T o date, hundreds of thousands of deaths have been attributed to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) 1. Millions of infections by SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, have been reported, although its full extent has yet to be determined owing to limited testing 2. Government interventions to slow viral spread have disrupted daily life and economic activity for billions of people. Strategies to ease restraints on human mobility and interaction without provoking a major resurgence of transmission and mortality will depend on accurate estimates of population levels of infection and immunity 3. Current testing for the virus largely depends on labor-intensive molecular techniques 4. Individuals with positive molecular tests represent only a small fraction of all infections, given limited deployment and the brief time window when real-time (RT)-PCR testing has the highest sensitivity 5-7. The proportion of undocumented cases in the original epidemic focus was estimated to be as high as 86% 8 , and asymptomatic infections are suspected to play a substantial role in transmission 9-14. Widely available, reliable antibody detection assays would enable more accurate estimates of SARS-CoV-2 prevalence and incidence. On February 4, 2020, the Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services issued an emergency use authorization (EUA) for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 15 , allowing nucleic acid detection and immunoassay tests to be offered based on manufacturer-reported data without formal US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance 16. In response, dozens of companies began to market laboratory-based immunoassays and point-of-care (POC) tests. Rigorous, comparative performance data are crucial to inform clinical care and public health responses.

Long-term SARS-CoV-2-specific immune and inflammatory responses in individuals recovering from COVID-19 with and without post-acute symptoms Graphical abstract Highlights d The magnitude of early CD4 + T cell responses correlates with severity of COVID-19 d Prior lung disease correlates with higher SARS-CoV-2specific CD8 + T cell responses d PASC is associated with a decline in N-specific interferon-gproducing CD8 + T cells d Neutralizing capacity correlates with SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4 + T cell responses

As the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic continues, reports have demonstrated neurologic sequelae following COVID-19 recovery. Mechanisms to explain long-term neurological sequelae are unknown and need to be identified. Plasma from 24 individuals recovering from COVID-19 at 1 to 3 months after initial infection were collected for cytokine and antibody levels and neuronal-enriched extracellular vesicle (nEV) protein cargo analyses. Plasma cytokine IL-4 was increased in all COVID-19 participants. Volunteers with self-reported neurological problems (nCoV, n = 8) had a positive correlation of IL6 with age or severity of the sequalae, at least one co-morbidity and increased SARS-CoV-2 antibody compared to those COVID-19 individuals without neurological issues (CoV, n = 16). Protein markers of neuronal dysfunction including amyloid beta, neurofilament light, neurogranin, total tau, and p-T181-tau were all significantly increased in the nEVs of all participants recovering from COVID-19 compared to historic controls. This study suggests ongoing peripheral and neuroinflammation after COVID-19 infection that may influence neurological sequelae by altering nEV proteins. Individuals recovering from COVID-19 may have occult neural damage while those with demonstrative neurological symptoms additionally had more severe infection. Longitudinal studies to monitor plasma biomarkers and nEV cargo are warranted to assess persistent neurodegeneration and systemic effects.

Interpretation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serosurveillance studies is limited by poorly defined performance of antibody assays over time in individuals with different clinical presentations. We measured antibody responses in plasma samples from 128 individuals over 160 days using 14 assays. We found a consistent and strong effect of disease severity on antibody magnitude, driven by fever, cough, hospitalization, and oxygen requirement. Responses to spike protein versus nucleocapsid had consistently higher correlation with neutralization. Assays varied substantially in sensitivity during early convalescence and time to seroreversion. Variability was dramatic for individuals with mild infection, who had consistently lower antibody titers, with sensitivities at 6 months ranging from 33 to 98% for commercial assays. Thus, the ability to detect previous infection by SARS-CoV-2 is highly dependent on infection severity, timing, and the assay used. These findings have important implications for the design and interpretation of SARS-CoV-2 serosurveillance studies.

Current serology tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies mainly take the form of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassays or lateral flow assays, which are either laborious, expensive or lacking sufficient sensitivity and scalability. Here we present the development and validation of a rapid, low-cost, solution-based assay to detect antibodies in serum, plasma, whole blood and to a lesser extent saliva, using rationally designed split luciferase antibody biosensors. This new assay, which generates quantitative results in 30 min, substantially reduces the complexity and improves the scalability of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) antibody tests. This assay is well-suited for point-of-care, broad population testing, and applications in low-resource settings, for monitoring host humoral responses to vaccination or viral infection.As the vaccine deployment starts worldwide for COVID-19, broad antibody testing for SARS-CoV-2 faces severe limitations. Although nucleic acid testing is critical to detecting the virus, serological antibody tests are vital tools for monitoring the dynamic human humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and viral infection 1 . Population-scale, longitudinal evaluation of antibody responses is needed to determine the strength and duration of immunity to the primary virus, to the variants, and to vaccines, which is important in informing public policy and vaccination strategies 2-7 . In addition, antibody tests serve as a complement or an alternative to nucleic acid diagnostics for patients with a low viral load or for low-resource areas where expensive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing is difficult to access [8][9][10] . Serological tests also support therapeutic development through identification of either individuals who could serve as donors for convalescent serum therapeutics 11 , or patients with potentially strong neutralizing antibodies that can be produced in vitro as new antivirals and prophylactics 12,13 . All these applications would be greatly accelerated with an assay that is simple, rapid and high throughput, without sacrificing accuracy and sensitivity.Traditional serological assays are not optimal in the face of this broad pandemic. The most widely used laboratory serological tests take the form of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays