ABSTRACT1. Transitional waters, described as critical transition zones because of their position at terrestrial, freshwater and marine interfaces, provide essential goods and services to the biosphere including human populations. These ecotones face increasing human influence mainly due to population density increase in coastal areas.2. Transitional water bodies have, to date, received little attention in the development of ecological status indicators; this is a critical deficiency when trying to meet the Water Framework Directive objective of all significant water bodies achieving good ecological status by the year 2015.3. In order to assess changes in transitional water communities many taxonomic-based indicators have already been proposed but there are a number of concerns for their use such as taxonomic classification difficulties, their unsuitability for multi-site comparisons and their inconsistent relationships with disturbance or stress.4. Alternative methods based on body size, abundance distribution among functional groups, functional diversity and productivity descriptors are proposed. These methods offer the opportunity to compare sites with different taxonomic compositions and allow derivation of indicators related to ecological status of communities under scrutiny.5. Finally, the suitability of these taxonomic-free descriptors to provide relevant information for each of the four main biotic compartments in coastal lagoons is discussed. The use of biomass distribution among functional groups for fish, benthos and macrophyte and to use body-size distribution for benthos and plankton is proposed.

ABSTRACT1. Transitional waters are ecotones between terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems, being characterized by high spatial heterogeneity and temporal variability.2. The EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) posed to the scientific community the challenge to classify these ecosystems into a small number of types, while retaining a functional classification of ecosystem types.3. A niche theory approach is proposed to identify the limiting forcing factors organizing biological quality elements, i.e. the limiting niche dimensions.4. The analysis of a macro-invertebrate dataset from published papers on 36 Italian lagoons suggested a two-level typological classification of Mediterranean lagoons.5. Basic ecological theories, such as niche and island biogeography theories, have fundamental implications for the process of developing a typological classification for all aquatic ecosystems, as required by the WFD.

No abstract

2. The aim was to differentiate metric variation caused by human or natural processes and thereby to (1) select reliable metrics and (2) develop user-friendly protocols for cost-effective monitoring programmes for coastal lagoon water quality.3. Eight different sites dominated by macrophyte communities characterized by two angiosperms (Ruppia cirrhosa and R. maritima), two opportunistic macroalgae (Ulva sp. and Chaetomorpha linum), and Cyanobacteria colonies were quantitatively and destructively sampled twice.4. Structural metrics showed highest heterogeneity at a local site-specific scale, while functional metrics showed highest heterogeneity at the scale of habitat. As a result the structural metrics appeared inappropriate as indicators of lagoon water quality changes. By contrast shifts of habitat dominated by angiosperms to opportunistic macroalgae owing to nutrient excess, especially nitrogen, can be identified by functional metrics, especially with EEI.

ABSTRACT1. Leaf litter decomposition rates in aquatic ecosystems are known to be related to many abiotic and biotic factors.2. Field experiments were carried out during spring 2005 in 16 ecosystems, each with four sampling sites, using the litter bag technique to investigate the influence of abiotic factors on patterns of reed litter breakdown in different physiographic, hydrological and physico-chemical gradients occurring in transitional water ecosystems in the Eastern Mediterranean and Black Sea.3. Significant differences in leaf litter decomposition were observed among the studied ecosystems along univariate gradients of tidal range, water temperature, salinity and sinuosity index.4. Overall, 71% of variance in the litter breakdown rate was explained by the hydrological, physico-chemical and physiographic components. Specifically, tidal range, salinity and sinuosity index are among the key factors in the most commonly used typological schemes for classifying transitional water ecosystems (i.e. Confinement Concept and Venice System), due to their influence on abundance and distribution of benthic macroinvertebrates and other guilds.5. The patterns observed at the regional scale of the study suggest that certain key abiotic factors are likely to play a major role as drivers of plant detritus decomposition processes, through their influence on the overall metabolism of microorganisms and benthic macroinvertebrates.