No abstract

Canagliflozin provided sustained effects on UGE and FPG over 12 weeks and a transient reduction in plasma volume that was largely attenuated by week 12.

No abstract

Context Cotadutide is a dual receptor agonist with balanced glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucagon activity. Objective To evaluate different doses of cotadutide and investigate underlying mechanisms for its glucose-lowering effects. Design/setting Randomized, double-blind, phase 2a study conducted in 2 cohorts at 5 clinical trial sites. Patients Participants were 65 adult overweight/obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus; 63 completed the study; 2 were withdrawn due to AEs. Intervention Once-daily subcutaneous cotadutide or placebo for 49 days. Doses (50–300 µg) were uptitrated weekly (cohort 1) or biweekly (cohort 2). Main outcome measures Co-primary end points (cohort 1) were percentage changes from baseline to end of treatment in glucose (area under the curve from 0 to 4 hours [AUC0–4h]) post–mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) and weight. Exploratory measures included postprandial insulin and gastric emptying time (GET; cohort 2). Results Patients received cotadutide (cohort 1, n = 26; cohort 2, n = 20) or placebo (cohort 1, n = 13; cohort 2, n = 6). Significant reductions were observed with cotadutide vs placebo in glucose AUC0–4h post MMTT (least squares mean [90% CI], −21.52% [−25.68, −17.37] vs 6.32% [0.45, 12.20]; P < 0.001) and body weight (−3.41% [−4.37, −2.44] vs −0.08% [−1.45, 1.28]; P = 0.002). A significant increase in insulin AUC0–4h post MMTT was observed with cotadutide (19.3 mU.h/L [5.9, 32.6]; P = 0.008) and GET was prolonged on day 43 with cotadutide vs placebo (t½: 117.2 minutes vs −42.9 minutes; P = 0.0392). Conclusion These results suggest that the glucose-lowering effects of cotadutide are mediated by enhanced insulin secretion and delayed gastric emptying. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03244800.

The hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic glucose clamp has always been regarded as the "gold standard" for the assessment of pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of insulin preparations; however, there has been controversy over a variety of methodogical details, such as study population, dosing time and the initial stabilization of blood glucose (BG) concentrations at the clamp target level, among clamp groups. As the impact of these details on PD results is unclear, the present review provides an overview of different methodological approaches for both the man- However, even before this, clamp experts had discussed and sometimes disagreed on methodological details, 5 making it difficult to assess the PD results of glucose clamp studies for non-experts, particularly when these results differed between clamp groups. It might therefore be time to review both the strengths and the limitations of the clamp technique, addressing the most important methodological issues and discussing their potential impact on PD outcomes. | GLUCOSE CLAMP STUDIES: PRINCIPLE AND BASIC CONSIDERATIONSThe principle of the PD glucose clamp is quite simple 1 : the blood glucose (BG)-lowering effect of an insulin is antagonized by glucose