consecutive AIH patients who underwent liver biopsy during 2016–2017 were included. Liver histology was evaluated using the Scheuer scoring system. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors for significant inflammation. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results The RDW level was higher in AIH patients with significant inflammation (14.6%, interquartile range: 13.2–16.3%) than in patients with mild inflammation (13.2%, interquartile range: 12.6–13.8%). The RDW level was correlated positively with the grades of liver inflammation (r=0.356, P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of RDW in predicting significant inflammation was 0.739 (95% confidential interval: 0.634–0.843, P < 0.001), with 67.80% sensitivity and 75.76% specificity. The diagnostic performance of RDW for significant inflammation was better than alanine aminotransferase (P = 0.003) and immunoglobulin G (P = 0.049). RDW (odds ratio = 1.702, P = 0.001) was identified as an independent predictor for significant inflammation by logistic multivariable analysis. Conclusion The RDW level was correlated positively with the severity of liver inflammation in AIH patients. RDW can be a promising indicator for predicting significant liver inflammation in AIH.

No abstract

Background: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) performed by intensivists is increasingly used in critically ill patients. However, TEE is usually not the preferred monitoring tool, especially when transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) appears to have addressed the clinical problems. As a result, it remains largely unknown whether TEE is a clinically valuable replacement or supplement for TTE as a primary tool in evaluating haemodynamic problems in critically ill surgical patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic and therapeutic value of TEE instead or in addition to TTE in critically ill surgical patients with hemodynamic instability.Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted. A total of 68 consecutive patients were enrolled from December 2016 to February 2018. TEE was routinely performed in addition to TTE, and the imaging data from TTE and TEE were successively disclosed to two different primary physicians, who reported any resulting changes in management. The two physicians were required to reach a consensus if there was any disagreement. The results of the additional TEE examination were compared with the clinical findings and TTE information. The image quality of TTE views was classified as a good (score 2), suboptimal (score 1) or poor view (score 0). According to the scores of TTE images, the patients were divided into two groups: patients with adequate TTE views (score ≥6) and inadequate TTE views (score <6). Results:The results of additional TEE examination were classified into four categories. TEE failed to provide additional information about the initial diagnosis and therapy (class 1) in 26 patients (38.2%). Of the remaining 42 patients (61.8%), TEE instead or in addition to TTE revealed new findings or led to significant changes in therapy, as TTE supplied inadequate information. TEE used in addition to TTE led to a new diagnosis without therapeutic implications (class 2) in 11 patients (16.2%) and made a major clinical contribution leading to a therapeutic change (class 3) in 23 patients (33.8%). TEE used instead of TTE determined the diagnosis and therapy in 8 patients (11.8%) whose haemodynamic problems could not be addressed by TTE (class 4). In total, TEE had critical therapeutic benefits (class 3 and 4) that was not provided by TTE in 31 patients (45.6%). Of particular concern was that TEE had a higher proportion of therapeutic benefits to patients with inadequate TTE views than those with adequate TTE views (54.3% vs. 27.3%, P=0.036).Conclusions: TEE as a feasible clinical tool is useful for critically ill surgical patients with hemodynamic