Bone tissue mechanical properties are deemed a key component of bone strength, but their assessment requires invasive procedures. Here we validate a new instrument, a reference point indentation (RPI) instrument, for measuring these tissue properties in vivo. The RPI instrument performs bone microindentation testing (BMT) by inserting a probe assembly through the skin covering the tibia and, after displacing periosteum, applying 20 indentation cycles at 2 Hz each with a maximum force of 11 N. We assessed 27 women with osteoporosis-related fractures and 8 controls of comparable ages. Measured total indentation distance (46.0 ± 14 versus 31.7 ± 3.3 µm, p = .008) and indentation distance increase (18.1 ± 5.6 versus 12.3 ± 2.9 µm, p = .008) were significantly greater in fracture patients than in controls. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the two measurements were 93.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 83.1–100) and 90.3% (95% CI 73.2–100), respectively. Interobserver coefficient of variation ranged from 8.7% to 15.5%, and the procedure was well tolerated. In a separate study of cadaveric human bone samples (n = 5), crack growth toughness and indentation distance increase correlated (r = –0.9036, p = .018), and scanning electron microscope images of cracks induced by indentation and by experimental fractures were similar. We conclude that BMT, by inducing microscopic fractures, directly measures bone mechanical properties at the tissue level. The technique is feasible for use in clinics with good reproducibility. It discriminates precisely between patients with and without fragility fracture and may provide clinicians and researchers with a direct in vivo measurement of bone tissue resistance to fracture. © 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Atypical femoral fractures (AFF) associated with long-term bisphosphonates (LTB) are a growing concern. Their etiology is unknown, but bone material properties might be deteriorated. In an AFF series, we analyzed the bone material properties by microindentation. Four groups of patients were included: 6 AFF, 38 typical osteoporotic fractures, 6 LTB, and 20 controls without fracture. Neither typical osteoporotic fractures nor controls have received any antiosteoporotic medication. A general laboratory workup, bone densitometry by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and microindentation testing at the tibia were done in all patients. Total indentation distance (Total ID), indentation distance increase (IDI), and creep indentation distance (Creep ID) were measured (microns). Age-adjusted analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used for comparisons. Controls were significantly younger than fracture groups. Bisphosphonate exposure was on average 5.5 years (range 5 to 12 years) for the AFF and 5.4 years (range 5 to 8 years) for the LTB groups. Total ID (microns) showed better material properties (lower Total ID) for controls 36 (AE 6; mean AE SD) than for AFF 46 (AE 4) and for typical femoral fractures 47 (AE 13), respectively. Patients on LTB showed values between controls and fractures, 38 (AE 4), although not significantly different from any of the other three groups. IDI values showed a similar pattern 13 (AE 2), 16 (AE 6), 19 (AE 3), and 18 (AE 5). After adjusting by age, significant differences were seen between controls and typical (p < 0.001) and atypical fractures (p ¼ 0.03) for Total ID and for IDI (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively). There were no differences in Creep ID between groups. Our data suggest that patients with AFF have a deep deterioration in bone material properties at a tissue level similar to that for the osteoporotic fracture group. The LTB group shows levels that are in between controls and both type of fractures, although not statistically different. These results suggest that bisphosphonate therapy probably does not put the majority of patients at risk for AFF. ß
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in regulatory regions of candidate genes may determine variability in bone mineral density (BMD) because they may be responsible for differences in levels of a gene product in response to external signals. Under this hypothesis, we scanned an 800-base pair (bp) region within the COL1A1 promoter, known to harbor cis elements important for in vivo expression, and we found two new polymorphisms: ؊1663indelT and ؊1997 G/T. The G to T transversion at ؊1997 was associated with lumbar spine BMD (p ؍ 0.015) when tested in a cohort of 256 postmenopausal women after adjusting by age, body weight, and years since menopause; a lower degree of association was detected also for femoral neck BMD in a subgroup of 146 women in univariate analysis and after adjusting by age (p ؍ 0.044). The polymorphism ؊1663indelT, which corresponds to a deletion of a T in a tract of eight T residues (؊1670 to ؊1663), did not show significant association with BMD. Interestingly, ؊1663indelT is in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) with the previously described Sp1 polymorphism of intron 1, which in this study did not show association with BMD either. Significant interaction between ؊1997 G/T and ؊1663indelT (p ؍ 0.019), and between ؊1997 G/T and Sp1 (p ؍ 0.045) was observed also. Individuals heterozygous for the three polymorphisms showed the highest mean BMD value. Gel retardation assays showed that oligonucleotides containing either the ؊1663 or the ؊1997 polymorphic sites specifically bind primary osteoblast nuclear proteins. We named these binding sites as PCOL1 and PCOL2, respectively. In summary, this study describes two new SNPs in the COL1A1 promoter, which may affect bone mass determination. (J Bone Miner Res 2002;17:384 -393)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.